Anika Du Plessis, Woman International Master
Meet Anika Du Plessis, a chess player whose journey through the 64 squares is as exciting as her title of Woman International Master granted by FIDE. A resilient and tactical warrior, Anika has battled through countless games, proving her mettle in bullet, blitz, rapid, and daily formats.
Starting with a bullet rating around the 640 mark back in 2012, Anika’s rapid improvement is nothing short of impressive, rocketing to a peak bullet rating of 1705 in the near future year 2025 (or so her data suggests!). She’s demonstrated remarkable endurance, playing hundreds of games each year and maintaining nearly a 50% win rate in fast-paced formats where seconds matter and brains matter more.
But don’t mistake her for a speed demon only: her strategic depth shines brightest in daily and rapid chess, where she maintains a strong hold with average win rates above 60% in her favorite "Top Secret" opening (which we’ll never reveal, of course!). Also, she loves long endgames, sticking around for nearly 60 moves per victory, proving patience is her secret weapon.
With a comeback rate of nearly 76% and an almost Jedi-like 98% win rate after losing a piece, Anika embodies the phrase "never say die." She’s had epic winning streaks—up to 51 games—and now, despite taking the occasional loss, her competitive spirit never dips below par (or her tilt factor of 24, which is surprisingly modest for such a fierce competitor).
Anika’s playstyle favors steady progress and psychological warfare. She resigns early only about 4% of the time, preferring to battle hard through endgames, where 70% of her games see complex maneuvering. Whether wielding the white or black pieces, Anika holds an edge, slightly better when playing white, winning over 52% of those encounters.
Her most challenging opponents include the likes of “lynx1999,” against whom games have been tightly contested (winning about 48%), and “danfrank99,” presenting fierce rivalry with a nearly even score. But against others like “keuchr” and “mhishi_d,” she's a perfect 100%.
Off the board, Anika might just be plotting her next secret opening or working on her blitz reflexes, where she’s flirted with ratings close to 1900. On the board, she’s a force to be reckoned with—mixing fun, ingenuity, and the occasional surprise checkmate.
In short, Anika Du Plessis is not just a chess player; she's a chess artist and strategist who mixes speed, skill, and a sprinkle of mystery. Whether you're a fellow player or fan, her games are worth watching – after all, who can resist the charm of a Woman International Master with a dash of secret sauce?
Feedback for Anika Du Plessis
Hi Anika, you've been showing great enthusiasm and solid understanding in your recent games. Here are some constructive points to help you improve further:
Strengths
- Opening Preparation: You’ve demonstrated a good grasp of popular openings like the Reti, Scandinavian, and various Queen’s Pawn systems. Your early development and castling are consistent and timely.
- Attacking Play: In many wins, you effectively utilized tactical opportunities and coordinated your pieces well to deliver checkmate. Moves like timely queen and bishop activity have served you well.
- Endgame Technique: You convert advantages calmly and accurately, as seen in your clean checkmate finishes and precise queen sacrifices.
Areas to Improve
- Handling Complexity in the Middle Game: In your losses, there were moments where your position became cramped or your piece coordination faltered. Focus on piece activity and controlling key squares to maintain an advantageous middle game.
- Watch for Tactical Shots Against You: Some losses resulted from unexpected tactical sequences by your opponents, such as pins and discovered attacks. Double-check your opponent's threats before committing to exchanges or pawn pushes.
- Time Management: A few games ended on time or ended in rapid time pressure. Try to pace your thinking to avoid rushing critical moments, especially around key tactical decisions.
Suggestions for Training
- Practice tactical puzzles regularly focusing on pins, forks, and discovered attacks to sharpen your alertness to opponent threats.
- Review your games that ended prematurely or in complications and identify moments where an alternative move could have kept advantage or avoided danger.
- Work on positional understanding by studying classical games featuring the openings you prefer, emphasizing plans and pawn structures.
Keep up the hard work, Anika! Analyzing both your wins and losses, as you've done, is key to steady improvement. Stay confident and continue building on your excellent attacking instincts.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| cikacane | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| lars2chess | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| brotherly_heart | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| burakdc1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ryanlab | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| areyouarobot | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| lovelaughlive | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Christiaan van Staden | 21W / 20L / 3D | |
| Patzer Potgieter | 32W / 10L / 2D | |
| R W | 8W / 13L / 9D | |
| Nico Grobler | 19W / 4L / 1D | |
| danfrank99 | 9W / 6L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1591 | 1451 | ||
| 2024 | 1615 | 1831 | 1620 | |
| 2023 | 1861 | 1827 | 1612 | |
| 2022 | 1869 | 1591 | 1620 | |
| 2021 | 1698 | 1591 | 1668 | |
| 2020 | 1397 | 1698 | 1549 | 1754 |
| 2019 | 1255 | 1721 | 1671 | 1772 |
| 2018 | 1196 | 1610 | 1624 | 1772 |
| 2017 | 1061 | 1501 | 1604 | 1754 |
| 2016 | 1122 | 1507 | 1539 | 1685 |
| 2015 | 1031 | 1373 | 1553 | 1725 |
| 2014 | 996 | 1170 | 1542 | 1506 |
| 2013 | 1005 | 1283 | 1592 | |
| 2012 | 640 | 1076 | 1174 | 1617 |
| 2011 | 1281 | 2011 | ||
| 2010 | 1109 | 1783 | ||
| 2009 | 1114 | 2129 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 257W / 260L / 7D | 290W / 250L / 10D | 53.7 |
| 2024 | 7W / 4L / 0D | 4W / 5L / 0D | 66.0 |
| 2023 | 13W / 11L / 1D | 12W / 10L / 0D | 63.9 |
| 2022 | 27W / 19L / 9D | 25W / 23L / 6D | 80.0 |
| 2021 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 61.0 |
| 2020 | 41W / 32L / 7D | 29W / 38L / 12D | 70.2 |
| 2019 | 102W / 75L / 12D | 97W / 88L / 11D | 68.8 |
| 2018 | 325W / 286L / 19D | 322W / 286L / 17D | 67.9 |
| 2017 | 120W / 85L / 13D | 92W / 113L / 17D | 67.2 |
| 2016 | 150W / 114L / 10D | 138W / 127L / 15D | 70.3 |
| 2015 | 103W / 84L / 8D | 96W / 93L / 3D | 71.7 |
| 2014 | 159W / 156L / 13D | 154W / 157L / 18D | 70.1 |
| 2013 | 18W / 15L / 1D | 13W / 14L / 0D | 76.4 |
| 2012 | 31W / 50L / 0D | 23W / 57L / 6D | 49.6 |
| 2011 | 36W / 3L / 0D | 35W / 4L / 3D | 46.4 |
| 2010 | 24W / 16L / 2D | 37W / 18L / 3D | 44.3 |
| 2009 | 91W / 42L / 3D | 129W / 37L / 6D | 51.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 226 | 132 | 90 | 4 | 58.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 201 | 96 | 96 | 9 | 47.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 141 | 79 | 56 | 6 | 56.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 122 | 65 | 51 | 6 | 53.3% |
| Scotch Game | 84 | 52 | 27 | 5 | 61.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 60 | 28 | 30 | 2 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 51 | 19 | 30 | 2 | 37.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 50 | 18 | 31 | 1 | 36.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 47 | 21 | 24 | 2 | 44.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 46 | 26 | 16 | 4 | 56.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 303 | 167 | 130 | 6 | 55.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 105 | 45 | 57 | 3 | 42.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 96 | 46 | 49 | 1 | 47.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 90 | 50 | 40 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 79 | 39 | 40 | 0 | 49.4% |
| Scotch Game | 76 | 35 | 41 | 0 | 46.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 74 | 45 | 29 | 0 | 60.8% |
| French Defense | 56 | 28 | 27 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 49 | 23 | 24 | 2 | 46.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 48 | 27 | 20 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 57 | 44 | 12 | 1 | 77.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 48 | 35 | 13 | 0 | 72.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 37 | 18 | 14 | 5 | 48.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 25 | 14 | 11 | 0 | 56.0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 61.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 19 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 73.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 18 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 72.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 17 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 64.7% |
| French Defense | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 93.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 67 | 30 | 31 | 6 | 44.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 54 | 29 | 22 | 3 | 53.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 42 | 26 | 13 | 3 | 61.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 36 | 16 | 19 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 28 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 22 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 18 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 18 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 61.1% |
| Elephant Gambit | 16 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 15 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 46.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 51 | 0 |
| Losing | 24 | 3 |