Profile: advancedrook
Candidate Master of the Chess World
Meet advancedrook, a formidable force on the 64 squares and a proud holder of the prestigious FIDE title Candidate Master. This is no mere player; advancedrook is a gladiator of blitz battles, a rapid tactician, and a daily chess enthusiast who’s danced with both victory and defeat on the battlefield.
With a peak bullet rating of 2986 achieved in May 2025, advancedrook proves lightning-fast reflexes and razor-sharp tactics go hand in hand. Not to be outshined, their blitz rating soared to a stunning 2803 in March 2025, while their rapid play peaked at a solid 2460. If the chessboard were a stage, advancedrook’s performances would be standing ovations every time.
Tenacity is their middle name, boasting an incredible 29-game winning streak at their best, and while losses happen to the best of us (with a “best” losing streak of 13), advancedrook never surrenders. With a comeback rate nearing 85%, this player turns near-disasters into triumphs, leaving opponents wondering if their queen was really safe to take.
Playing Style and Personality
Don’t expect patience — advancedrook thrives in chaos. Their games average about 74 moves to win, proving they enjoy undulating battles with plenty of twists and turns. Known for their solid endgame prowess (averaging nearly 79 moves even in losses), they keep opponents on their toes until the very end.
Funny thing about advancedrook: their psychological tilt factor is surprisingly low at 13%, meaning rage-quitting with a throw of the mouse? Not on their watch. And their best hour to play? The chess gods smile at 10 AM — an ideal morning strategist with a cup of coffee (or three).
Repertoire Highlights
- Blitz Specialty: The mysterious Top Secret openings (9,690 games!) mixed with a dash of Nimzo-Indian Defense and the elusive Reti Opening keep opponents guessing.
- Rapid and Daily: Dominated by the trusty Top Secret and the Sicilian Defense, showcasing versatility across time controls.
- Bullet Battles: A wildly diverse arsenal, with over 21,000 games including the Englund Gambit and Van t Kruijs Opening, proving adaptability even in the fastest of games.
Recent Memorable Moment
On May 31, 2025, advancedrook dazzled with a swift victory against NoHeThTo, clinching a checkmate in a nail-biting 40-move duel featuring the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack. Their fierce precision turned the tides and sent their opponent’s king into a trap that was as elegant as it was brutal.
Fun Fact
Despite the nickname “rook,” advancedrook’s wins by resignation outnumber those by checkmate, suggesting a knack for putting opponents in situations so dire they’d rather quit than get roasted on the board.
Whether blitzing through bullet games or thoughtfully navigating daily rated matches, advancedrook embodies the spirit of chess with a blend of strategic mastery, tactical alertness, and maybe a hint of secret sauce.
What stands out in your recent daily games
You show strong willingness to try a wide range of openings and you often reach sharp middlegame positions where your piece activity and tactical awareness can shine. When you get a good initiative, you convert it into material or positional pressure, which is a sign of solid calculation and practical play.
- You perform well in several Queen's Gambit and related lines, steering toward practical middlegames where your pieces coordinate well.
- You have shown strong results in several Sicilian lines and aggressive setups (Amazon Attack and its variations), indicating comfort with dynamic, imbalanced games.
- Your willingness to diversify (different defenses and variations) helps prevent routine preparation from becoming a weakness.
Opening performance snapshot
Your openings data suggests you are especially successful in several lines within the Queen's Gambit family and in main Sicilian lines. In particular, multiple 8-game samples in Queen's Gambit Accepted/Declined variants and several Sicilian lines show high win rates. You also have positive results in aggressive setups like Amar Gambit and some Amazon Attack lines, though those samples are smaller and should be treated as directional rather than definitive proof.
- Queen's Gambit family lines (with early e3 or Nc3) show strong results across multiple games.
- Main Sicilian lines appear to fit your style, yielding solid to excellent performance when you navigate the typical middlegame plans well.
- Some aggressive, offbeat lines (Amazon Attack variants) are working for you, but keep in mind small sample sizes can skew the picture. It’s worth continuing to study their typical responses to maintain reliability.
Key areas to improve
- Deepen your opening-to-middlegame plans. For the lines you like, build a concise set of typical middlegame ideas (release of pieces, common pawn breaks, and typical piece manoeuvres) so you have a clear plan after the first 15 moves.
- Endgame conversion and simplification: in several games, execution after exchanges could be sharper. Practice common rook endings and queen endgames, focusing on converting advantages and resisting counterplay.
- Time and move choice discipline in long daily games: ensure you have a lightweight, repeatable approach for the first 20-25 moves, so you don’t drift into over-optimistic or risky lines when you’re low on time or mentally fatigued.
- Identify and neutralize common tactical threats you’ve faced. When opponents activate their bishops or knights with tempo, have ready a few constructive defensive resources or forcing exchanges to relieve pressure.
Practice plan and next steps
- Focus opening study on 2-3 lines where your results are strongest (for example, a solid Queen's Gambit approach and a main Sicilian line). Build a short reference sheet with:
- Key developing moves and typical piece placements
- 3 standard middlegame plans for each line
- Common tactical motifs you should watch for
- Develop a targeted endgame drill routine:
- Rook endgames with pawns on both sides
- Opposite-color bishop endings and basic king activity
- Improve time management with a simple in-game plan:
- Allocate a fixed amount of time to the opening phase (e.g., first 15 moves)
- Set a rough pace to avoid back-loading decisions in the middlegame
- In daily analysis, after a game, spend 15 minutes on a focused review:
- Identify the turning point where you gained or lost the initiative
- Note one alternative plan you could have played at that moment
Notes on rating trends and momentum
Your data indicates positive momentum over longer horizons, with mid-term improvements visible. Pair that momentum with consistent study and a steady opening plan to maintain and accelerate growth. If you feel a plateau in any window, tie it to a concrete practice target (e.g., one new endgame concept per week or two games reviewed with a coach) to push through.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ariecheque | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jethrovv | 3W / 5L / 1D | View |
| willixm | 20W / 22L / 2D | View |
| Arnar Erwin Gunnarsson | 63W / 48L / 6D | View |
| b92414 | 89W / 135L / 4D | View |
| 🪳🪲Just a glamorous cockroach | 75W / 30L / 6D | View |
| Tugstumur Yesuntumur | 2W / 4L / 0D | View |
| murlam90 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| imabod1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| TheUnderDog001 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shelev Oberoi | 249W / 255L / 37D | View Games |
| b92414 | 89W / 135L / 4D | View Games |
| Andy Woodward | 11W / 139L / 8D | View Games |
| Arnar Erwin Gunnarsson | 63W / 48L / 6D | View Games |
| rkdkchess | 56W / 56L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2816 | 2698 | 2439 | 1665 |
| 2024 | 2733 | 2593 | 2422 | 1599 |
| 2023 | 2608 | 2528 | 2405 | 1287 |
| 2022 | 2553 | 2351 | 2237 | 968 |
| 2021 | 2430 | 2265 | 2132 | 1480 |
| 2020 | 2256 | 2117 | 2052 | 1062 |
| 2019 | 1310 | 1431 | 1450 | |
| 2018 | 1205 | 1113 | 1266 | 958 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1387W / 1140L / 178D | 1291W / 1229L / 165D | 85.6 |
| 2024 | 1453W / 900L / 154D | 1397W / 956L / 159D | 86.7 |
| 2023 | 2326W / 1482L / 223D | 2144W / 1667L / 259D | 83.3 |
| 2022 | 1281W / 980L / 158D | 1154W / 1157L / 140D | 81.3 |
| 2021 | 1549W / 1363L / 173D | 1551W / 1398L / 156D | 76.3 |
| 2020 | 1514W / 1274L / 152D | 1398W / 1404L / 134D | 71.8 |
| 2019 | 177W / 109L / 12D | 150W / 132L / 10D | 65.2 |
| 2018 | 359W / 324L / 18D | 361W / 322L / 23D | 57.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 544 | 301 | 203 | 40 | 55.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 449 | 240 | 184 | 25 | 53.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation | 351 | 176 | 158 | 17 | 50.1% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 343 | 193 | 124 | 26 | 56.3% |
| Slav Defense | 335 | 198 | 118 | 19 | 59.1% |
| Australian Defense | 288 | 159 | 114 | 15 | 55.2% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 264 | 123 | 116 | 25 | 46.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 247 | 118 | 111 | 18 | 47.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 247 | 138 | 99 | 10 | 55.9% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 241 | 115 | 104 | 22 | 47.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 65 | 38 | 24 | 3 | 58.5% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 64 | 35 | 27 | 2 | 54.7% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 55 | 38 | 14 | 3 | 69.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 52 | 32 | 17 | 3 | 61.5% |
| Australian Defense | 49 | 29 | 18 | 2 | 59.2% |
| Slav Defense | 49 | 33 | 15 | 1 | 67.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 38 | 15 | 21 | 2 | 39.5% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 37 | 21 | 14 | 2 | 56.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 37 | 16 | 18 | 3 | 43.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 35 | 17 | 15 | 3 | 48.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Slav Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1278 | 685 | 531 | 62 | 53.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 1069 | 525 | 477 | 67 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 927 | 509 | 366 | 52 | 54.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 869 | 485 | 351 | 33 | 55.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 791 | 373 | 376 | 42 | 47.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 774 | 388 | 355 | 31 | 50.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 721 | 358 | 326 | 37 | 49.6% |
| Slav Defense | 664 | 377 | 250 | 37 | 56.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 629 | 318 | 283 | 28 | 50.6% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 584 | 345 | 207 | 32 | 59.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 29 | 1 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |