Avatar of Ottomar Ladva

Ottomar Ladva GM

Username: agser

Playing Since: 2010-12-10 (Inactive)

Wow Factor: ♟♟

Chess.com

Blitz: 2383
419W / 328L / 84D
Bullet: 2972
797W / 647L / 96D

Grandmaster Ottomar Ladva: The Chessboard's Biotic Wonder

In the vast ecosystem of chess, Ottomar Ladva stands tall as a formidable Grandmaster with a dynamic playing style that’s as adaptive as a chameleon in the wild. Known by the username agser, Ottomar has evolved from humble beginnings — starting with a Blitz rating of 1116 in 2010 — to reaching explosive peak ratings: a Blitz high of 2853 and an outstanding Bullet rating soaring near 2864. This growth curve rivals the most rapid cellular mitosis!

Ottomar’s gametes? Speedy logic and tactical prowess. His Blitz and Bullet records boast win rates above 52%, showing precision in both rapid-fire and sudden-death maneuvers. Defensive resilience is also in Ottomar’s genetic makeup, with a comeback rate of over 63% — an impressive ability to regenerate winning momentum even after losing a key piece.

The Grandmaster’s style has a healthy metabolism of long endgames, with an endgame frequency nearing 63%, proving that Ottomar likes to nurture positions to full bloom rather than settling for quick resolutions—championing the motto: “Don’t just survive the middle game, thrive through the endgame!” Ottomar also has a respectable average moves per win tallying almost 62, demonstrating patience, strategic synthesis, and the tenacity of a true chess organism.

Ottomar’s psychological balance is finely tuned with a tilt factor of 24, keeping composure in pressure-cooker situations, and enjoys a comfortable edge when transitioning from casual to rated matches—a true sign of evolutionary fitness in competitive arenas.

Facing opponents with sharp claws and teeth, Ottomar exhibits a win rate punctuated by some stellar performances against a variety of adversaries—scoring over 75% wins in major showdowns and racking up a longest winning streak of an impressive 17 consecutive victories. Like a territorial creature, he knows when to pounce decisively.

Ottomar Ladva, or “agser” in the digital biosphere, is a living example that chess mastery is an excellent adaptation of intellect, patience, and tactical regeneration — making the 64 squares a thriving habitat for grand strategies and evolutionary triumphs.


Coach's Avatar

Hi Ottomar, here is some tailored feedback to help you sharpen your online-rapid play.

1. Opening trends

  • Your recent White games feature a mix of 1.e4 and 1.Nf3 systems, but the middlegame plans occasionally drift. Consider tightening your repertoire around one core structure so that pattern recognition kicks in faster under the 3-minute clock.
  • Against …Nc6 e5 set-ups (e.g. Three-Knights), you handled the early Bg4/Bc5 pins well but allowed …g5 to chase the bishop and weaken your own king (see move 8 of the loss vs. LeondeKlerk). A quicker h3 or d4, or simply declining Bg5 altogether, keeps the centre intact.
  • With Black you sometimes answer random flank openings too casually (…a6, …a5, …h6, …h5) and get hit by the cheap Qxf7/Qxf2 tricks. A simple rule: if the opponent’s queen can land on f7/f2 in one go, ensure that square is defended before playing a pawn move on the rim.

2. Tactical vigilance

Your wins show excellent conversion when you seize the initiative (e.g. 1.e3 Bc4 Qf3 Qxf7#). Yet several lost games are 10-move miniatures on the very same theme—evidence that you sometimes “mirror” the opponent’s bad play. Force yourself to ask one extra blunder-check question every move: “What is my least-defended square?”

3. Time management

Average clock usage in the win streak: 55–65 seconds remaining at finish. In the losses: often under 15 seconds by move 25, even when the position is equal. Concrete tip: commit to reaching move 15 with at least 1:45 on the clock; if not, tighten your opening prep or adopt a default safe move (…Nf6, …e6, castling) instead of burning time on perfect moves.

4. Psychological edges

  • When facing sub-2000 opponents, you tend to experiment. That’s fine for variety, but sprinkle in a few “main-line” games each session to maintain discipline.
  • Use the first three moves to gauge the opponent’s speed. If they premove instantly, switch to a solid, pawn-grinding structure—bullet instincts make it harder for them to shift gears.

5. Micro-goals for the next week

  1. Play 20 games starting with 1.d4 as White; aim for 80 % score and zero games ended by cheap mates.
  2. Daily 10-minute tactics session focused on queen sacrifices & back-rank motifs.
  3. Record your thought process for one game and annotate three critical moments (
    ).

6. Progress trackers

Visualise your momentum with the widgets below—pin them to your dashboard so you immediately see when fatigue kicks in.

0123451011121314151617181920212223100%0%Hour of Day

MonTueWedThuFriSatSun100%0%Day of Week

7. Quick reference

Your current peaks: Blitz 2853 (2020-04-26), Rapid 2543 (2018-03-13). Keep an eye on the Blitz mark; you are one solid session away from a new personal best.

8. Inspirational game to revisit

Replay your cleanest convert-to-rook-ending win (Paul66666, 27 Apr) and notice how early pawn breaks (d4-c5) secured space before the time scramble.


Good luck, Ottomar! Keep the energy high, the king safe, and the clock under control.



🆚 Opponent Insights

Most Played Opponents
Yannick Gozzoli 59W / 90L / 13D
Krantss 75W / 13L / 0D
tigranlpetrosyan 35W / 44L / 5D
estoniasfinest28 41W / 35L / 0D
Basheer Alqudaimi 33W / 16L / 4D

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2020 2383
2019 2145 2500
2018 2728 2543
2017 2822 2620
2016 2811 2592
2015 2139
2010 1592
Rating by Year201020152016201720182019202028221592YearRatingBulletBlitzRapid

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2020 37W / 22L / 0D 30W / 15L / 2D 12.7
2019 77W / 46L / 3D 90W / 52L / 1D 9.6
2018 22W / 5L / 4D 11W / 13L / 6D 93.5
2017 301W / 214L / 47D 280W / 238L / 43D 90.7
2016 458W / 347L / 40D 490W / 341L / 46D 64.4
2015 1W / 0L / 0D 1W / 0L / 1D 61.7
2010 2W / 1L / 0D 1W / 1L / 0D 45.8

Openings: Most Played

Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Unknown 786 505 281 0 64.2%
Amar Gambit 32 15 15 2 46.9%
Modern 31 17 14 0 54.8%
English Opening: Agincourt Defense 31 11 19 1 35.5%
Döry Defense 31 15 11 5 48.4%
Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit 31 14 16 1 45.2%
Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation 29 15 12 2 51.7%
English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System 24 14 5 5 58.3%
Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation 21 11 7 3 52.4%
King's Indian Attack 20 11 8 1 55.0%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit 101 51 45 5 50.5%
Modern 94 52 38 4 55.3%
Amar Gambit 93 45 42 6 48.4%
Unknown 91 65 26 0 71.4%
English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System 73 41 22 10 56.2%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 63 33 26 4 52.4%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 55 31 22 2 56.4%
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense 46 24 18 4 52.2%
Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation 45 26 14 5 57.8%
King's Indian Attack 37 21 15 1 56.8%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 17 0
Losing 24 2