Avatar of Justin B Burgess

Justin B Burgess NM

Username: 2012VAChamp

Playing Since: 2012-12-20 (Inactive)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟

Chess.com

Daily: 2114
48W / 1L / 1D
Rapid: 2179
4W / 1L / 0D
Blitz: 2444
280W / 112L / 20D
Bullet: 2507
20182W / 2365L / 423D

Justin B Burgess - National Master Extraordinaire

Also known in the digital realm as 2012VAChamp, Justin B Burgess is no ordinary chess player. Earning the prestigious title of National Master, Justin has proven time and again that strategy, patience, and cunning are their closest allies on the 64 squares.

The Journey

Since 2012, Justin has been waging war in the realms of bullet, blitz, rapid, and daily chess—showing impressive versatility. Starting with a bullet rating of 2250 and a blitz rating over 2000, Justin quickly carved out a name as a fierce competitor. In recent years, their rapid rating has soared past 2179, and blitz hovers impressively above 2400. Who said bullet chess isn't for serious players?

Style and Strength

Justin's style can be summarized as a rollercoaster of endurance and nerve. Their average moves per win is about 68, revealing a love for deep, strategic warfare rather than quick tactical skirmishes. This master values the endgame, with a whopping 74% frequency of endgame appearances—clearly they enjoy savoring the final moments of the battle.

When life hits and pieces are lost, fear not! With a come-back rate of 84% and a staggering win rate after losing a piece at nearly 100%, Justin is the phoenix of the chessboard, rising from every setback with renewed vigor.

Records and Streaks

When it comes to winning, Justin takes the cake (and probably eats it too). They boast an awe-inspiring longest winning streak of 108 games, a feat that would make even the fiercest grandmasters sit up and take notice. Currently, the streak rests at zero, but given Justin’s relentless fighting spirit, it’s only a matter of time before the domination resumes.

Opening Secrets

While their exact weaponry is, amusingly, a top secret, their performance with these classified openings is impressive. Winning around 60-90% of games across formats using these mystery openings, opponents probably dread the unknown lines Justin deploys. The element of surprise is clearly an ace up Justin’s sleeve.

Opponent Allies and Rivalries

Justin has faced a vast array of challengers, often walking away victorious. Some opponents yield a perfect 100% defeat rate, while a lucky few still manage to dodge the inevitable (well, 0% wins). Of note, Justin’s win rate against “crazyq2001” stands at a casual 50%, showing even the best have some fun challengers.

Off the Board

An early resignation rate of just under 1% suggests Justin prefers to fight till the last pawn drops, or at least until the coffee kicks in. Their psychological tilt factor is a manageable 8 out of 100, proving they're more zen than panic-stricken when pawns start vanishing mysteriously.

In Summary

Justin B Burgess is a chess force with a blend of wit, resilience, and talent. From bullet blitz battles to the slow, contemplative daily games, this National Master crafts victories with flair and a dash of mystery. Opponents beware—Justin’s chessboard might just be the trickiest puzzle you’ll face this tournament.


Coach's Avatar

Coaching Feedback for Justin B Burgess

1. Big-picture assessment

Your overall results show an experienced attacking player with a solid theoretical base in the Sicilian and Scotch, and a peak strength around 2534 (2023-06-04). You routinely out-calculate opposition rated 200–400 elo lower, but run into trouble against peers because of recurring strategic and time-management issues. The balance of your games suggests that polishing a few specific areas could convert many of those “almost winning” positions into clean points.

2. What you are already doing well

  • Opening preparation: Your Najdorf move-orders are up-to-date (…e5 / …Be6 setups and …h6 ideas), and with White you steer Scotch positions toward dynamic piece play. Both choices give you middlegames you understand.
  • Tactical alertness: In every recent win you spotted intermediate moves (e.g. 15…Nxe4!! in the Scotch) that immediately increase the practical difficulty for your opponent.
  • Pressure play with the g-pawn: Several games feature early g4/g5 thrusts that create mating nets or structural weaknesses; this is becoming a personal trademark.

3. Repeating trouble spots

  • Time losses in won positions: Four of your last six defeats were “flagged” with a clearly winning or equal position on the board. This is low-hanging fruit: you are giving away 40-50 elo each time you lose on time.
  • Over-extension on the queenside versus the English Attack: In the loss to CFalcons8 you advanced …b5–b4/a5–a4 too quickly, letting Nb4–c6 and f5/f6 rip open your king. The same pattern appears in two earlier games. Consider a more restrained plan with …h5 or …Rc8 before …b5.
  • Endgame conversion: In multiple wins you reached easily won endgames but needed 20–30 extra moves to finish. Study a daily dose of technical endings to save clock time and energy later on.

4. Concrete opening tweaks

Sicilian Najdorf (Black)
• After 6.Be3/Be2 lines you often choose the flexible 6…e5  → …Be6. Add the waiting line 6…e6 7.f3 h6 to your repertoire; it discourages the quick g4 advance and keeps the structure intact.

Scotch/Italian (White)
• Your move order 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Bc5 is excellent, but when opponents sidestep with 4…Nf6 you sometimes drift. Spend an hour on the Mieses Variation clip to have a ready system there.

5. Middlegame themes to study next month

  1. Exchange sacrifices on c3 / e3: They appear in your Najdorf games but you rarely pull the trigger. A targeted study will broaden your attacking options.
  2. Minor-piece outposts: Several losses stem from letting an enemy knight settle on e5 or d6. Review model games on preventing and exploiting strong knights (see outpost).
  3. Switching wings: Train exercises where the attack shifts rapidly from kingside to queenside; this will help you avoid pushing pawns too far on one side.

6. Endgame & time-management plan

• Add 15 min of endgame technique (rook vs. pawn endings, opposite-colour bishops) to each study session.
• Experiment with one slower daily game (10 + 5 or 15 + 10) to practise “finishing on the board instead of the clock.”
• During blitz, aim to be under 1:30 only after move 20. Consider a mental “play simple moves” alarm once your clock dips below one minute.

7. Progress tracking

Use the dashboards below to watch for measurable improvement:

  • Hourly performance trend:
    01234567891011121314151617181920212223100%0%Hour of Day
  • Day-of-week consistency:
    MonTueWedThuFriSatSun100%0%Day of Week

8. Action items for the next two weeks

  1. Play three 15 + 10 games focusing exclusively on clock control.
  2. Annotate (briefly) every endgame you enter—win or lose.
  3. Prepare the “anti-English-Attack” Najdorf line and test it in at least five blitz games.

Good luck, and feel free to send your annotated games for further feedback!



🆚 Opponent Insights

Most Played Opponents
wintherhausen 118W / 12L / 2D
60movesaminute 80W / 6L / 0D
blixt2009 79W / 5L / 0D
desgambit 66W / 12L / 1D
lepaledicoriolis 67W / 12L / 0D

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2024 2444 2179
2023 2400 2173
2022 2507 2478
2021 2502
2020 2503 2402
2019 2322 2303 2114
2018 2400 2311 1803 2100
2017 2239 2307 2000 2100
2016 2501 2362 1496
2015 2294 2298 2087
2014 2286 2215 2007
2013 2277 2126 1969
2012 2250 2081
Rating by Year201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202425071496YearRatingBulletBlitzRapidDaily

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2024 1W / 0L / 0D 3W / 0L / 2D 37.7
2023 7W / 5L / 2D 9W / 6L / 0D 91.4
2022 1W / 0L / 0D 1W / 0L / 0D 93.5
2021 40W / 21L / 2D 35W / 25L / 1D 71.8
2020 169W / 19L / 15D 164W / 26L / 8D 67.0
2019 1887W / 223L / 33D 1841W / 261L / 36D 71.0
2018 5797W / 588L / 109D 5657W / 715L / 130D 70.5
2017 2352W / 237L / 46D 2321W / 254L / 45D 71.8
2016 38W / 16L / 6D 36W / 23L / 2D 85.6
2015 11W / 1L / 0D 9W / 3L / 0D 74.0
2014 68W / 18L / 7D 66W / 24L / 7D 76.4
2013 42W / 7L / 2D 34W / 13L / 1D 72.1
2012 27W / 5L / 3D 32W / 5L / 1D 72.7

Openings: Most Played

Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted 1958 1721 197 40 87.9%
Sicilian Defense 1838 1674 132 32 91.1%
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation 1765 1518 206 41 86.0%
Scotch Game 1366 1256 97 13 92.0%
Scandinavian Defense 1281 1156 99 26 90.2%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 1022 856 133 33 83.8%
Amar Gambit 1010 908 87 15 89.9%
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation 975 876 91 8 89.8%
Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation 900 772 109 19 85.8%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 812 719 75 18 88.5%
Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation 50 34 15 1 68.0%
Scotch Game 29 23 4 2 79.3%
Unknown 26 16 1 9 61.5%
Sicilian Defense: Closed 21 17 3 1 81.0%
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation 21 13 5 3 61.9%
Sicilian Defense 20 11 7 2 55.0%
Slav Defense 15 8 6 1 53.3%
French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit 14 7 6 1 50.0%
Amar Gambit 12 11 1 0 91.7%
Caro-Kann Defense 10 9 1 0 90.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 108 0
Losing 8 0