Andrew Lerner (andy07670) - National Master Extraordinaire
Meet Andrew Lerner, a chess aficionado with the prestigious title of National Master, bestowed by National—because being great on the national level just wasn’t enough! Known online as andy07670, Andrew has been navigating the 64 squares with the finesse of a grandmaster in the making and a dash of flair that makes each game a story worth telling.
Rating Rollercoaster & Blitz Brilliance
Andrew’s blitz rating journey is nothing short of a thrilling chess saga. Starting around 1945 in late 2016 and climbing peaks as high as 2480 in July 2024, he dances on the edge of grandmaster territory with jaw-dropping blazing speed. His rapid play, while less frequent, hit an impressive peak rating of 2200 back in 2020.
Playing Style & Chess Personality
A true strategist, Andrew prefers long, sharp battles, averaging roughly 68 moves per win. The endgames are his playground, appearing in nearly 79% of his games — which means if you get past the opening, prepare for a fight. Early resignation rate is delightfully low, proving he's not one to throw in the towel at the first sign of trouble. His comeback rate is a heroic 84%, so expect some nail-biting reversals when facing him.
Fun fact: Andrew performs best early in the morning around 7 AM, proving he’s either a morning person or just a morning ninja on the board. Beware, though – his tilt factor hits a modest 11, so keep your cool if you want to break his winning stride.
Records & Rivals
With over 2879 wins in blitz alone, and a respectful resume of opponents such as "mifortress" and "hawkeye-86," Andrew’s competitive spirit is fierce. His longest winning streak stands at an impressive 21 games, and he currently rides an 11-game winning streak, proving he’s in excellent form. And yes, he’s suffered 11-game losing streaks too, but hey, even champions have off days!
Recent Triumph
Andrew’s most recent victory was a dazzling display in a Chess960 game, clinching the win by checkmate with a savvy endgame maneuver. If you want to see a demonstration of patience, tactical awareness, and creative attack fused together, check out his final move: Rg8#. That’s chess artistry with a wink.
The Bottom Line
Andrew Lerner is not your average weekend warrior. He is a National Master with a tenacious fighting spirit, a tactical mastermind who thrives in complex endgames, and a blitz shark ready to outpace you in rapid-fire duels. Whether you're facing him online or analyzing his games for inspiration, Andy07670 reminds us all that chess is not just a game — it’s a battle of wit, endurance, and a pinch of morning magic.
Hi Andrew!
Congrats on your recent run of wins (including the spirited attack against hawkeye-86) and for pushing your blitz-960 rating close to 2480 (2024-07-09). The notes below highlight what is already working and what can be sharpened to break through the next rating band.
What you’re doing well
- Initiative-first mindset. Many of your victories start with energetic pawn breaks (…g6 / f-pawns in your Black games; g- and f-pawns as White) that open lines for active pieces. In the win below you combined pawn storms with a rook lift and created mating nets in time trouble:
- Tactical awareness. Exchanges such as 14.Rxf5! in the game against cvrckvrc show a good eye for loose pieces and intermediate moves. You are rarely afraid to sacrifice material when the resulting activity is obvious.
- Nerve in time scrambles. Even with only seconds on the clock you keep finding forcing moves, often converting completely winning positions that many players would flag in.
Key growth areas
- Opening structure & king safety.
• In several losses (e.g. vs Maptip) early pawn thrusts left holes that were exploited later. Try anchoring your plans around classic centre formations first, then unleash pawn storms.
• Playing a few standard starting positions will help you recognise typical plans more quickly in 960. Pick one e-pawn and one d-pawn structure to study in depth. - Move-order details.
Your tactics are sharp, but occasionally a missing Zwischenzug or overlooked counter checks cost material (see 22…Nd3+ in the loss vs MarioKapsarov). Habit: after selecting a move, spend two seconds asking “what is my opponent’s most annoying reply?” before you play it. - Time management.
Two recent defeats were on the clock in roughly equal positions. Aim to reach move 15 with ≥1:45 left. Practical tips:- Use your opponent’s think time to calculate your next two moves.
- When the position is stable, invest 3-5 seconds to build a plan so you can blitz out several moves later.
- Positional conversion.
When the sharp phase is over, slow down and switch to Prophylaxis: improve worst piece, restrict counter-play, only then chase pawns. In the Couillaccus game you grabbed material but allowed counter play on the queenside that became decisive.
Action plan for the next month
- Each session, annotate one win and one loss with a computer afterwards. Focus on the first 12 moves and every missed tactic of >1 pawn.
- Play 3-4 rapid games (10|0 or 15|10) weekly to practise deeper calculation without the clock pressure that masks strategic blind spots.
- Puzzle streak: 15-minute daily tactical workout. Prioritise themes you’ve missed recently (overloaded pieces, mating nets, deflections).
- Create a mini 960 repertoire notebook: for every starting position you face, jot down
- Castling options & safest king.
- First central pawn you want to move.
- Ideal minor-piece development squares.
- Review a handful of classical games featuring opposite-side pawn storms (Fischer–Benko 1963, Shirov attacking classics) to absorb timing of pawn pushes and piece sacrifices.
Progress tracker
Use these to spot when you play your best chess:
Final thought
Your attacking instincts are a real asset. Blend them with a little more opening discipline and clock control and you’ll be poised to cross the 1900 barrier soon. Enjoy the journey and keep the games coming!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| dlevine32180 | 12W / 9L / 1D | View Games |
| mifortress | 16W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
| Cristobalsosasi | 4W / 10L / 2D | View Games |
| hawkeye-86 | 7W / 6L / 2D | View Games |
| Ariel Crawford | 4W / 9L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2035 | 1786 | ||
| 2024 | 1784 | |||
| 2022 | 2302 | |||
| 2021 | 2304 | 2105 | ||
| 2020 | 2275 | 2200 | ||
| 2018 | 2252 | |||
| 2017 | 2202 | |||
| 2016 | 2005 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 571W / 282L / 36D | 518W / 317L / 50D | 67.1 |
| 2024 | 181W / 77L / 11D | 188W / 70L / 12D | 68.9 |
| 2022 | 144W / 106L / 21D | 121W / 123L / 26D | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 233W / 169L / 32D | 199W / 201L / 33D | 75.3 |
| 2020 | 265W / 212L / 22D | 242W / 219L / 42D | 75.2 |
| 2018 | 60W / 35L / 6D | 51W / 44L / 6D | 72.9 |
| 2017 | 164W / 125L / 19D | 159W / 132L / 21D | 75.4 |
| 2016 | 147W / 119L / 17D | 134W / 131L / 16D | 72.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 526 | 378 | 128 | 20 | 71.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 313 | 153 | 142 | 18 | 48.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 210 | 116 | 79 | 15 | 55.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 191 | 128 | 54 | 9 | 67.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 179 | 114 | 55 | 10 | 63.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 150 | 78 | 64 | 8 | 52.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 130 | 84 | 38 | 8 | 64.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 127 | 77 | 43 | 7 | 60.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 110 | 56 | 46 | 8 | 50.9% |
| Bird Opening | 110 | 64 | 39 | 7 | 58.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Paulsen Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 39 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 48.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 29 | 14 | 12 | 3 | 48.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 28 | 16 | 11 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 27 | 11 | 13 | 3 | 40.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 22 | 5 | 14 | 3 | 22.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 22 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 59.1% |
| Modern | 21 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 20 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 55.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 19 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 47.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 18 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 61.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |