Justin B Burgess - National Master Extraordinaire
Also known in the digital realm as 2012VAChamp, Justin B Burgess is no ordinary chess player. Earning the prestigious title of National Master, Justin has proven time and again that strategy, patience, and cunning are their closest allies on the 64 squares.
The Journey
Since 2012, Justin has been waging war in the realms of bullet, blitz, rapid, and daily chess—showing impressive versatility. Starting with a bullet rating of 2250 and a blitz rating over 2000, Justin quickly carved out a name as a fierce competitor. In recent years, their rapid rating has soared past 2179, and blitz hovers impressively above 2400. Who said bullet chess isn't for serious players?
Style and Strength
Justin's style can be summarized as a rollercoaster of endurance and nerve. Their average moves per win is about 68, revealing a love for deep, strategic warfare rather than quick tactical skirmishes. This master values the endgame, with a whopping 74% frequency of endgame appearances—clearly they enjoy savoring the final moments of the battle.
When life hits and pieces are lost, fear not! With a come-back rate of 84% and a staggering win rate after losing a piece at nearly 100%, Justin is the phoenix of the chessboard, rising from every setback with renewed vigor.
Records and Streaks
When it comes to winning, Justin takes the cake (and probably eats it too). They boast an awe-inspiring longest winning streak of 108 games, a feat that would make even the fiercest grandmasters sit up and take notice. Currently, the streak rests at zero, but given Justin’s relentless fighting spirit, it’s only a matter of time before the domination resumes.
Opening Secrets
While their exact weaponry is, amusingly, a top secret, their performance with these classified openings is impressive. Winning around 60-90% of games across formats using these mystery openings, opponents probably dread the unknown lines Justin deploys. The element of surprise is clearly an ace up Justin’s sleeve.
Opponent Allies and Rivalries
Justin has faced a vast array of challengers, often walking away victorious. Some opponents yield a perfect 100% defeat rate, while a lucky few still manage to dodge the inevitable (well, 0% wins). Of note, Justin’s win rate against “crazyq2001” stands at a casual 50%, showing even the best have some fun challengers.
Off the Board
An early resignation rate of just under 1% suggests Justin prefers to fight till the last pawn drops, or at least until the coffee kicks in. Their psychological tilt factor is a manageable 8 out of 100, proving they're more zen than panic-stricken when pawns start vanishing mysteriously.
In Summary
Justin B Burgess is a chess force with a blend of wit, resilience, and talent. From bullet blitz battles to the slow, contemplative daily games, this National Master crafts victories with flair and a dash of mystery. Opponents beware—Justin’s chessboard might just be the trickiest puzzle you’ll face this tournament.
Coaching Feedback for Justin B Burgess
1. Big-picture assessment
Your overall results show an experienced attacking player with a solid theoretical base in the Sicilian and Scotch, and a peak strength around 2534 (2023-06-04). You routinely out-calculate opposition rated 200–400 elo lower, but run into trouble against peers because of recurring strategic and time-management issues. The balance of your games suggests that polishing a few specific areas could convert many of those “almost winning” positions into clean points.
2. What you are already doing well
- Opening preparation: Your Najdorf move-orders are up-to-date (…e5 / …Be6 setups and …h6 ideas), and with White you steer Scotch positions toward dynamic piece play. Both choices give you middlegames you understand.
- Tactical alertness: In every recent win you spotted
intermediate moves (e.g. 15…
Nxe4!! in the Scotch) that immediately increase the practical difficulty for your opponent. - Pressure play with the g-pawn: Several
games feature early
g4/g5thrusts that create mating nets or structural weaknesses; this is becoming a personal trademark.
3. Repeating trouble spots
- Time losses in won positions: Four of your last six defeats were “flagged” with a clearly winning or equal position on the board. This is low-hanging fruit: you are giving away 40-50 elo each time you lose on time.
- Over-extension on the queenside versus the English Attack:
In the loss to
CFalcons8you advanced…b5–b4/a5–a4too quickly, lettingNb4–c6andf5/f6rip open your king. The same pattern appears in two earlier games. Consider a more restrained plan with…h5or…Rc8before…b5. - Endgame conversion: In multiple wins you reached easily won endgames but needed 20–30 extra moves to finish. Study a daily dose of technical endings to save clock time and energy later on.
4. Concrete opening tweaks
Sicilian Najdorf (Black)
• After 6.Be3/Be2 lines you often choose the flexible 6…e5
→ …Be6. Add the waiting line 6…e6 7.f3 h6
to your repertoire; it discourages the quick g4 advance and
keeps the structure intact.
Scotch/Italian (White)
• Your move order 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Bc5 is excellent,
but when opponents sidestep with 4…Nf6 you sometimes drift. Spend an
hour on the Mieses Variation clip to have a ready system there.
5. Middlegame themes to study next month
- Exchange sacrifices on c3 / e3: They appear in your Najdorf games but you rarely pull the trigger. A targeted study will broaden your attacking options.
- Minor-piece outposts: Several losses stem
from letting an enemy knight settle on
e5ord6. Review model games on preventing and exploiting strong knights (see outpost). - Switching wings: Train exercises where the attack shifts rapidly from kingside to queenside; this will help you avoid pushing pawns too far on one side.
6. Endgame & time-management plan
• Add 15 min of endgame technique (rook vs. pawn endings, opposite-colour
bishops) to each study session.
• Experiment with one slower daily game (10 + 5 or 15 + 10) to practise
“finishing on the board instead of the clock.”
• During blitz, aim to be under 1:30 only after move 20.
Consider a mental “play simple moves” alarm once your clock dips below
one minute.
7. Progress tracking
Use the dashboards below to watch for measurable improvement:
- Hourly performance trend:
- Day-of-week consistency:
8. Action items for the next two weeks
- Play three 15 + 10 games focusing exclusively on clock control.
- Annotate (briefly) every endgame you enter—win or lose.
- Prepare the “anti-English-Attack” Najdorf line and test it in at least five blitz games.
Good luck, and feel free to send your annotated games for further feedback!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| wintherhausen | 118W / 12L / 2D | |
| 60movesaminute | 80W / 6L / 0D | |
| blixt2009 | 79W / 5L / 0D | |
| desgambit | 66W / 12L / 1D | |
| lepaledicoriolis | 67W / 12L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2444 | 2179 | ||
| 2023 | 2400 | 2173 | ||
| 2022 | 2507 | 2478 | ||
| 2021 | 2502 | |||
| 2020 | 2503 | 2402 | ||
| 2019 | 2322 | 2303 | 2114 | |
| 2018 | 2400 | 2311 | 1803 | 2100 |
| 2017 | 2239 | 2307 | 2000 | 2100 |
| 2016 | 2501 | 2362 | 1496 | |
| 2015 | 2294 | 2298 | 2087 | |
| 2014 | 2286 | 2215 | 2007 | |
| 2013 | 2277 | 2126 | 1969 | |
| 2012 | 2250 | 2081 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 3W / 0L / 2D | 37.7 |
| 2023 | 7W / 5L / 2D | 9W / 6L / 0D | 91.4 |
| 2022 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 93.5 |
| 2021 | 40W / 21L / 2D | 35W / 25L / 1D | 71.8 |
| 2020 | 169W / 19L / 15D | 164W / 26L / 8D | 67.0 |
| 2019 | 1887W / 223L / 33D | 1841W / 261L / 36D | 71.0 |
| 2018 | 5797W / 588L / 109D | 5657W / 715L / 130D | 70.5 |
| 2017 | 2352W / 237L / 46D | 2321W / 254L / 45D | 71.8 |
| 2016 | 38W / 16L / 6D | 36W / 23L / 2D | 85.6 |
| 2015 | 11W / 1L / 0D | 9W / 3L / 0D | 74.0 |
| 2014 | 68W / 18L / 7D | 66W / 24L / 7D | 76.4 |
| 2013 | 42W / 7L / 2D | 34W / 13L / 1D | 72.1 |
| 2012 | 27W / 5L / 3D | 32W / 5L / 1D | 72.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 1958 | 1721 | 197 | 40 | 87.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1838 | 1674 | 132 | 32 | 91.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1765 | 1518 | 206 | 41 | 86.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1366 | 1256 | 97 | 13 | 92.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1281 | 1156 | 99 | 26 | 90.2% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1022 | 856 | 133 | 33 | 83.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 1010 | 908 | 87 | 15 | 89.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 975 | 876 | 91 | 8 | 89.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 900 | 772 | 109 | 19 | 85.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 812 | 719 | 75 | 18 | 88.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 50 | 34 | 15 | 1 | 68.0% |
| Scotch Game | 29 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 79.3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16 | 1 | 9 | 61.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 21 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 81.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 21 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 61.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 20 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 55.0% |
| Slav Defense | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 53.3% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 91.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 108 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |