Mario Gavilán Díaz
FIDE Master & Twitch Streamer Extraordinaire
Mario Gavilán Díaz, also known in the online battlefield as AquivaRubinstein, is not just your average chess player—he's a bona fide FIDE Master, a title earned through countless hours of cunning, strategy, and perhaps a few lucky knight forks. Known for his love of blitz chess, Mario has dazzled opponents with ratings soaring above 2600, proving that quick thinking and rapid reflexes can indeed conquer the board.
When Mario isn’t streaming his games or climbing the online leaderboard, he's plotting his next opening with the precision of a Swiss watch. His signature weapons include the Nimzo Indian Defense Classical Variation and the Alekhines Defense Scandinavian Variation, both reflecting his versatile and sometimes unpredictable style.
With an impressive comeback rate close to 90%, Mario isn't just about bulldozing through his games—he’s a master of the epic comeback, turning what looks like disaster into dazzling victories. With nearly half of his wins coming from resignations by opponents, it's safe to say his presence on the board inspires a bit of existential dread.
But don't be fooled by his intensity—streaming has given Mario a chance to showcase not only his chess skills but also his wit and charm. Spectators tune in as much for his sharp moves as for his occasional cheeky commentary. After all, chess might be serious business, but Mario knows a good laugh (and a good blunder) when he sees one.
Whether it's bullet, blitz, or rapid, Mario continues to impress and entertain. Always pushing the limits of his rating, with peaks like a 2618 blitz rating in early 2025, he’s a force to watch—both on the board and on screen.
Fun Fact:
At his best hour—8 AM—Mario is practically unbeatable, proving that even grandmasters need their morning coffee.
Player: Mario Gavilán Díaz — daily game feedback
Here is a concise review of your two most recent daily games: one win and one loss. The goal is to reinforce what you’re doing well and outline practical steps to improve in future games.
What you did well
- Initiative and tactical awareness: In your win, you created and converted active lines that pressure the opponent’s king. Your willingness to engage in sharp tactics helped you turn an initiative into material and positional gains.
- Active piece play and open files: You looked for opportunities to activate rooks and the queen along open files, which put your opponent under continuous pressure and kept your pieces coordinated during the middlegame.
- Endgame conversion: You finished the winning line with clear follow-through, keeping control of key files and creating decisive threats, which is a strong sign of practical conversion skills.
Areas to improve
- Clarity of middlegame plans: In the loss, the middlegame became a bit scattered with multiple threats. Practice identifying a single, concrete plan early in the middlegame (for example, control of a key file, or targeting a specific weakness in the opponent’s camp) and aim to steer exchanges toward that plan.
- King safety during exchanges: Some exchanges can open lines against your own king. Before trading, quickly check whether the resulting structure improves your opponent’s attacking chances or weakens your own king safety. If so, seek alternatives that maintain relative safety while preserving activity.
- Decision-making under pressure: In complex positions, it’s easy to miss a forcing line or overcommit to a trade. Build a simple three-branch thought process: (1) what is the biggest threat by the opponent, (2) what is my strongest plan, (3) what is the best concrete line to pursue. This helps avoid rushed, suboptimal trades.
Opening notes and repertoire context
Your recorded openings show experience with the Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Barnes Defense. That combination gives you both dynamic play and solid structural ideas. To build on this, consider these quick focus areas:
- For Nimzo-Larsen Attack: reinforce a clear plan after 1. b3 and Bb2. Typical ideas include quick f4 breaks or central pawn advances to challenge Black’s setup, plus careful king safety as you expand on the queenside.
- For Barnes Defense and similar flexible defenses: practice recognizing common pawn structures and typical piece maneuvers for Black, so you can anticipate opponent plans and counter them efficiently.
Concrete practice plan for the next sessions
- Post-game notes: After each game, write 3 takeaways—one strength, one area to improve, and one concrete plan for the next game. This builds a quick, actionable learning loop.
- Pattern training: Do 15 minutes of tactical puzzles daily that emphasize open-file activity, piece coordination, and common king-attack motifs you encountered in your games.
- Opening study: Pick one line within Nimzo-Larsen Attack to deepen (e.g., the Bb2 development and central pawn breaks), and outline the typical middlegame plan and common counterplans for both sides.
- Endgame practice: Include at least one short endgame drill per week (rook endings or queen+rook endings) to improve conversion and technique under pressure.
Next steps
If you’d like, I can annotate a specific game move-by-move to highlight exact decision points and suggested improvements. I can also provide a compact one-page checklist for your next training block to keep you focused during games.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Anusha Subramanian | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| gmarkovic21 | 1W / 3L / 1D | |
| jessicahyatt | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| johndoe698 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| laico | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Matthieu Saint-Guily | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| quercusrobur22 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| taglit | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Olga Yushko | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| chessdevotee26 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Kim Sergey | 7W / 8L / 1D | |
| Pablo Salinas Herrera | 4W / 12L / 0D | |
| Kelvin Sánchez | 8W / 6L / 0D | |
| kyurkchiyski54 | 6W / 6L / 1D | |
| purehorses | 4W / 6L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2572 | 2439 | 846 | |
| 2024 | 2588 | |||
| 2023 | 2501 | 2420 | ||
| 2022 | 2500 | 2508 | 2420 | |
| 2021 | 2450 | 2218 | ||
| 2020 | 2206 | 2448 | 2203 | |
| 2019 | 2490 | |||
| 2018 | 2418 | |||
| 2017 | 2305 | |||
| 2016 | 2146 | |||
| 2015 | 1941 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 64W / 51L / 11D | 53W / 65L / 12D | 86.7 |
| 2024 | 76W / 49L / 11D | 53W / 72L / 16D | 83.3 |
| 2023 | 79W / 69L / 11D | 63W / 87L / 17D | 80.0 |
| 2022 | 128W / 135L / 27D | 118W / 146L / 27D | 83.0 |
| 2021 | 66W / 68L / 13D | 65W / 72L / 18D | 84.4 |
| 2020 | 363W / 328L / 51D | 324W / 339L / 63D | 81.0 |
| 2019 | 54W / 32L / 9D | 45W / 46L / 7D | 75.0 |
| 2018 | 47W / 42L / 12D | 54W / 50L / 7D | 85.0 |
| 2017 | 39W / 26L / 5D | 25W / 38L / 10D | 88.0 |
| 2016 | 6W / 0L / 0D | 3W / 2L / 2D | 62.8 |
| 2015 | 7W / 0L / 0D | 6W / 1L / 0D | 58.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 109 | 52 | 50 | 7 | 47.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 95 | 44 | 44 | 7 | 46.3% |
| Australian Defense | 82 | 33 | 40 | 9 | 40.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 78 | 33 | 37 | 8 | 42.3% |
| Döry Defense | 73 | 37 | 31 | 5 | 50.7% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 69 | 27 | 38 | 4 | 39.1% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 60 | 32 | 26 | 2 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation | 60 | 28 | 29 | 3 | 46.7% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 57 | 27 | 23 | 7 | 47.4% |
| Benko Gambit | 56 | 28 | 24 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 15 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 80.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Modern Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense Accepted | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Nbd7 5.e3 c6 6.Nf3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |