About 2Tilted
Meet 2Tilted, a National Master whose chess prowess has been steadily climbing the ranks since 2017. Known for a tactical comeback rate nearing 91%, 2Tilted’s games are anything but dull – there’s always a chance for a dramatic turnaround, keeping opponents on their toes (and occasionally tilting).
Rating Adventures
Starting from a respectable blitz rating of around 2164 in 2017, 2Tilted pushed through the ranks to reach an impressive peak blitz rating of 2597 in 2021. Bullet fans beware: with highs over 2600, 2Tilted handles lightning-fast games with the coolness of a grandmaster flamboyantly sipping tea.
Style & Strategy
With an endgame frequency of 81.27%, 2Tilted clearly enjoys patiently squeezing out every last advantage. Average moves per win hover around 82; clearly, this player isn't one for quick draws or sprint finishes. And don’t count on early resignations – with a rate below 1%, resilience is key. Games with 2Tilted are marathons, not sprints. Also noteworthy is the stellar 99.93% win rate after losing a piece – because why panic when you’re a National Master?
Competitive Spirit
2Tilted sports an overall blitz win rate just shy of 50%, razor-close to an infallible balance. When it comes to bullet chess, they’re even sweeter with a 50.7% win rate and a tactical mind sharp enough to make quick decisions under fire. Daily games show a jaw-dropping near 95% win rate – that’s some serious consistency in slower formats, proving versatility across time controls.
Psychology & Personality
Despite the username suggesting a hint of frustration, 2Tilted’s tilt factor sits at a modest 23, indicating decent composure even when the chips are down. The player’s ability to bounce back from setbacks is legendary, showing mental grit that’s as impressive as their opening preparation (which remains Top Secret, naturally).
Famous Opponents & Rivalries
Facing a wide array of challengers, 2Tilted boasts perfect or near-perfect win rates against several recent opponents – watch out fischerev7 and fearless17010. And while some foes manage to sneak a few wins, 2Tilted’s competitive fire burns steadily bright against all adversaries, perhaps fueled by that very username.
In Summary
2Tilted is not just a chess player; they’re a whirlwind of calculated resilience, strategic patience, and tactical wizardry. National Master title holder, thrill-seeker of comebacks, and an endgame specialist – their games are worth watching, whether you’re a beginner hoping to learn or a grandmaster trying not to get tilted yourself.
Hi 2Tilted! Here is your personalized post-session feedback
🎯 What you’re already doing well
- Comfortable in queen-less middlegames. Your French/Caro games with the early …Qxd1 exchange show solid piece placement and end-game technique. You outplayed Fearless17010 and others from balanced positions.
- Bishop pair utilisation. Several wins (e.g. vs ImBrianFellows) highlight strong long-diagonal pressure once the board opens.
- End-game conversion. In multiple rook-and-pawn endings you kept calm and pushed passed pawns with good king activity.
🔍 Repeated issues & opportunities
1. Time-management in critical positions
You often drop under 20 s around move 20, especially when out of book. In the Najdorf loss below you fell behind on both clock and position:
Tip: Adopt a “30/70” rule – spend ~30 % of the clock on the first 15 moves, leaving 70 % for the rest. Work in some increment games to rehearse playing accurately with 5-10 s on the clock.
2. Thin coverage against mainline Sicilians
The g3/Nd2 set-up is flexible but produced passive pieces and long-term weaknesses. Consider adding one structured main line (Najdorf 6.Be2 or 6.Bg5, or Anti-Sicilian 3.Bb5+) so you enter positions you’ve studied, not improvised.
3. Black vs. 1.d4 – piece placement before pawn storms
In the East-Indian loss to lepolatupukki you pushed …a5/…a4/…d6/…e5 too quickly and ceded dark-square control. Try switching to a more solid plan (…d5 structures or a classical Nimzo-Indian) so your development finishes before pawn thrusts.
4. Over-relying on early queen trades as White
The 2.Nf3 d3 dxe4 Qxd1+ lines score well now, but stronger opponents will equalise quickly. Begin mixing in sharper variations (Tarrasch vs French, Panov vs Caro-Kann) to develop open-center skills.
📈 When do you play best?
From your stats it looks like you peak around
and tend to struggle late night. Schedule important rated sessions accordingly. Your mid-week score () is noticeably higher than weekend blitz – useful to know before tournaments!🚀 Action plan for the next two weeks
- Opening focus: Build a Najdorf “emergency kit” – 10 model games + 10 tactical motifs. Review one per day.
- Clock discipline drill: Play 10 games at 3 + 2, aiming to have ≥ 1 min on move 20. If you drop below, annotate why.
- Dark-square strategy: Solve 20 puzzles featuring Prophylaxis on the dark squares – your black losses often stem from ignoring these.
- End-game refinement: Keep sharpening – you’re good here. Work through two chapter endings from Silman’s “Complete Endgame Course” or a comparable source.
🏆 Keep an eye on your milestones
Your current blitz peak stands at 2597 (2021-12-03). With the tweaks above, 2500 is well within reach.
See you at the next training session – and good luck on the board!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lupita Rodas | 32W / 59L / 6D | View Games |
| ttaamm | 96W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| Never_walk_alone | 45W / 25L / 5D | View Games |
| Alan Stein | 27W / 42L / 4D | View Games |
| Carlos Andres Perdomo | 28W / 24L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2482 | |||
| 2024 | 2407 | |||
| 2023 | 2515 | 2473 | ||
| 2022 | 2455 | 2371 | 2148 | 1723 |
| 2021 | 2459 | 2478 | 1850 | 1820 |
| 2020 | 2274 | 2452 | 1808 | |
| 2019 | 2251 | 2235 | 1697 | |
| 2018 | 2236 | 2392 | 1830 | |
| 2017 | 2300 | 2164 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9W / 2L / 1D | 5W / 3L / 2D | 86.3 |
| 2024 | 6W / 9L / 0D | 7W / 7L / 2D | 72.6 |
| 2023 | 346W / 284L / 58D | 316W / 313L / 55D | 86.5 |
| 2022 | 1088W / 738L / 116D | 1075W / 741L / 131D | 82.1 |
| 2021 | 853W / 693L / 127D | 763W / 781L / 117D | 84.6 |
| 2020 | 432W / 336L / 48D | 373W / 379L / 66D | 81.1 |
| 2019 | 461W / 406L / 84D | 448W / 444L / 70D | 82.0 |
| 2018 | 1105W / 964L / 152D | 1089W / 1037L / 126D | 82.7 |
| 2017 | 143W / 89L / 17D | 131W / 103L / 9D | 77.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 357 | 164 | 160 | 33 | 45.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 353 | 170 | 148 | 35 | 48.2% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 300 | 157 | 116 | 27 | 52.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 275 | 145 | 115 | 15 | 52.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 271 | 137 | 120 | 14 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 264 | 120 | 126 | 18 | 45.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 253 | 119 | 115 | 19 | 47.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 236 | 109 | 101 | 26 | 46.2% |
| Australian Defense | 233 | 120 | 100 | 13 | 51.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 215 | 111 | 90 | 14 | 51.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 433 | 229 | 187 | 17 | 52.9% |
| Australian Defense | 265 | 133 | 112 | 20 | 50.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 260 | 124 | 113 | 23 | 47.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 247 | 132 | 104 | 11 | 53.4% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 192 | 96 | 78 | 18 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 162 | 77 | 80 | 5 | 47.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 149 | 70 | 65 | 14 | 47.0% |
| Döry Defense | 148 | 58 | 83 | 7 | 39.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 147 | 78 | 57 | 12 | 53.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 134 | 56 | 71 | 7 | 41.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 30 | 0 |
| Losing | 23 | 1 |