Ivan Di Liberti is a rising online chess presence whose Blitz play combines rapid calculation with a calm, often humorous approach to time pressure. He moved from casual games to competitive online blitz with a natural flair for surprising opponents and turning clock chaos into creative ideas. Known for his practical openings and fearless middle-game improvisation, Ivan has become a recognizable figure in fast time controls. ivan_di_liberti
His Blitz peak rating reached 2138 in May 2019, a milestone that still surfaces in conversations about his early breakthroughs. 2138 (2019-05-02)
Playing Style
Preferring Blitz as his main arena, Ivan thrives on fast calculation, tactical skirmishes, and keeping opponents under constant pressure. He blends solid theoretical grounding with willingness to explore sharp, uncharted ideas when the clock runs down, turning time trouble into an opportunity to outpace and outthink his rivals.
Across other fast-time formats, his repertoire shows a willingness to test bold lines and dynamic ideas against a wide range of opponents. Scandinavian Defense
Notable Achievements
Longest Winning Streak: 13 games
Blitz peak rating: 2138 (2019-05-02)
Bullet peak rating: 2156 (2020-07-21)
Known for turning time pressure into creative attacking chances
Coach Chesswick
Blitz feedback for Ivan Di Liberti
You’ve shown clear fighting spirit in blitz and a willingness to engage with sharp, tactical lines. Your recent activity indicates you can generate practical winning chances when you get in command of the position, and you don’t shy away from complex middlegames. At the same time, there are some patterns in your recent results that suggest targeted improvements can yield bigger gains in time-controlled games.
What you do well
Triggering dynamic play when you sense a tactical moment. You are comfortable initiating aggressive sequences and putting pressure on the opponent’s king, which is a strong asset in blitz where seconds matter.
Staying willing to calculate forcing lines. In winning lines, you demonstrated the ability to spot and execute concrete forcing ideas that convert small advantages into a decisive result.
Keeping activity and piece coordination high. Even when the position is imbalanced, you instinctively look for piece activity and king-side or central activity that creates practical problems for opponents under time pressure.
Areas to improve
Time management and pace. Your rating history shows significant short-term fluctuations and some negative slope zones in the near term. Build a simple time-check routine: aim to spend a predictable amount of time on the first dozen moves, and leave a clear plan for the later middle game.
Decision hygiene in the opening. In blitz, you benefit from reaching a solid, playable middlegame quickly. Consider locking in 1-2 openings you know well for both sides so you can make fast, confident decisions and reduce overthinking early on.
Tactical robustness and pattern recognition. Some lines lead to material swings or sudden tactical collapses. Regular pattern-recognition work (front-mier tactics, common forks, back-rank motifs, and overloads) will help you spot threats sooner and avoid overcommitment.
Endgame conversion. When the game opens up or simplifies, you sometimes drift into unclear endgames. Strengthen basic endgame technique (opposition, pawn endgames, and rook endings) so you can convert advantages more reliably in short time limits.
Opening performance snapshot
Your openings show solid competitiveness with room to optimize. Notable points from the data include:
French Defense and Sicilian Defense lines show around 50% win rates, suggesting both are workable but could benefit from deeper line study to push toward 55-60% in blitz.
Other lines such as the Scandinavian Defense and Bird Openings hover in the mid-40s to low-50s, indicating you perform okay but could gain with targeted study of typical middlegame plans arising from those structures.
Overall, a balanced portfolio is good, but picking 2-3 openings you feel most comfortable with and sharpening their main ideas will reduce early decision time and improve consistency.
Actionable training plan (next 4 weeks)
Time management drill: In every blitz session, split the game into three phases (opening, middlegame, endgame). For the opening, set a target to spend no more than the first 8-10 moves with time to spare. After that, focus on applying a simple plan and evaluating forced moves quickly.
Opening consolidation: Choose 2 White openings and 2 Black responses you like. Learn 3 key middlegame ideas for each (typical pawn structures, typical piece maneuvers, and common tactical motifs). Practice these lines against a training engine or with a friend until you can reach them in under 5 maneu minutes of thought in blitz.
Tactics daily: Do 15-20 minutes of fast tactical puzzles (2-3 minutes per puzzle). Focus on spotting common blitz-skewing motifs (forks, pins, skewers, back-rank ideas) to improve quick calculation under pressure.
Endgame practice: Pick 2 simple endgames (rook ending with pawns, king and rook vs king) and drill practical conversion patterns. This will help you finish more games with clear plans instead of guessing in the clock.
Post-game review: After each blitz session, spend a few minutes reviewing 1-2 critical positions. Identify where you spent too long, where you missed a forcing idea, and how the plan could have been tightened. Write a quick note for future reference.
Optional quick references
If you want to anchor this feedback to concrete positions, we can attach a brief move-by-move summary from one of your recent games to highlight decisions and plans. I can also add a small opening-idea summary for your chosen lines to the next report.
