Scandinavian Defense Boehnke Gambit
Scandinavian Defense – Boehnke Gambit
Definition
The Boehnke Gambit is an aggressive branch of the Scandinavian Defense that arises after the moves 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 c6!? . Black immediately sacrifices the c-pawn (and often a second pawn) in order to seize the initiative, accelerate development, and open lines toward the white king. The gambit is named after the German theoretician Dr. Kurt (or Karl) Böhne/Böhneke, who analysed it in the early 20th century.
Basic Move Order
The most common path is:
- e4 d5
- exd5 c6 (Black offers the c-pawn)
- dxc6 Nxc6 (Black recaptures with a knight, already pressuring the centre)
- Nf3 e5 (typical follow-up; …e5 or …Bf5 & …e6 are alternative schemes)
Other sidelines include 3.d4 (declining the gambit) or 3.Nc3 Nf6 when Black maintains a fluid, open structure. A quick illustration is shown below:
Strategic Ideas & Plans
- Rapid Development – By giving up a pawn, Black brings both knights to active posts (Nc6, Nf6) and often follows with …Bf5, …e6, and castling long, generating immediate piece play.
- Central & Kingside Pressure – The lever …e5 (or occasionally …e6) hits the white centre. If White castles kingside, Black may launch a pawn-storm with …h5–h4 or sacrifice on g3.
- Open Files – After the typical exchange on d5 and later …exd4, the e- and d-files open, giving the black rooks powerful avenues.
- Endgame Outlook – If the middlegame complications fade, the extra pawn often tells for White; therefore Black aims to keep pieces on and maintain tension.
Theory Status (2020s)
Engine evaluations hover between +0.5 and +1.0 for White in the main lines, so the gambit is objectively dubious but playable. Its surprise value, however, makes it a dangerous weapon in rapid, blitz, and over-the-board club play.
Historical Notes
- The initial printed analysis is attributed to Dr. Kurt Böhneke in the German periodical Deutsche Schachzeitung (1930s).
- In older English sources you may also see the spellings
Böehnke
,Boehnke
, or simply theScandinavian Gambit
. - Grandmasters such as Bent Larsen and Ulf Andersson experimented with it in the 1970s correspondence scene, though rarely over-the-board.
Illustrative Games
-
Michael Basman – David LeMoir, British League 1981
Result: 0-1
Basman, a creative attacker himself, was lured into accepting the pawn. LeMoir’s swift …Qb6 …e5 …Bc5 left White’s king stranded in the centre. -
Gawain Jones – Simon Williams, London Classic Blitz 2016
Result: ½-½
A modern, high-speed skirmish in which Black’s pawn sac netted a time advantage but Jones steered the game into a perpetual check.
Typical Continuation (after 3.dxc6)
A model attacking blueprint for Black:
1. e4 d5 2. exd5 c6 3. dxc6 Nxc6 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Nf3 Bg4 6. Be2 e6 7. d3 Qc7 8. h3 Bf5 9. O-O O-O-O
With kings castled on opposite wings, both sides race pawns forward — White on the queenside, Black on the kingside and through the centre.
Pros & Cons
- + Surprise Value – Rarely seen at master level; most theory-heavy opponents are thrown out of book on move 2.
- + Initiative – Black’s pieces hit the board quickly; White must tread carefully to neutralise the pressure.
- − Objective Soundness – Engines give White a small but stable edge with best play.
- − Endgame Risks – If the attack fizzles, Black is simply a pawn down.
Practical Tips
- After 3.dxc6 Nxc6, avoid slow moves like Be2; either strike back in the centre with d4 or return the pawn with c3 to complete development.
- Black players should learn typical mating patterns against a castled white king: sacrifices on h3 and g2, queen lifts to h4, and rook swings via h6.
- In blitz, the line 4.Nf3 e5 5.Bb5 e4!? poses difficult practical problems for White despite analytical objections.
Interesting Facts & Anecdotes
- Many databases incorrectly label the Boehnke Gambit as the
Icelandic-Palme Gambit
; the latter actually arises from 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Nf6 3.d4 e6. - In the early Internet Chess Club days, the handle
DrBoehnke
popularised the gambit in bullet chess, winning hundreds of games with flashy queen sacrifices. - Bent Larsen once remarked,
The pawn on c6 is a small price to pay for the right to annoy theoreticians.
Conclusion
The Boehnke Gambit is not objectively sound, yet it embodies the romantic spirit of open-game pawn sacs: fast development, open lines, and the promise of a whirlwind attack. For players who enjoy sharp play and are willing to study the critical continuations, it can be a valuable surprise weapon in rapid and club play.