Alenzer: A Chess Journey
Alenzer first appeared on the chess scene around early 2018, starting with a Blitz rating that hovered slightly above the 1100 mark. Through consistent competition and a determined study of the game, their Blitz rating has soared at times beyond 2700–demonstrating both dedication and rapid improvement over just a few years.
A versatile player, Alenzer does not limit themselves to standard chess alone. They have competed in numerous variants—including Three-Check, Chess960, and Crazyhouse—often achieving impressively high win rates in these alternative formats. Their skill extends across multiple time controls too, with competitive experiences in Bullet, Rapid, and Daily chess. Notably, their Bullet sessions have gone from modest beginnings to ratings over the 2000 mark, showcasing both stamina and the ability to thrive under shorter time constraints.
When it comes to raw statistics, Alenzer’s game record tells an engaging story. Their average wins can stretch well into lengthy endgames, reflecting a fondness for fighting on until the very last tactical chance. In fact, they close out some tough battles with a remarkable Comeback Rate of over 80%, indicating an unyielding spirit and an uncanny ability to turn the tide even under dire material deficits. Additionally, a One-Sided Loss Rate of barely over 1% reveals a dogged determination to avoid quick collapses.
This fighting spirit is further exemplified by a longest winning streak of nine games and an above-average success rate when playing with either color. Alenzer’s results also differ by time of play—some of their best performances unfold on Monday evenings, fitting neatly into a schedule that complements their motivational peak.
Overall, Alenzer is known for fearless tenacity, an appetite for variety, and a steady competitive streak. Whether pushing pawns in a classical match or mixing strategy with fun in a chess variant, Alenzer remains a formidable adversary, ever willing to adapt and learn. Their commitment to steady progress, combined with a flair for dramatic comebacks, keeps each new game as exciting as the last.
Performance Review and Feedback for Alena Nikulina
Alena, you have demonstrated solid play in your recent games with notable strengths and some areas to focus on for improvement. Here’s a detailed analysis based on your recent wins and losses:
Strengths
- Opening Preparation: You are comfortable with mainline openings such as the Ruy Lopez, French Defense, and Queen’s Gambit Accepted, which puts you in good positions early in the game.
- Active Piece Play: In your wins, you show excellent ability in activating your pieces effectively and creating tactical threats that force your opponents to misstep.
- Endgame Technique: Several games demonstrate your skill in converting material advantage into a winning endgame, through precise calculation and good king activity.
- Resourcefulness: Even in challenging positions, you maintain composure and find resourceful moves, such as well-timed exchanges and counterplay.
Areas for Improvement
- Handling Pressure in Complex Positions: Some of your losses indicate difficulty in tight spots, particularly in pawn structure weaknesses or under pressure in middle games. Focus on improving your understanding of positional nuances and pawn dynamics to increase resilience.
- Time Management: Paying attention to clock usage is important, especially in blitz games. Avoid spending too much time early on so you have ample time to calculate critical positions later.
- Tactical Oversights: There were moments where small tactical errors led to material loss or compromised positions. Regular tactical training will help sharpen your vision and prevent such mistakes.
- Opening Variety: While you show good command of your usual openings, working on expanding your repertoire could make you less predictable and help you face a wider variety of opponents confidently.
Suggestions for Next Steps
- Study pawn structures and strategic plans within your preferred openings, including typical weaknesses and strengths.
- Practice solving complex tactical puzzles daily to improve calculation speed and accuracy.
- Review your lost games carefully to understand critical turning points with the help of engine analysis or a coach.
- In blitz games, develop a consistent time control strategy to balance speed and precision.
- Experiment with a new opening once comfortable with your current repertoire to increase your flexibility.
Keep up the good work, Alena! With continued practice and focused study, you will see steady improvement and greater consistency in your results.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| minemech | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| eldurodefreyre | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| jin-mugen | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Tyrell Harriott | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| coachsuhaas | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Marcal Gomez Navais | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| rogeriomuller | 3W / 1L / 0D | View |
| naaats888 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Viktor Parfenov | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| ananya2898 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gaioz Nigalidze | 4W / 20L / 3D | View Games |
| sacred575 | 18W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| jvg164 | 9W / 3L / 2D | View Games |
| Alexander Reprintsev | 0W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
| rachidhuilda | 3W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2167 | 2174 | ||
| 2024 | 2033 | 2254 | 1567 | |
| 2023 | 2037 | 2070 | ||
| 2022 | 2193 | 1567 | ||
| 2021 | 1530 | 2126 | 1450 | |
| 2020 | 1643 | 2021 | 1523 | |
| 2019 | 1831 | 1981 | 1900 | 1483 |
| 2018 | 1942 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 170W / 309L / 39D | 180W / 346L / 23D | 76.5 |
| 2024 | 51W / 134L / 11D | 57W / 126L / 16D | 81.4 |
| 2023 | 31W / 86L / 10D | 40W / 84L / 10D | 84.0 |
| 2022 | 3W / 6L / 0D | 6W / 6L / 0D | 73.8 |
| 2021 | 15W / 22L / 1D | 15W / 20L / 2D | 79.4 |
| 2020 | 50W / 60L / 7D | 46W / 66L / 8D | 72.4 |
| 2019 | 109W / 89L / 9D | 99W / 102L / 10D | 71.9 |
| 2018 | 51W / 27L / 5D | 56W / 30L / 2D | 68.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 158 | 60 | 88 | 10 | 38.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 122 | 45 | 70 | 7 | 36.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 121 | 48 | 66 | 7 | 39.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 89 | 30 | 51 | 8 | 33.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 83 | 23 | 57 | 3 | 27.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 68 | 24 | 35 | 9 | 35.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 67 | 19 | 41 | 7 | 28.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 62 | 27 | 35 | 0 | 43.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 59 | 13 | 42 | 4 | 22.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 56 | 21 | 33 | 2 | 37.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 19 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 42.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 16 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 37.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 13 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 38.5% |
| Modern | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Scotch Gambit, Anderssen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 0 |
| Losing | 16 | 2 |