Profile
Ansumana Kamara (username: anskam) is a competitive chess player and FIDE-titled Candidate Master. Known for a fondness for fighting positions and long rapid games, Ansumana has carved out a reputation as a gritty Rapid specialist who relishes tactical melees and practical chances. Keywords: Ansumana Kamara, Candidate Master, Rapid chess, Sicilian Najdorf, chess biography.
- Full name: Ansumana Kamara (anskam)
- Title: Candidate Master (FIDE)
- Preferred time control: Rapid (Rapid)
- Peak Rapid rating:
- Peak Blitz rating:
Career & style
Ansumana’s chess reads like an adventurous novel: early years of steady growth, a breakthrough stretch of consistent 2000+ Rapid play, and plenty of marathon games that end in long endgames. Comfortable in both tactical skirmishes and slow technical maneuvers, Ansumana mixes attacking creativity with stubborn endgame technique—an often effective combination in online Rapid events.
- Playing personality: Attacker with endgame grit (high endgame frequency and long average decisive game length).
- Psychology: Strong comeback rate and solid results after material losses—likes to swindle when opponents get overconfident.
- Game tempo: Prefers deep, decisive encounters (avg decisive length often >70 moves).
Visualize the career arc:
Openings & notable repertoire
Ansumana plays a wide array of openings but shows clear preferences that shape his strengths. Sicilian lines and dynamic defenses dominate his Rapid practice, with especially heavy usage of the Najdorf and related Sicilian families.
- Most-played (Rapid): Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation — nearly 1,000 games, solid win rate in long play.
- Other frequent choices: Sicilian Defense, Scandinavian Defense, Caro-Kann, Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense.
- Opening traits: embraces asymmetry, counterplay and practical chances over dry theoretical lines.
Top Rapid opening snapshot: Sicilian Najdorf, Sicilian, Scandinavian, Caro-Kann, Ruy Lopez (Berlin).
Performance highlights & streaks
Ansumana’s record shows longevity and volume—thousands of Rapid games and a demonstrated ability to climb into the 2100+ Rapid band. He has posted long winning runs and bounced back from slumps with characteristic resilience.
- Longest winning streak: 18 games.
- Longest losing streak: 11 games (current losing streak short and recoverable).
- Preferred hours: strong results late evening and very early morning (good win rates around 23:00 and overnight hours).
Notable traits & quirks
Funny and human moments are part of the package. Expect cheeky post-game banter, occasional coffeehouse-style gambits, and a fondness for turning games into long technical battles. Ansumana is quick to try inventive ideas—sometimes they work, sometimes they produce a “howler” (and then a brilliant swindle).
- Nickname-friendly: online friends sometimes call him a "Grinder" or "Tactics beast" depending on the day.
- Psychology notes: high comeback rate—never count him out after a slip.
- Offbeat humor: will happily play an unexpected gambit to spice up a tournament or a Simul.
Top opponents & head-to-heads
Ansumana has faced several regular rivals online. Some opponents have strong sample sizes and interesting records:
- demonul929 — 20 games (challenging matchup).
- kiko-cristim — 18 games.
- pyke24 — 17 games (positive record).
- thedutchwiz — noteworthy success (8–2).
Quick facts & useful links
- Title: Candidate Master — a recognized FIDE title reflecting strong OTB/online performance (Candidate).
- Preferred play: Rapid (Rapid), lots of high-volume monthly play during 2022–2025.
- Fun placeholder: try a glossary lookup on Botez Gambit or Loose Piece for some light banter after a wild game.
Want more?
For a quick snapshot of peak Rapid form: . To explore the rating curve over time, check the chart embedded above. (Placeholders load details in a supporting app.)
Quick summary
Nice session — you converted two complicated middlegames into wins and showed good endgame instincts (active king + passed pawns). A couple of losses highlight recurring practical issues: queenside weaknesses and back‑rank / coordination problems. Below I break down what you did well, where you lost ground, and a short plan to improve over the next week.
What you did well (repeatable strengths)
- Active king in the endgame — you used king activity decisively in the long rook+king endgame vs higher-rated opposition. That’s a huge practical edge in rapid.
- Winning complex middlegame fights — you traded into favourable endings rather than clinging to complications; that shows good judgment about simplifying when you have a plan.
- Opening repertoire works for you — you score well with Sicilian/Scandinavian/Caro-Kann lines, so your choice of dynamic openings creates practical chances.
- Good conversion under limited time — in both wins you kept the initiative and converted without excessive time trouble.
Game-by-game notes (concrete moments)
Win vs gmsudip007 — key ideas
- You handled the Pirc/Indian structure confidently: after White pushed in the centre you reacted accurately and won the central pawn race. Useful reference: Pirc Defense.
- Critical sequence: you allowed a trade that left your king central but then used king activity and passed pawns to decide the endgame. Keep valuing active king over passive pawn grabbing in these structures.
- Replay a short tactical sequence from that game: .
Win vs joluolar39 — key ideas
- You created long-term pressure on the kingside and used piece activity (rook/queen battery) to force decisive concessions. Good exploitation of open files.
- Keep practicing tactical awareness around sac ideas that open files — you spotted tactical continuations quickly.
Loss vs msltwix — lessons
- The game ended quickly after White infiltrated on the back rank / 8th rank. Work on routine back‑rank checks — your opponent exploited a rank/rook infiltration: Back rank mate.
- Queenside pawn pushes created targets and opened lines near your king. In positions where you expand on the queenside, make sure to keep a flight square for your king or an escape-plan for major pieces.
- When you see the opponent lining up rooks towards your back rank, prioritize creating luft (a pawn move, king step or exchanging off a file) rather than continuing pawn grabs.
Patterns to fix (priority list)
- Back‑rank / coordination: before every move, do a 1–2 second safety check for back-rank threats and undefended pieces (especially when rook/queen trades happen).
- Pawn pushes that make your structure loose — don’t push pawns that create holes unless they gain a concrete target or tempo. Ask: “Who benefits from this open file?”
- Transitions to the endgame — when simplifying, calculate a few moves deeper for king activity and passed-pawn potential. If the opponent’s king can become active first, avoid the simplification.
- Time management in sharp middlegames — you handled it well overall, but keep practicing 10–15 tactical puzzles under a 3–5 minute clock to simulate rapid pressure.
Concrete training plan (next 7–14 days)
- Daily tactics: 20–30 puzzles focusing on forks, pins and discovered checks. Use a mix of easy/medium to keep the solve rate high.
- Endgame drills (3× per week): king + pawn vs king, basic rook endgames, opposition and Lucena/Berger techniques. Spend at least 15 minutes per session practicing winning methodically with active king and pawn pushes.
- Opening review (2 sessions): go through the key lines you play in the Pirc/Indian and your main Sicilian branches. Make short notes of one reliable plan vs typical setups and one trap to avoid.
- One annotated rapid per day: pick a recent loss or a close game, annotate it quickly focusing on the turning point. Ask: “What was my last move’s purpose?”
Quick checklist before your next game
- Count attackers/defenders on the back rank if rooks/queens are nearby.
- If you’re pushing pawns on one wing, ensure your king has escape squares.
- Before simplifying (queen/rook trades), evaluate the resulting king activity and pawn structure.
- Make a short plan on move 10–12: where will your rooks and knights go? (helps avoid aimless moves).
Longer-term items (1–3 months)
- Systematize one reliable anti-counterplay plan in your most-played openings (your Opening Performance shows strong results in Sicilian / Scandinavian — consolidate those lines).
- Practice practical endgames (rook + pawn vs rook) until conversion becomes automatic — this will turn many close games into wins.
- Keep tracking trends — your 3‑month slope is strong. Use that momentum: small weekly improvements compound quickly.
Next steps I recommend now
- Analyze the loss vs msltwix move-by-move and add 3 improvements you would have played instead.
- Run a 10-minute tactics session right after this review to lock in the pattern-recognition reset.
- Replay the short PGN snippet from your win and note the moments where you gained space or forced simplification: .
Closing — keep building
Your volume and trend numbers show real progress (the 3‑month slope and your long-term Win/Loss record are impressive). Focus on fixing back-rank and structural weaknesses and your conversion rate will rise. If you want, I can prepare a 7‑day study schedule tailored to your openings and endgames — say the word and I’ll lay it out.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| demonul929 | 5W / 13L / 2D | View Games |
| kiko-cristim | 6W / 12L / 0D | View Games |
| pyke24 | 9W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
| quacksac | 4W / 8L / 1D | View Games |
| buibuiincanada | 6W / 5L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1616 | 2110 | ||
| 2024 | 2063 | |||
| 2023 | 1941 | |||
| 2022 | 1912 | 1889 | 1483 | |
| 2021 | 1442 | 1802 | 1857 | |
| 2020 | 1683 | 1830 | ||
| 2014 | 1620 | 1674 | ||
| 2013 | 953 | 1566 | 1643 | 1128 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1090W / 846L / 146D | 918W / 970L / 163D | 81.7 |
| 2024 | 823W / 719L / 114D | 751W / 791L / 121D | 81.1 |
| 2023 | 180W / 151L / 19D | 165W / 170L / 17D | 77.7 |
| 2022 | 612W / 488L / 78D | 529W / 556L / 83D | 81.8 |
| 2021 | 402W / 236L / 30D | 373W / 251L / 30D | 68.5 |
| 2020 | 904W / 439L / 55D | 845W / 489L / 76D | 71.0 |
| 2014 | 31W / 16L / 2D | 24W / 27L / 3D | 74.3 |
| 2013 | 166W / 97L / 15D | 166W / 114L / 13D | 68.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 98 | 51 | 42 | 5 | 52.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 76 | 31 | 40 | 5 | 40.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 61 | 37 | 24 | 0 | 60.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 60 | 29 | 28 | 3 | 48.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 54 | 32 | 19 | 3 | 59.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 54 | 35 | 18 | 1 | 64.8% |
| Scotch Game | 40 | 22 | 17 | 1 | 55.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 38 | 27 | 10 | 1 | 71.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 35 | 18 | 15 | 2 | 51.4% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 32 | 19 | 12 | 1 | 59.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1030 | 518 | 451 | 61 | 50.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 943 | 509 | 376 | 58 | 54.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 400 | 210 | 162 | 28 | 52.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 348 | 194 | 129 | 25 | 55.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 311 | 170 | 125 | 16 | 54.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 296 | 138 | 139 | 19 | 46.6% |
| Czech Defense | 286 | 141 | 123 | 22 | 49.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 261 | 130 | 115 | 16 | 49.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 260 | 138 | 105 | 17 | 53.1% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 250 | 145 | 91 | 14 | 58.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Indian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Delayed Fianchetto | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |