Endgame tablebase
Endgame Tablebase
Definition
An endgame tablebase is a fully calculated database that contains the objectively best line (perfect play) for every legal position with a given, limited number of pieces on the board. For each position the tablebase stores:
- The theoretical result (win, loss, or draw) against optimal defence.
- The distance-to-mate (DTM) or other distance metrics such as distance-to-zeroing the 50-move counter (DTZ).
- The unique optimal move(s) that achieve that result.
Because every position is solved exhaustively, endgame tablebases represent perfect chess knowledge within their material limit.
Creation & Technology
The construction of a tablebase uses retrograde analysis – starting from all possible checkmated positions and working backwards. Each earlier position is labelled as “win” if it can force a mate, “loss” if every move leads to a win for the opponent, or “draw” otherwise.
Notable milestones:
- 1965–1970s, USSR: Russian mathematicians such as Mikhail Botvinnik explored hand-calculated pawnless endings.
- 1977–1991, Bell Labs: Ken Thompson built the first 5-piece tablebases, shocking grandmasters with positions like KQKR that required up to 61 moves.
- 1998–2005: Eugene Nalimov produced highly compressed 3–6-piece tablebases (the “Nalimov TBs”) that became the engine standard.
- 2012, Moscow State University: The Lomonosov 7-piece tablebases were completed, comprising 140+ TB of data and definitively solving all endings with seven pieces or fewer.
- 2023-present: Ongoing research is experimenting with 8-piece “syzygy-style” tables and probabilistic storage to reduce space.
Practical Usage
- Engine Play: Modern chess engines consult 5–7-piece tablebases during search to replace computation with perfect knowledge, dramatically boosting strength in simplified positions.
- Human Training: Players use GUI integrations (e.g., Chessbase, Lichess, Chess.com) to drill specific endings and verify whether a line is winning or drawing.
- Composition & Proof Games: Problemists rely on tablebases to certify that studies are sound and to craft spectacular save-or-win ideas.
- Adjudication: Online correspondence servers automatically declare the result once a tablebase position is reached, eliminating interminable play.
Strategic Significance
Tablebases have redefined practical endgame theory:
- Lines long thought drawn (e.g., rook and bishop versus rook) were proven winning with best play, albeit often beyond the 50-move rule.
- Optimal defence guidelines—such as the “second-rank defence” in KQKR—have been revised and improved thanks to tablebase traces.
- Engine evaluations are calibrated against tablebase truth, ensuring that a 0.00 score in a 7-piece position really means a forced draw.
Famous Discoveries
- Long Mates: The position KRNKNN (king, rook, knight vs. king and two knights) can require up to 223 moves to convert—far beyond the 50-move limit.
- Troitzky Line Vindicated: Tablebases confirmed the Russian master Troitzky’s 1902 analysis that KNNKP is winning if the defending king is trapped behind the “Troitzky line.”
- R+B vs. R: Maximum mate length is 59 moves; engines demonstrated practical winning plans like the “third-rank squeeze.”
Example Position
Consider the classic KQKR ending:
FEN: 8/8/8/2k5/1K6/8/8/6Q1 w - - 0 1
Tablebase verdict: Mate in 30. The quickest line begins 1. Qg5+ Kd4 2. Qd2+ Ke4 ... and so on. Even world champions once mis-evaluated such positions!
Explore interactively:
Interesting Facts & Anecdotes
- During the 1980s Ken Thompson challenged grandmasters to “bet” on KBBKN positions. Even elite players often chose the wrong side—and lost lunch money!
- Deep Blue incorporated Thompson’s 5-piece tables in its 1997 match vs. Kasparov, ensuring perfect play once major material came off.
- FIDE’s 50-move rule creates practical paradoxes: a tablebase might show a forced win in 80 moves, yet it is officially drawn unless a pawn push or capture resets the counter.
- The complete 7-piece Lomonosov tables contain roughly 553 trillion unique positions and would require centuries to enumerate by brute force without clever pruning.