Sergey Averchenko - The FIDE Master with a Chess Clock!
Known online as Allion2017, Sergey Averchenko is a FIDE Master who proves that chess mastery doesn't have to be all serious business. With tactical awareness almost as sharp as his wit, Sergey navigates the 64 squares with a blend of finesse and fiery ambition.
Rating and Style
Sergey’s blitz rating peaked impressively at 2328 in March 2024, showing his quick thinking under pressure—because who doesn’t love a brain workout with a ticking clock? His bullet rating clocks in at an equally swift 2305, while his rapid play recently soared past the 2100 mark.
He’s known for a high comeback rate of 83.24%, so don’t be surprised if he turns around what looks like a lost match—Sergey’s playing style is like a chess ninja: subtle, strategic, and sometimes downright surprising. But beware — he only resigns early about 2.13% of the time, showing stubbornness and fighting spirit in nearly every game.
Playing Habits and Preferences
When it comes to openings, Sergey keeps his strategies shrouded in mystery with a substantial number of games labeled "Top Secret", but occasional flirtations with the Semi-Slav Defense and the famous Blackmar-Diemer Gambit hint at his adventurous side.
His psychological fortitude is notable with a modest tilt factor of 9 and a knack for performing best late at night, specifically around 11 PM — perfect timing for when the world quiets down and only the kings remain vigilant.
The Stats Behind the Moves
- Total blitz wins: 2,561 with a solid win rate against similarly rated opponents.
- Rapid battles: Balanced 181 wins and 181 losses, proving Sergey can go toe-to-toe over longer time controls.
- Bullet blitzkrieg: Nearly as many wins (939) as losses (986), showing he'll outpace you but might slip on the tiniest detail.
Notable Game Highlights
One of Sergey’s recent masterpieces was a sharp Semi-Slav Defense Anti-Meran Gambit victory in May 2025, where he outmaneuvered his opponent before a clean resignation. Such games demonstrate his ability to blend deep strategic plans with tactical flair.
Opponent Records (aka “Who’s afraid of Allion2017?”)
Sergey has battled a plethora of opponents, with some long-time chess rivals numbering over 20 clashes. His win rate against certain challengers hits a perfect 100%, reflecting his knack for cracking some defenses repeatedly, while others have managed to dodge his bullets!
In Summary
Sergey Averchenko is more than a player; he’s a chess enthusiast who loves the rush of a fast game and the meticulous grind of longer matches alike. FIDE Master by title and strategist by choice, Sergey’s chess journey is filled with sharp tactics, resilient comebacks, and a sprinkle of mystery. If you play him, be prepared: he’s got the brain, the speed, and the patience to make every move count — and maybe a joke up his sleeve too.
Feedback for Sergey Averchenko — blitz play
You play with a willingness to fight for initiative and to complicate positions, which is a strong fit for blitz. Your games show you can generate active, often sharp positions where opponents feel the pressure. At the same time, blitz can tempt overextension or tactical overreach, so focusing on consistency and clean conversion will help turn more of those stories into wins.
What went well
- You frequently seek dynamic piece activity and aim to keep your opponent on the defensive, creating practical problems that are hard to solve under time pressure.
- Your willingness to choose flexible, solid openings helps you avoid early strategic collapses and keeps pressure on the opponent early in the game.
- You show good willingness to simplify into favorable endgames when your initiative dries up, which is a solid skill in blitz where exact calculation can be limited by time.
Key areas to improve
- Time management: aim to secure at least a comfortable portion of the clock in the early to middlegame, so you’re not rushing decisions in critical moments.
- Threat-aware calculation: in sharp lines, pause a moment to verify your candidate forcing moves and look for quiet replies your opponent could have; avoid letting a strong defensive move slip through due to haste.
- Consistency in transition: work on turning initiative into tangible advantages (material or positional) rather than chasing multiple tactical ideas at once, which can lead to miscalculation.
- Endgame technique under time pressure: practice straightforward pawn endings and rook endings to convert small advantages into wins even when the clock is tight.
Opening choices to consider
Your performance indicates solid results with certain flexible structures. To build consistency, you might reinforce a compact repertoire around these lines. Consider exploring: Alapin-Sicilian-Defense and Australian-Defense to reach comfortable middlegame positions where you can press while keeping the king relatively safe. You can review typical middlegame plans from these lines and practice the common tactical motifs that arise.
Practical training plan
- Daily drills: 15-20 minutes of tactical puzzles focusing on common blitz motifs (forks, pins, skewers, back-rank ideas) to improve quick pattern recognition.
- Game analysis: review 2-3 recent blitz games (yours and a few opponent games) to identify a recurring moment where quick decision-making led to a risk or missed conversion.
- Opening reinforcement: spend 2 sessions per week expanding the Alapin-Sicilian and Australian-Defense lines, noting typical middlegame structures and safe plan ideas.
- Endgame practice: 1 short endgame drill per week (rook endings, king and pawn endings) to sharpen conversion under time pressure.
Notes on your openings performance
Your data suggests focusing on openings that keep tension but avoid early tactical chaos can suit blitz well. Emphasize solid, repeatable plans within those lines, and back them up with quick, high-quality calculation when opponents push. If you’d like, I can annotate a couple of recent games to illustrate concrete moments to improve within these openings. [[Link|analysis|Recent Games]]
Next steps
If you want, I can tailor a短, actionable 2-week plan and annotate specific positions from your latest games to show exact improvements you can work on. For a quick start, try implementing a stricter time plan in the first 10 moves and practicing the recommended endgame drills after your blitz sessions.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| vikingviking1984 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| marcostt | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| marius2322 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| deleddy | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| leo_bma | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ashvets | 3W / 1L / 3D | View |
| yow_megs | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| subwooferbishop | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sakkozo12 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nur301116 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| al_fakri | 20W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| pozal10 | 5W / 13L / 0D | View Games |
| Rexhep Masha | 5W / 11L / 0D | View Games |
| Ahmed Elshafei | 6W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
| jackweile | 3W / 8L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2228 | 2265 | 2213 | 2003 |
| 2024 | 2305 | 2262 | 1555 | |
| 2023 | 1948 | 2008 | 2003 | |
| 2022 | 1909 | 1909 | 1385 | |
| 2021 | 1686 | 1895 | ||
| 2020 | 1276 | 1957 | 1228 | |
| 2019 | 2045 | 1310 | ||
| 2018 | 1761 | 2037 | 1194 | |
| 2017 | 1947 | 1881 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 151W / 86L / 15D | 119W / 113L / 16D | 70.3 |
| 2024 | 144W / 60L / 9D | 121W / 84L / 10D | 72.2 |
| 2023 | 463W / 421L / 29D | 425W / 432L / 38D | 67.5 |
| 2022 | 192W / 123L / 12D | 188W / 134L / 9D | 66.8 |
| 2021 | 13W / 9L / 0D | 8W / 12L / 0D | 61.0 |
| 2020 | 187W / 129L / 17D | 161W / 151L / 18D | 68.3 |
| 2019 | 392W / 300L / 46D | 359W / 356L / 27D | 68.9 |
| 2018 | 275W / 210L / 28D | 237W / 256L / 32D | 67.0 |
| 2017 | 209W / 153L / 12D | 175W / 180L / 17D | 69.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 540 | 320 | 202 | 18 | 59.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 269 | 155 | 106 | 8 | 57.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 186 | 94 | 82 | 10 | 50.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 145 | 82 | 54 | 9 | 56.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 133 | 76 | 50 | 7 | 57.1% |
| Australian Defense | 121 | 82 | 36 | 3 | 67.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 108 | 55 | 45 | 8 | 50.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 105 | 53 | 41 | 11 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 98 | 50 | 40 | 8 | 51.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line | 95 | 45 | 45 | 5 | 47.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 49 | 27 | 21 | 1 | 55.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 23 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 65.2% |
| Philidor Defense | 22 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 18 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 22.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 46.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Scotch Game | 11 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 36.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Slav Defense | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 30.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 270 | 134 | 127 | 9 | 49.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 102 | 45 | 55 | 2 | 44.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 68 | 37 | 31 | 0 | 54.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 67 | 31 | 35 | 1 | 46.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 67 | 29 | 37 | 1 | 43.3% |
| Australian Defense | 64 | 36 | 28 | 0 | 56.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 62 | 37 | 23 | 2 | 59.7% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 43 | 19 | 21 | 3 | 44.2% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 40 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 39 | 16 | 20 | 3 | 41.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 26 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 4 |