Aleksa Alimpic, FIDE Master
Meet Aleksa Alimpic, a chess virtuoso who holds the esteemed title of FIDE Master. Known in the chess circles as Alimpic, Aleksa is not just a player, but a relentless gladiator on 64 squares, who seems to treat every game like it’s the final scene in a thriller.
Since 2021, Aleksa’s Bullet rating has been a rollercoaster of excitement — hitting highs around 2581 and maintaining an impressive average near 2550 in recent times. With a total of over 270 bullet games across the years, Aleksa demonstrates stamina and speed, capturing wins and narrowly escaping losses with nearly perfect tactical wizardry. Their win rate hovers around 47% in bullet and 50% in blitz, but rapid games reveal a different beast — a fierce 68% win rate, proving that when given a bit more time, the magic really flourishes.
Aleksa’s style? A mix of patience and searing precision. They thrive almost equally playing as White or Black, with White boasting a modest 52.75% win rate and Black still dangerous at 45.54%. The average moves per win (~93 moves) tell us Aleksa loves a marathon — no quickies here! Endgames are Aleksa’s playground, appearing in close to 90% of the games, a place where many fear to tread but Aleksa waltzes with confidence.
Interestingly, Aleksa is a champion of comebacks with a whopping 94.68% comeback rate after losing material and a flawless 100% win rate following the loss of a piece — talk about resilience! Although the tilt factor is low, Aleksa’s rated games reveal a slight drop in performance compared to casual play, proving that even chess titans have their “off” moments.
Outside of numbers, Aleksa’s opponents are varied—from familiar rivals like rahul_201083 and sagitario1995 to fierce challengers such as norbi2323. Against many, Aleksa boasts a perfect score—sometimes making it look like their opponents were just there for sightseeing.
When does Aleksa shine? Early mornings prove fruitful, with 80% win rate at midnight and a notable 68% success around 5 PM, possibly indicating a predilection for either late-night inspiration or a strong afternoon coffee routine.
To sum up, Aleksa Alimpic is a chess force to be reckoned with — armed with patience, tactical genius, and a killer instinct for endgames, they keep giving spectators (and opponents) a front-row seat to thrilling battles on the chessboard!
Hi Aleksa, here’s an objective look at your recent games and a roadmap for climbing to the next level.
What you’re already doing well
- Opening variety & flexibility. In blitz you comfortably switch between the Slav, French, Dutch and Modern setups. Opponents rarely catch you out in the first 10 moves.
- Dynamic intuition. Your win vs. HansOnTwitch (2555 vs 3252) shows you recognise when to sacrifice structure for activity. The 29.f5 breakthrough followed by the rook lift was model textbook play.
- Converting initiative. In the Slav win against JaroslavSobek you kept the squeeze on with …Ne4, avoiding premature trades and forcing resignation in an equal-material position—excellent technique.
- Peak strength. Your current ceiling in blitz is 2557 (2025-01-28), proving you can already compete with 2600-level opposition on a good day.
Clear growth areas
-
King safety decisions under fire.
• French Exchange loss vs. Norbi2323: 11…gxh6 invited a direct attack that your pieces never neutralised.
• Modern-Larsen loss vs. Khanna-Aman: pawn thrust …h5-h4 opened files while your king remained on g8.
Training task: Whenever a capture opens your own g- or h-file, spend an extra 10 seconds on a blunder check (king exposure, loose back-rank, forcing checks).
Re-play the critical sequence: -
Time management in critical endings.
You flagged from a winning rook ending vs. JDPAchess and spent >35 seconds on three moves during the loss to Kobalia. Try the “30-20-10” rule: aim to have 30 sec by move 20, 20 sec by move 30, 10 sec by move 40 in 60 sec bullet; in 3 + 1 blitz keep >60 sec in reserve until move 25.
Training task: play three 1-minute games per session focusing on only premove/intuition—no calculation—then analyse the blunders offline. This conditions faster decision loops. -
Handling opposite-wing pawn races.
In the Dutch game you pushed a4-a5 and b3 without securing your second rank; …Rc3 and …Qxb3+ /Qb1+ became unstoppable.
Checklist before launching a flank pawn:
• Can opponent create a passed c- or b-pawn in ≤3 moves?
• Is my back rank loose?
• Do I control at least one of the two open files that will appear?
Study classic opposite-wing races (Karpov – Unzicker 1974) to sharpen your sense of urgency.
Micro-drills for the next 4 weeks
| Theme | Daily reps | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Defensive tactics | 20 puzzles filtered for “…? King exposure” | Score ≥80 % |
| Endgame technique | 5 rook-pawn endings from Nunn’s 100 Endgames | Convert in <60 sec each |
| Bullet sparring (1 | 0) | 10 games vs. 2300-2400 | Follow 30-20-10 rule |
| Opening file refresh | Review one line/night | Add two novelties to PGN |
Useful concepts to deepen
• zwischenzug timing in tactical exchanges• Minor-piece endgames with 4 vs 3 on one wing
• “Petrosian exchange” (trade attack-prone rook for minor piece to shut files)
Progress trackers
• Overall performance trend:• Hour-by-hour sharpness (to schedule training):
Next coaching call
In our next session we’ll:- Analyse the full Norbi2323 game move-by-move.
- Set up a defensive technique sparring drill starting from move 14.
- Choose one new low-theory opening to add (suggestion: Catalan Closed as White).
Keep the curiosity high and the king safer—small fixes will unlock another 50-rating-point jump!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rahul_201083 | 6W / 4L / 0D | |
| Artemio Núñez Martínez | 8W / 1L / 0D | |
| Oleg Terletsky | 4W / 3L / 1D | |
| Viktor Romanchuk | 5W / 1L / 2D | |
| ZURAB AZMAIPARASHVILI | 0W / 5L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2557 | 2553 | ||
| 2024 | 2562 | 2539 | ||
| 2023 | 2489 | 2487 | 2485 | |
| 2022 | 2408 | 2352 | 2380 | |
| 2021 | 2465 | 2480 | 2333 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3W / 3L / 2D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 77.9 |
| 2024 | 16W / 10L / 4D | 21W / 13L / 2D | 88.6 |
| 2023 | 38W / 21L / 9D | 34W / 24L / 5D | 94.0 |
| 2022 | 32W / 28L / 10D | 27W / 34L / 12D | 96.0 |
| 2021 | 76W / 50L / 10D | 54W / 57L / 16D | 96.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 48 | 26 | 15 | 7 | 54.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 68.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 21.4% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Döry Defense | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 45.5% |
| Modern Defense | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 8 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 12.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 27 | 12 | 12 | 3 | 44.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 21 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 47.6% |
| Australian Defense | 21 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 47.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 38.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Hedgehog System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Alatortsev-Lisitsyn Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 8 | 0 |
| Losing | 6 | 1 |