Anthony Maulucci (animaul7) - The Chess Adventurer
Meet Anthony Maulucci, aka animaul7, a chess player whose rating journey looks like a rollercoaster designed by a grandmaster with a wicked sense of humor. Starting modestly in the early 2010s with blitz ratings barely flirting with 1200, Anthony has spectacularly worked his way up to the dizzying heights of 2400+ in blitz—no small feat unless you consider the outrageous amount of games he's played. Just a casual 31,000+ blitz battles, no big deal.
Anthony's love for bullet and rapid formats is equally passionate, boasting peak ratings near 2100 in bullet and an impressive 2300+ in rapid — definitely not your average weekend warrior. The daily chess arena seems to be his playground for long, strategic marathons, often dragging out games well beyond 60 moves—because why quit early when you can ponder for hours?
Famous for a comeback rate exceeding 80%, and an astounding nearly 98% win rate after losing a piece, Anthony isn’t one to throw in the towel when things go south. His tilt factor is modest at 13, which means he can lose a few games without wanting to throw his computer out the window. Practicing avoidance of early resignations (a humble 2.3% early quit rate), he’s more of a “let’s fight until the last pawn” kind of competitor.
Despite being a grinder with thousands of wins and losses in blitz alone, Anthony has managed to maintain a quirky consistency: his win rate hovers around 48 to 50% in most formats, proving that chess isn’t just about winning, but embracing the beautifully chaotic dance of the 64 squares.
Anthony is no stranger to streaks either. His longest victorious run spans 14 games—kind of like a chess montage in a movie, except with less dramatic music and more finger cramps. When it comes to opponents, he's faced “naoveure” the most times, with a respectable 43.6% win rate. He also shows 100% determination (and win percentage) against some rivals with fewer encounters — a true opportunist!
When not busy blitzing moves at warp speed, Anthony enjoys playing around 9 AM, and curiously hits his peak win percentages early in the morning, hinting at a secret caffeine-fueled strategy or morning-move magic.
In short, Anthony Maulucci is a chess enthusiast who embodies relentless passion, strategic chaos, and the courage to battle on no matter the odds. Whether he's crafting brilliant checkmates or staging epic comebacks, he's always entertaining the chess world, one game at a time.
Overview of your recent rapid games
You’ve shown a strong ability to seize initiative and keep pressure on the board, which is a big asset in rapid time controls. When you initiate activity, you often force your opponent to react, and you convert that into concrete chances. At times, though, the eagerness to maintain momentum leads to overextension or risky exchanges that can swing the position against you. The key going forward is to blend your aggressive stance with tighter counting of exchanges and clearer plans in the middlegame and endgame.
What you are doing well
- Consistent willingness to generate activity and create threats rather than passively waiting for chances.
- Strong results in openings that lead to dynamic positions, which suits your tactical style.
- Good ability to convert pressure into a win when you maintain initiative and keep lines open for attack.
Key areas to improve
- Endgame technique: improve how you convert advantages after the middlegame, especially in rook and pawn endings or when material is simplifying.
- Calculation discipline in sharp or tactical scenes: avoid overloading plans and keep a clear short-term objective in complex middlegames.
- Time management in rapid: allocate time to critical middlegame decisions and prevent last-minute pressure from eroding precision.
- Opening consolidation: ensure you have a clear plan after the first few moves so you don’t get stuck in unclear middlegame positions.
Opening repertoire and practical ideas
You show good results with several aggressive and dynamic lines. Consider formalizing a 1-2 key lines for both sides that align with your strengths to reduce decision fatigue in fast games. For example, you already perform well in certain King's Indian–type structures and related aggressive setups, so deepening knowledge of those plans will pay off. Focus on understanding typical middlegame ideas and endgame transitions that come from those families, so you can stay in favorable types of positions more reliably.
Training plan for the coming weeks
- Daily tactics practice focused on common rapid-match motifs: back rank problems, deflections, overloads, and short tactical sequences to depth of 3–4 moves.
- Endgame drills twice weekly, starting with rook endings and pawn endgames, to improve technique in converting chances from simplified positions.
- Opening refinement: pick 1–2 lines you enjoy from the dynamic openings you’ve used, and study typical middlegame plans and common pitfalls. Review 1-2 model games per line and extract the key strategic ideas.
- Game post-mortems: after each game, write a brief note identifying three critical moments, what you did well, and what you would do differently next time.
- Time management practice: in 15–20 minute practice sessions, set a planned pace (e.g., aim to reach a comfortable decision point by move 15 in most games) and use a timer to simulate time pressure.
Practical drills you can start today
- Play quick 15+10 games focusing on one of your preferred openers; stop and analyze at move 15 to enforce a solid plan.
- Work on a 20-minute endgame ladder: rotate rook endings, then rook + pawn endings, to build reliable conversion.
- Study one model game in your favored opening family per week and summarize the strategic idea in plain language.
Encouragement
Your trajectory shows a positive trend, and your willingness to engage in sharp, fighting games will serve you well with continued focus on balance between aggression and structural soundness. Keep the momentum, and tailor your practice to reinforce the recurring patterns where you excel while tightening the areas that cost you in the middlegame and endgame.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| c9_trap | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| tommy2555 | 3W / 3L / 0D | |
| atwqc | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| lichessbirdy | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| paintsip | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| zilbermanov | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| angelilit | 2W / 0L / 1D | |
| sherbertcat9 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| aditeyadps33 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| sebastinastrya | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| naoveure | 17W / 20L / 2D | |
| bugserge | 16W / 20L / 1D | |
| aloysius Moore | 15W / 19L / 1D | |
| DanielTorpedo | 15W / 16L / 4D | |
| antiego | 18W / 12L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2423 | |||
| 2024 | 2089 | 2286 | 2315 | |
| 2023 | 2098 | 2141 | 2310 | 1960 |
| 2022 | 1988 | 2190 | 2116 | 1870 |
| 2021 | 2002 | 2181 | 2196 | 2050 |
| 2020 | 1884 | 1603 | 2013 | |
| 2019 | 1481 | 1978 | 1982 | |
| 2018 | 1759 | 1416 | 1989 | |
| 2017 | 1735 | 2049 | 1943 | 1960 |
| 2016 | 1707 | 1887 | 1961 | 1950 |
| 2015 | 1529 | 1835 | 1911 | 1958 |
| 2014 | 1384 | 1766 | 1977 | 1417 |
| 2013 | 1602 | 1346 | ||
| 2012 | 1060 | 1197 | 1586 | |
| 2011 | 1212 | 1441 | 1200 | |
| 2010 | 1238 | 1490 | ||
| 2009 | 1278 | 1470 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1631W / 1348L / 169D | 1449W / 1537L / 164D | 78.0 |
| 2024 | 2492W / 2195L / 271D | 2333W / 2315L / 301D | 78.3 |
| 2023 | 2134W / 1858L / 209D | 1887W / 2067L / 231D | 75.6 |
| 2022 | 1755W / 1518L / 170D | 1524W / 1695L / 201D | 76.1 |
| 2021 | 2366W / 2171L / 272D | 2212W / 2327L / 278D | 75.0 |
| 2020 | 540W / 490L / 48D | 502W / 500L / 65D | 67.9 |
| 2019 | 88W / 98L / 4D | 71W / 94L / 5D | 47.0 |
| 2018 | 171W / 170L / 12D | 182W / 153L / 17D | 54.9 |
| 2017 | 776W / 705L / 62D | 750W / 709L / 71D | 58.8 |
| 2016 | 240W / 159L / 42D | 244W / 162L / 47D | 68.9 |
| 2015 | 271W / 203L / 51D | 270W / 206L / 47D | 69.4 |
| 2014 | 319W / 310L / 67D | 330W / 302L / 64D | 71.9 |
| 2013 | 58W / 73L / 18D | 58W / 73L / 20D | 70.8 |
| 2012 | 189W / 202L / 38D | 178W / 197L / 36D | 66.3 |
| 2011 | 47W / 44L / 0D | 42W / 47L / 7D | 65.9 |
| 2010 | 64W / 86L / 3D | 63W / 84L / 7D | 66.1 |
| 2009 | 31W / 24L / 0D | 53W / 57L / 3D | 61.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 227 | 101 | 108 | 18 | 44.5% |
| Slav Defense | 135 | 62 | 56 | 17 | 45.9% |
| French Defense | 133 | 60 | 62 | 11 | 45.1% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 106 | 55 | 45 | 6 | 51.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 83 | 43 | 32 | 8 | 51.8% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 78 | 31 | 36 | 11 | 39.7% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 78 | 43 | 31 | 4 | 55.1% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 77 | 40 | 34 | 3 | 52.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 75 | 31 | 38 | 6 | 41.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 70 | 39 | 24 | 7 | 55.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 2248 | 1034 | 1076 | 138 | 46.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 2032 | 968 | 929 | 135 | 47.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1756 | 813 | 830 | 113 | 46.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 1747 | 842 | 813 | 92 | 48.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1626 | 849 | 689 | 88 | 52.2% |
| Slav Defense | 1262 | 650 | 541 | 71 | 51.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1252 | 590 | 610 | 52 | 47.1% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 1246 | 602 | 569 | 75 | 48.3% |
| Australian Defense | 1090 | 523 | 514 | 53 | 48.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 1053 | 458 | 512 | 83 | 43.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 42 | 27 | 13 | 2 | 64.3% |
| Slav Defense | 29 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 72.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 28 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 53.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 26 | 19 | 4 | 3 | 73.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 24 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 70.8% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 23 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 78.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 22 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 72.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 20 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 65.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 818 | 388 | 402 | 28 | 47.4% |
| Australian Defense | 722 | 360 | 335 | 27 | 49.9% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 679 | 332 | 319 | 28 | 48.9% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 424 | 194 | 208 | 22 | 45.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 388 | 185 | 190 | 13 | 47.7% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 376 | 195 | 159 | 22 | 51.9% |
| Slav Defense | 350 | 167 | 164 | 19 | 47.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 347 | 171 | 162 | 14 | 49.3% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 318 | 159 | 147 | 12 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 305 | 167 | 134 | 4 | 54.8% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 2 |