Alan Zhang - National Master Extraordinaire
Alan Zhang, also known in the digital realms as AlanZhang, holds the prestigious title of National Master awarded by National Chess Federation. From humble beginnings with blitz ratings barely cruising past 1000 in 2012, Alan's star has steadily risen—some might say with the precision and patience of a well-calculated Sicilian Defense.
Rise Through the Ranks
Starting out with blitz rating fluctuations that would make even the calmest grandmaster twitch (max 1065 to a min 809 back in the day), Alan has since blitzed past the 2300 mark—a level where the chess world begins to whisper “watch out, we have a contender!” Their transition from nail-biting losses to consistent wins is evidence that Alan has mastered the art of not just playing chess, but owning the board.
Playing Styles and Quirks
- Early Resignation Rate: 19.52% – Apparently, Alan knows when the ship is sinking but probably prefers to bail just before the waterfall. Smart or premature? The jury’s still out.
- Endgame Enthusiast: Alan frequently sails into endgames, boasting a 54.69% endgame frequency—because who doesn’t love a good finale?
- Average Moves Per Win: 58.4 moves – Alan does not rush to victory; every win is a saga.
- Comeback King/Queen: With a fantastic comeback rate of 71.38%, Alan refuses to lie down, even if they've lost a piece — and with a 97.08% win rate after losing a piece, opponents better watch their material count!
Online Battlefield Prowess
Alan has battled consistently online, with a combined blitz record featuring over a thousand wins (1,132 wins out of 2,186 blitz games!), showing not just tenacity but a knack for tactical fireworks. Bullet games seem to spark the most joy, where Alan enjoys a healthy 55.5% win rate. As for daily and rapid formats, Alan keeps solid stats without breaking a sweat.
Psychological Makeup
Every chess warrior faces the mental battlefield, and Alan is no exception: a tilt factor of 36 shows some irritation when things go south, but nothing they can’t shake off. Interestingly, Alan performs slightly better in rated games compared to casual ones, proving when the stakes are high, the heart races faster.
Favorite Opening: Top Secret
Ah, the mystery of Alan's opening repertoire. With the enigmatic "Top Secret" opening claiming the highest usage across all time controls, opponents are left scratching their heads. How does one prepare against an opening nobody knows? Alan doesn’t just play chess, they play mind games.
Fun Facts and Trivia
- Longest winning streak? A handsome 14 games. The current streak? Well, no fear, the flame is simply resting.
- Has a better win rate on White pieces (52.56%) than on Black, proving Alan likes to start strong.
- Strangely, at 9 AM, their success dips to 13.04%. Sleep in, Alan, or have your morning coffee!
- Greatest tactical strength: bouncing back from losing a piece almost guarantees a win. Alan’s opponents better guard those knights and bishops!
With a combination of tenacity, clever tactics, and a very mysterious opening choice, Alan Zhang continues to carve a name in the chess world worthy of grandmaster memes and national accolades alike. Whether blitzing through opponents or grinding in endgames, Alan proves that true mastery comes one move at a time—preferably a Top Secret one.
Feedback for Alan Zhang
Hi Alan, I’ve reviewed some of your recent games and here are some constructive points to consider to help you improve your chess performance:
Strengths
- Opening Initiative and Tactical Awareness: In your recent win with White, you demonstrated strong opening play, especially in lines like the King’s Knight Variation and the Scandinavian Defense, often achieving quick tactical gains (e.g. the quick strike with 16. Qxf7+ followed by a mating net). This shows good calculation skills and an ability to capitalize on opponent inaccuracies early on.
- Endgame Technique: Your wins often show good understanding of converting small advantages and pressing until resignation or checkmate, indicating solid endgame fundamentals for your rating level.
- Active Piece Play: You consistently develop pieces actively and create threats, applying pressure on your opponents and forcing defensive moves.
Areas for Improvement
- Time Management: Some losses appear to be influenced by time pressure. Improving your pacing during the middlegame will help reduce blunders and rushed decisions. Practice using your clock effectively, especially in longer time controls.
- Handling Complex Positions: In games where you faced stronger opponents or complicated structures (like the Sicilian and French Defense variations), there were moments where you lost control of key squares or allowed counterplay. Focus on deepening your strategic understanding of typical pawn structures and plan formulation in these openings.
- Defensive Resilience: There were a couple of games where you lost due to decisive tactical shots by your opponents or positional pressure. Working on spotting threats earlier and reinforcing your king’s safety can help minimize these losses.
- Opening Repertoire Consistency: Occasionally, the choice of lines (e.g., sharp gambit-type openings) can put you in risky tactical skirmishes that don't always work out. Consider balancing your repertoire with some solid, strategically sound openings to reduce volatility and build consistent performance.
Suggestions for Next Steps
- Review and analyze your recent losses carefully, focusing on critical moments where the balance tipped. Alan Zhang pays off when you learn from those games.
- Incorporate tactical training into your routine daily — puzzles and motif drills targeting forks, pins, and mating patterns will reinforce your natural attacking talent.
- Study some classic endgames and key pawn structures in your preferred openings to deepen positional understanding.
- Practice slower time controls to improve your calculation and positional planning under less time pressure. may help identify your most effective training times.
Example Highlight
Here is a nice tactical victory you recently achieved:
From your game on 2025.05.03 (Win by Checkmate):
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 g6 3. Nxe5 Bd6 4. Nc4 b5 5. Nxd6+ cxd6 6. Bxb5 a6 7. Bc4 Nf6 8. Nc3 Bb7 9. d3 d5 10. exd5 Nxd5 11. Nxd5 Bxd5 12. Bxd5 Ra7 13. O-O O-O 14. Bh6 Re8 15. Qf3 Re5 16. Qxf7+ Kh8 17. Bg7#
This game demonstrates excellent calculation, initiative, and finishing technique.
Keep up the good work, and focus on the suggested areas for improvement. With consistent practice and careful analysis, you will continue to strengthen your skills and achieve even better results.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| skytzo985 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| nukintolegen | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| deki1962 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| tonygjomemo | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Osvaldo Antonio Butti | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nerdsplayingchess | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| davidson_gois | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| maanyarao123 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| el-deivi20 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| prettyflyforaraiguy | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Justin Chen | 12W / 39L / 3D | View Games |
| cym143 | 15W / 19L / 3D | View Games |
| Daniel Girsh | 14W / 19L / 2D | View Games |
| bobthebuilderpviaowr | 10W / 10L / 3D | View Games |
| bookwormpawn | 11W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2377 | 2232 | 2114 | 1959 |
| 2024 | 2261 | 2114 | 1959 | |
| 2023 | 2377 | 2249 | 2107 | 1982 |
| 2022 | 2112 | 2213 | 1966 | |
| 2021 | 2220 | 2213 | 1993 | |
| 2020 | 2140 | 2213 | 1954 | |
| 2019 | 1793 | 2032 | 1949 | 1859 |
| 2018 | 1798 | 1993 | 1841 | 1913 |
| 2017 | 1505 | 1884 | 1461 | 1698 |
| 2016 | 1386 | 1473 | 1448 | 1398 |
| 2015 | 1122 | 1147 | 1346 | 1163 |
| 2014 | 1040 | 1100 | 1349 | 1241 |
| 2013 | 1010 | 1029 | 1405 | 1026 |
| 2012 | 787 | 981 | 1167 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 43W / 24L / 1D | 32W / 30L / 5D | 53.0 |
| 2024 | 60W / 43L / 2D | 61W / 42L / 7D | 74.4 |
| 2023 | 192W / 124L / 18D | 192W / 139L / 15D | 72.6 |
| 2022 | 17W / 17L / 2D | 16W / 13L / 4D | 55.9 |
| 2021 | 48W / 28L / 4D | 40W / 28L / 10D | 72.7 |
| 2020 | 117W / 103L / 16D | 107W / 109L / 16D | 74.9 |
| 2019 | 72W / 42L / 2D | 55W / 48L / 8D | 56.8 |
| 2018 | 116W / 72L / 4D | 114W / 75L / 6D | 56.4 |
| 2017 | 110W / 42L / 4D | 97W / 60L / 5D | 47.7 |
| 2016 | 47W / 58L / 1D | 55W / 39L / 5D | 51.0 |
| 2015 | 60W / 86L / 4D | 51W / 82L / 4D | 46.6 |
| 2014 | 78W / 133L / 1D | 62W / 146L / 6D | 38.4 |
| 2013 | 172W / 138L / 3D | 136W / 171L / 10D | 45.0 |
| 2012 | 200W / 176L / 5D | 196W / 168L / 5D | 41.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 106 | 74 | 2 | 58.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 85 | 39 | 42 | 4 | 45.9% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 68 | 31 | 36 | 1 | 45.6% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 65 | 37 | 25 | 3 | 56.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 64 | 33 | 26 | 5 | 51.6% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 60 | 26 | 31 | 3 | 43.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 51 | 23 | 25 | 3 | 45.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 50 | 25 | 24 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 46 | 25 | 19 | 2 | 54.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 45 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 48.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 20 | 64 | 0 | 23.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 56 | 23 | 33 | 0 | 41.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 33 | 17 | 12 | 4 | 51.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 26 | 9 | 15 | 2 | 34.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 26 | 15 | 11 | 0 | 57.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 26 | 9 | 17 | 0 | 34.6% |
| Australian Defense | 21 | 6 | 14 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 19 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 52.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 16 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 172 | 104 | 65 | 3 | 60.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 59 | 36 | 23 | 0 | 61.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 53 | 28 | 23 | 2 | 52.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 48 | 31 | 17 | 0 | 64.6% |
| Philidor Defense | 46 | 25 | 19 | 2 | 54.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 43 | 31 | 11 | 1 | 72.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 41 | 14 | 26 | 1 | 34.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 40 | 24 | 16 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 36 | 27 | 8 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 35 | 23 | 12 | 0 | 65.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 43 | 25 | 18 | 0 | 58.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 41 | 26 | 14 | 1 | 63.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 31 | 16 | 15 | 0 | 51.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 18 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 72.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Czech Defense | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 53.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 64.3% |
| Scotch Game | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Petrov's Defense | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 36 | 0 |