Profile Summary: Aplommb – The Candidate Master
Meet Aplommb, a chess player with the distinguished title of Candidate Master awarded by FIDE. Known for a blend of tactical brilliance and relentless endgame dedication, Aplommb dances across the chessboard with a style that screams "calm under pressure" – except maybe against the Italian Game, which apparently has their number.
Journey Through the Ratings
Aplommb’s peak performances shine brightest in bullet and blitz where lightning-fast instincts dominate. The peak blitz rating touched an eye-watering 2658 in early 2025, while the bullet rating reached an impressive 2571 a couple of months later. Rapid play has been more of a steady cruise, maxing out around 2210 back in mid-2020.
Performance & Style
With a remarkable 88.7% comeback rate and the tenacity to win over half the games even after losing a piece, Aplommb isn't easily rattled. They prefer to see their matches through, with an endgame frequency of nearly 78% and an average game length nearing 73 moves – the marathon runner of the chess world, never quite sprinting out early.
Surprisingly, Aplommb occasionally taps out early, but only at a mere 2.24% early resignation rate. The psychological resilience can wobble just a tad after tough losses (an admirable tilt factor of 5), but nothing that a good night's sleep can't fix.
Opening Repertoire Highlights
- Rapid: Master of the Unknown Opening with a solid 66% win rate, although the Old Benoni and King's Indian Attack French Variation don't seem to favor them much.
- Bullet: Loves mixing it up, with strong showings in the Indian Game London System and clever gambits like the Englund Gambit, winning 100% of these spicy engagements.
- Blitz: Versatile in many openings including the Queen's Gambit Declined Exchange and the Four Knights Game Scotch Variation, often leaving opponents wondering what just happened.
Biggest Rivalries & Triumphs
Aplommb’s most frequently faced foe is chessplayertanu, against whom they hold a strong win rate of 65.38%. Classic foes like kobemagic and brick_bruiser keep the adrenaline pumping with games full of twists and turns.
Recent Battles
In one of the freshest victories, Aplommb expertly outmaneuvered opponent KCA64 in a timely resignation after a tactical squeeze in a Modern Defense Pterodactyl Semi-Averbakh Variation. The game was a rollercoaster with aggressive piece play and a final bishop move sealing the deal before KCA64 could blink.
Yet, in the whimsical world of chess, even Aplommb faces defeats; notably against lower-rated players, proving even the Candidate Master is never immune to the chaos on the board.
Fun Fact
If you want to catch Aplommb at their best, set your chess clock to 7PM – their psychological prime time with an 85.7% win rate! Clearly, this is when the mental juice is flowing and the keyboard dust flies.
Summary
Whether you love bullet blitz battles or lengthy rapid duels, Aplommb offers an exciting chess journey filled with solid preparation, tactical awareness, and just enough unpredictability to keep everyone on their toes. Candidate Master? More like Candidate Magician.
What you’re doing well
Your results show you handle solid, positionally sound systems well. In particular, you’ve had very strong performance with the London System setup (Poisoned Pawn Variation), which suggests you understand typical middlegame plans from that structure and can keep steady pressure while developing pieces calmly.
- You convert initiative from solid openings into concrete chances, especially when your pieces become active on open files and diagonals.
- Even in complex middlegames, you find ways to keep pieces coordinated and look for tactical opportunities when the opponent overextends.
- Your ability to stay with a plan in openings like the Slav-related lines shows you can maintain a coherent approach rather than drifting into unfocused complications.
What to improve
- Short-term consistency: the recent short-term trend suggests you’ve hit a rough patch. Use a focused post-game review routine to identify 2–3 recurring mistakes (for example, untimely material concessions, missed tactical shots, or poorly judged exchanges) and build targeted fixes.
- Endgame technique and conversion: several games moved into lengthier endings. Strengthen rook endings and king activity timing so you can convert small advantages into wins or hold draws when necessary.
- Opening preparation balance: your strong results in familiar lines are great. Consider adding a compact, reliable sub-repertoire for a few common defenses you face, with 2–3 main move orders and a simple plan after typical middlegame transpositions.
- Time management in rapid games: practice establishing a clear plan by the 15th move so you don’t drift into overlong middlegames. Build a habit of quick, high-quality first passes on the opening and then deepen selectively.
- Tactical pattern recognition: incorporate regular tactic drills to reduce missed tactical opportunities and to spot typical motifs (forks, pins, skewers) more quickly in dynamic positions.
Actionable plan to level up
- Endgame focus (2 weeks): practice rook endings, king and pawn endings, and basic fortress ideas. Do 15–20 minutes of endgame drills a few times this month and review any you misplay in games.
- Opening consolidation (2–4 weeks): keep London System (Poisoned Pawn) as a reliable choice, and add a compact Slav/Modern line if you face one frequently. Create a simple repertoire cheat sheet summarizing 6–8 key ideas for the middlegame after each main line.
- Tactics and patterns (ongoing): commit to 15 minutes of daily tactic practice focused on common middlegame motifs you encounter in your rapid games.
- Post-game analysis routine: after each rapid game, record 2–3 takeaways. If possible, annotate with a quick note showing the critical moment and your improvement plan.
- Time-management drill: designate a “planning phase” in each game (first 8–12 moves) and practice sticking to a time ceiling (e.g., 3–4 minutes for the opening, then reassess).
Starter study resources
- Endgame practice: Aplommb
- Endgame Training: Endgame Training
- Tactics Drills: Tactics Drills
- Opening Repertoire: Opening Repertoire
Recent game highlights (brief notes)
- Win summary: you navigated a sharp middlegame and pressed a decisive break; after a tense sequence, you reached a winning simplification. Next time, try to identify the exact moment you gain a clear material or positional edge and aim to liquidate into a clean endgame quickly.
- Loss summary: your opponent challenged your structure with a tactical shot; use this as a learning moment to recognize early signs of overextension and to seek simpler, safer plans when material balance is uncertain.
- Draw summary: you stayed active in the later phase and kept pressure, but review the moments where you could have traded more cleanly or kept the initiative longer without risking a repetition.
Notes on rating trends
Short-term trends show a dip in recent activity, while longer-term trends appear steadier. Use this as motivation to build steady, repeatable routines (opening prep, tactic practice, and post-game analysis) to restore momentum without overloading yourself. Small, consistent improvements add up over time.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| aplecons | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| chesspilot01 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| portugalskaya-raketa | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| tacticaldeep | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chessplayertanu | 34W / 14L / 4D | |
| kobemagic | 10W / 10L / 4D | |
| Brick_Bruiser | 11W / 8L / 0D | |
| starkast | 2W / 9L / 1D | |
| Niji183 | 3W / 3L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2509 | 2604 | 572 | |
| 2024 | 2340 | |||
| 2023 | 2211 | 572 | ||
| 2022 | 2302 | 2653 | 1914 | |
| 2021 | 1914 | |||
| 2020 | 2252 | 2407 | 1914 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46W / 33L / 6D | 41W / 43L / 6D | 77.1 |
| 2024 | 8W / 2L / 1D | 7W / 4L / 0D | 68.0 |
| 2023 | 4W / 4L / 0D | 2W / 5L / 1D | 61.6 |
| 2022 | 15W / 7L / 2D | 26W / 20L / 3D | 73.9 |
| 2021 | 10W / 3L / 1D | 11W / 7L / 2D | 63.1 |
| 2020 | 34W / 17L / 2D | 34W / 16L / 3D | 74.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Döry Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Scotch Game | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 21 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 76.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 29.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Slav Defense | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Classical Variation | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Bogoljubow Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 1 |
| Losing | 6 | 0 |