Biography
Carissa Yip is an American chess player who earned the title of International Master from FIDE. A formidable tactician and relentless competitor, she also shares her journey with a growing online audience as a streamer.
With a sharp Blitz style and a playful sense of humor, she has become a fan favorite for both decisive finishes and insightful post‑game analysis.
Her peak Blitz rating reached 2648, a testament to quick thinking and fearless creativity on the clock.
Career highlights
- International Master title from FIDE
- Prominent chess streamer with an engaged online community
- Peak Blitz rating of 2648
Playing style and repertoire
Carissa blends aggressive tactical play with solid fundamentals. In Blitz and Bullet, she favors dynamic openings that invite sharp, fast-paced battles.
- King's Indian Attack
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation
- Modern
Streaming and community
Beyond the board, Carissa builds a welcoming community through her streams, where she explains ideas, shares behind-the-scenes moments, and celebrates learning from every game.
See more
Profile and recent games: carissayip. For a quick glance at her activity, watch the visualization placeholder:
.Notes
Preferred time control appears to be Blitz, aligning with her online presence and streaming focus.
Feedback for Carissa Yip
Carissa, your recent games show strong opening knowledge and strategic awareness, especially in English and Pirc Defense structures. Your ability to quickly develop pieces and control the center has been a consistent strength, providing good middlegame positions to work with.
In your winning games, you demonstrated effective use of your minor pieces and good calculation to capitalize on opponent inaccuracies—your transitions from the opening to the middlegame were smooth and purposeful. For example, in the last victory, your knight maneuvers and timely exchanges created pressure and led to your opponent’s resignation. Keep reinforcing this tactical awareness and positional understanding.
However, looking at your losses, there are a few areas to focus on to take your game to the next level:
- Endgame technique: Some of the losses occurred after the middlegame where precise endgame conversion was challenging. Investing time in studying endgame fundamentals can increase your ability to secure half-points or convert advantages.
- Time management: Your clock usage is usually solid, but in a few games, spending too much time in critical moments might lead to rushed moves later on. Consider practicing to balance deep calculation with quicker decision-making.
- Vulnerability to counterattack: Occasionally, you faced challenges when the opponent broke through your position, especially on the kingside. Reviewing defensive techniques and counter-measures in dynamic positions might help you better parry such threats.
Going forward, continue to expand your repertoire and test various pawn structures to deepen your understanding. Also, regular analysis of your own games with a focus on accuracy and alternative candidate moves will sharpen your strategic vision.
Your peak rating (classical/rapid/blitz) is commendable and reflects your hard work and talent. Stay consistent with your training, and you will see continued progress.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Jacobson | 66W / 90L / 10D | View Games |
| Justin Liang | 61W / 67L / 8D | View Games |
| Devina Devagharan | 35W / 87L / 0D | View Games |
| dzhang24143 | 101W / 18L / 0D | View Games |
| elijah528 | 82W / 1L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2524 | 2612 | ||
| 2024 | 2471 | 2285 | ||
| 2023 | 2460 | 2460 | 2285 | |
| 2022 | 2405 | 2460 | 2333 | |
| 2021 | 2400 | 2447 | 2333 | |
| 2020 | 2386 | 2398 | 2328 | |
| 2019 | 2318 | |||
| 2018 | 1800 | |||
| 2017 | 1888 | 1819 | 2170 | |
| 2016 | 1815 | |||
| 2015 | 1585 | 1913 | 2219 | 1592 |
| 2014 | 1247 | 1693 | 1935 | 1546 |
| 2013 | 1680 | 1911 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9W / 6L / 4D | 3W / 9L / 1D | 81.0 |
| 2024 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 59.5 |
| 2023 | 24W / 4L / 1D | 31W / 3L / 2D | 64.2 |
| 2022 | 30W / 20L / 2D | 26W / 21L / 4D | 71.6 |
| 2021 | 43W / 47L / 2D | 48W / 47L / 3D | 73.3 |
| 2020 | 332W / 300L / 42D | 291W / 334L / 39D | 66.0 |
| 2019 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 2L / 0D | 83.0 |
| 2018 | 2W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 3L / 0D | 62.4 |
| 2017 | 14W / 13L / 2D | 12W / 14L / 2D | 59.3 |
| 2016 | 8W / 6L / 0D | 8W / 6L / 0D | 59.1 |
| 2015 | 44W / 28L / 6D | 41W / 31L / 1D | 62.5 |
| 2014 | 21W / 21L / 1D | 17W / 24L / 3D | 59.4 |
| 2013 | 19W / 11L / 0D | 21W / 6L / 2D | 66.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 126 | 62 | 63 | 1 | 49.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 114 | 46 | 66 | 2 | 40.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 89 | 46 | 43 | 0 | 51.7% |
| Modern | 80 | 38 | 41 | 1 | 47.5% |
| King's Indian Attack | 72 | 47 | 25 | 0 | 65.3% |
| Australian Defense | 45 | 15 | 26 | 4 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 33 | 14 | 17 | 2 | 42.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 24 | 8 | 13 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Czech Defense | 23 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 60.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 22 | 8 | 13 | 1 | 36.4% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 57 | 29 | 26 | 2 | 50.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 57 | 30 | 21 | 6 | 52.6% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 35 | 11 | 20 | 4 | 31.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 29 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 55.2% |
| Australian Defense | 26 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 25 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 48.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 24 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 24 | 8 | 14 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 24 | 7 | 14 | 3 | 29.2% |
| Vienna Gambit: 3...d5 4.exd5 | 21 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 33.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| Modern | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Australian Defense | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 0 |
| Losing | 18 | 3 |