About Mikhail Antipov
Mikhail Antipov is a chess Grandmaster known for his sharp and dynamic play, especially in fast-paced games. Born to handle the lightning-fast tempo of blitz chess, his preferred time control is indeed blitz, where he's shown remarkable skill and tenacity against a wide range of opponents.
Playing Style & Strengths
Mikhail boasts a sophisticated playing style characterized by deep tactical awareness and strong endgame proficiency. He has an impressive comeback rate of 87.57%, showing his resilience in difficult positions, and a win rate of 56.39% even after losing a piece — talk about turning the tables!
He tends towards longer games, averaging about 80 moves per win, suggesting a dogged determination to outmaneuver opponents rather than rely on quick knockouts. His early resignation rate is a modest 0.64%, proving he's not one to throw in the towel easily.
Key Achievements
- Earned the prestigious Grandmaster title from FIDE.
- Peak blitz rating of 3073 achieved in November 2024 - clearly showing he's not just fast but fiercely strong.
- Peak bullet rating of 3012 - playing bullet chess at superhuman speeds!
- His rapid rating reached a personal best of 2681 in mid-2024.
Opening Repertoire Highlights
Mikhail exhibits a versatile opening arsenal, often catching opponents off guard:
- Blitz:** Highly successful with the Sicilian Defense: French Variation, Westerinen Attack — boasting a 75.41% win rate over 122 games.
- Consistently performs well using the Reti Opening, including the King's Indian Attack (KIA), winning over 60% of these encounters.
- Uses the classical Italian Game (Giuoco Pianissimo) frequently, with a solid near 57% win rate.
- Enjoys the Caro-Kann Exchange variation with an impressive 71.67% win rate in blitz, a favorite against toughest Swiss cheese (opponents).
His ability to mix up openings across time controls keeps opponents guessing—probably wondering if Mikhail actually has a secret strategy manual.
Notable Opponents & Rivalries
Mikhail has squared off against some high-level players multiple times, highlighting his competitive presence:
- Faced alexrustemov 105 times with a near even score (49.52% win rate for Mikhail).
- Played danielnaroditsky 95 times, a formidable opponent with a slightly tougher record there, but Mikhail still holds his ground.
- Engaged with rud_makarian 66 times and trimitziosp7 60 times, showcasing his extensive experience in competitive blitz.
Fun Facts
- Mikhail's best time of day to play is 6 AM — early bird gets the checkmate!
- His longest winning streak is an impressive 18 games — talk about chess on fire!
- Despite staggering blitz play, he maintains psychological composure with a low tilt factor of 8.
Summary
Mikhail Antipov is the kind of grandmaster who thrives under pressure, bringing his rapid calculation ability and tactical genius to the board with speed and precision. Whether blitzing opponents into submission or patiently grinding out long games, his versatile opening choices and solid endgame skills make him a tough challenge for anyone lucky (or unlucky) enough to cross swords with him.
Overall Performance Assessment
Your recent games show a solidity in your play, demonstrated by a strength adjusted win rate of approximately 50%. This indicates balanced results against opponents of varying levels. Although your rating has seen a slight dip of 7 points over the past month and a larger decrease over 3 months, the 6-month trend remains strongly positive, reflecting long-term improvement.
Keep focusing on consistency to convert this steady performance into sustained rating gains.
Game Review Highlights
- Strong Opening Repertoire: You frequently employ sharp and well-studied openings such as the Sicilian Defense and the Giuoco Piano, showing good theoretical knowledge. Your usage of these shows understanding of key strategic and tactical ideas.
- Solid Tactical Awareness: In your wins, you exhibited good awareness in capitalizing on opponent's inaccuracies. Notably, in your final win, you created a decisive mating net efficiently.
- Opportunities in Endgame: Some losses appear to involve missed defensive resources or stronger endgame technique from your opponents. Improving your endgame understanding could help convert advantageous positions and resist counterplay.
Areas for Improvement
- Opening Adjustments: While your opening choice is solid, working on handling early pressure and avoiding early exchanges that simplify into inferior positions can reduce vulnerabilities. For example, in some losses, early queen trades or piece exchanges contributed to a weakened stance.
- Time Management: Maintaining steady time usage, especially in critical moments, is key. Avoiding rushed moves can prevent tactical oversights.
- Endgame Technique: Focus on practicing fundamental endgames and common patterns to increase confidence in converting advantages or defending tough positions.
- Handling Pressure in Middle Games: Develop defensive resources and counterattack ideas to better cope under your opponent’s initiatives, especially when under pressure in complex positions.
Strategic Suggestions
- Review your recent losses carefully and identify key moments — were there missed defensive moves or alternative plans?
- Analyze your wins to reinforce successful strategies and replicate those approaches in future games.
- Engage regularly in tactical training to sharpen your calculation skills under time pressure.
- Consider exploring additional variations or sidelines in your opening repertoire to surprise opponents and avoid heavily analyzed lines.
- Maintain a positive mindset – the recent upward slope in your 1-month rating trend is encouraging.
Final Encouragement
Your consistent effort and results show great potential. Keep studying, practicing, and learning from each game. With focus on maintaining time balance, sharpening endgame play, and building strategic adjustments, your performance and rating will continue to rise.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Levy Rozman | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Pranav Anand | 2W / 2L / 1D | |
| Alexei Saveliev | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Rinat Jumabayev | 1W / 2L / 1D | |
| Vladimir Seliverstov | 8W / 2L / 1D | |
| Νik kontos | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Momchil Petkov | 3W / 7L / 1D | |
| Nigel Short | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| singuiar_brain_ceil | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| theduck | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Rustemov | 55W / 40L / 15D | |
| Daniel Naroditsky | 42W / 49L / 6D | |
| Rudik Makarian | 32W / 27L / 7D | |
| Petros Trimitzios | 29W / 28L / 3D | |
| Luka Budisavljevic | 43W / 10L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3034 | 2987 | 2637 | |
| 2024 | 2893 | 2624 | 2618 | 400 |
| 2023 | 2879 | 2970 | 2654 | |
| 2022 | 2900 | 2882 | 2576 | |
| 2021 | 2830 | 2822 | 2532 | |
| 2020 | 2914 | 2869 | 2283 | |
| 2019 | 2667 | 2799 | ||
| 2018 | 2706 | 2787 | ||
| 2017 | 2634 | 2745 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 169W / 84L / 26D | 156W / 101L / 21D | 87.9 |
| 2024 | 158W / 69L / 29D | 129W / 98L / 25D | 88.1 |
| 2023 | 288W / 129L / 52D | 218W / 191L / 58D | 88.3 |
| 2022 | 285W / 128L / 44D | 255W / 158L / 45D | 86.9 |
| 2021 | 133W / 76L / 20D | 123W / 90L / 19D | 84.6 |
| 2020 | 171W / 85L / 21D | 165W / 106L / 22D | 89.5 |
| 2019 | 323W / 182L / 44D | 315W / 196L / 49D | 82.2 |
| 2018 | 342W / 204L / 37D | 334W / 216L / 48D | 84.3 |
| 2017 | 192W / 51L / 9D | 159W / 79L / 10D | 79.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 242 | 140 | 80 | 22 | 57.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 223 | 137 | 73 | 13 | 61.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 195 | 122 | 51 | 22 | 62.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 194 | 132 | 49 | 13 | 68.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 138 | 56 | 58 | 24 | 40.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 133 | 69 | 56 | 8 | 51.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 130 | 76 | 50 | 4 | 58.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 125 | 74 | 46 | 5 | 59.2% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 115 | 57 | 49 | 9 | 49.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 108 | 71 | 31 | 6 | 65.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 37 | 14 | 15 | 8 | 37.8% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 15 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 66.7% |
| Four Knights Game | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 41.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 54.5% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 33.3% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 52 | 35 | 16 | 1 | 67.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 49 | 32 | 15 | 2 | 65.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 44 | 29 | 12 | 3 | 65.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 38 | 22 | 14 | 2 | 57.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 34 | 25 | 6 | 3 | 73.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 32 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 68.8% |
| King's Indian Attack | 32 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 30 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 53.3% |
| Australian Defense | 25 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 56.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 23 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 65.2% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 1 |