Anahita Zahedifar - Woman FIDE Master
Meet Anahita Zahedifar, a chess tactician whose blitz and bullet speeds make her opponents wish they had a time machine. Awarded the prestigious Woman FIDE Master title by FIDE, Anahita is no stranger to intense battles on the 64 squares.
Since bursting onto the scene in 2019 with a blitz rating of 1638, she's catapulted her bullet rating to a dizzying 2725 in 2025 — faster than most humans can blink, let alone calculate a winning fork! With a bullet win rate soaring over 60%, her rapid improvements and daring strategies leave her rivals scrambling.
Some fun stats: Anahita’s longest winning streak stands at an impressive 10 games, and her endgame prowess is evident, frequently engaging deep into the trenches (with average winning games stretching past 76 moves!). A comeback artist, she boasts a 90.81% comeback rate and a remarkable 100% win rate after losing a piece — basically, don’t count her out when the chips are down.
She tends to hover around a 55% win rate with the white pieces and 52% with black, proving mastery no matter the color. Notoriously merciful with only 1.46% early resignations, Anahita fights till the end, a true gladiator of the chessboard.
When asked about her playing style, she'd probably say: “Why settle for a normal game when you can make your opponent sweat every move?” Off the board, her psychological resilience shines with a tilt factor of only 8 (chess players know how rare that is!).
Whether it’s Tuesday at 11 AM or a midnight duel, her win rates remain strong, peaking at an undefeated 100% at 11 PM — perfect for those last-minute challenges.
Opponents beware: this is more than just a player; Anahita Zahedifar is a whirlwind on the chessboard, blending skill, speed, and a sprinkle of wit.
Hi Anahita!
These notes are based on your last dozen blitz games (wins and losses). Overall you play sharp, initiative–oriented chess and have already reached a peak blitz rating of 2587 (2025-05-27). Below is an honest balance-sheet of your strengths and the most urgent improvement points.
What’s working well
- Opening initiative with c4 + g3 set-ups. You steer the game into Fianchetto English / King’s Indian Attack positions where you understand typical plans (e.g. early ...d5 breaks as Black or d4/e4 pushes as White).
- Spotting tactical motifs. In several wins you converted the initiative quickly by combining piece activity with direct king attacks, e.g. the Ne6+ / Rxf8+ / Qg8# sequence:
- Time management in winning games. When things are going your way you keep 15–20 s on the clock, enough to finish cleanly.
Recurring problems in recent losses
- Over-extension without a concrete follow-up. Moves like 22.h3 vs dawid498 left weak dark squares and cost tempi just before the critical phase.
- Handling of counter-sacrifices. The exchange sac …Rxe2! caught you off guard: Result: you lost two tempi reorganising, and Black’s pieces flooded in.
- End-game technique under 10 s. Three recent games slipped from equal/plus to lost in queen- or rook-endings. Typical symptoms: pushing pawns too early, ignoring checking distance, not activating the king.
Training priorities (next 4–6 weeks)
- Practical end-games – daily 10-minute drill on simplified positions: 4-pawn rook endings, queen vs rook/pawn, and opposition king endings. (Use the ⏲️ to stay under 30 s per move.)
- Anti-sacrifice vigilance. Add “search for opponent’s forcing moves” to every move checklist, especially before pushing side pawns. When you see a rook on an open file ask: “Can exchange sacrifice work against me right now?”
- Central tension management. In the English Four Knights you often release the tension with dxc4 / Nxd5 too soon. Try holding the tension 1–2 extra moves; review the model game Carlsen–So, Wijk 2024 (same structure).
14-day action plan
| Day | Task (≈30 min) |
|---|---|
| 1–2 | Review your own losses; annotate the exact move where evaluation swings ≥ 1.5. |
| 3–5 | End-game drill: 20 rook-vs-rook+pawn studies. |
| 6–7 | Solve 30 tactical puzzles featuring …Rxe2, …Bxh3, etc. |
| 8–10 | Play 10 practice games starting from move 10 of your typical English positions; analyse without engine first. |
| 11–12 | Flash-card the critical pawn structures you reach most (English vs …e5, KIA vs …d5). |
| 13–14 | One themed tournament focusing on queen end-games (Chess.com End-game bots or sparring partner). |
Performance rhythm
Your win-rate peaks between 18:00–20:00 local time and dips sharply after midnight:
Weekend sessions show a steadier performance curve:Quick reminders before each blitz session
- 90-second warm-up puzzle.
- First opening branch that deviates ⇒ pause 2 seconds.
- Under 15 s: play safe moves (king safety, no hanging pieces) rather than the prettiest line.
Keep the momentum going, Anahita – small, focused tweaks will push you well past the 2700 blitz mark. Enjoy the process and good luck at the board!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ramtin_tavosi_rad | 14W / 12L / 1D | View Games |
| aswqzxdfvd | 9W / 12L / 0D | View Games |
| Jhay-R Sumagang | 3W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| iamanoush | 3W / 1L / 2D | View Games |
| dzejdoubles | 0W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2614 | 2545 | 2271 | |
| 2024 | 2504 | 2269 | 2271 | |
| 2023 | 2500 | 2326 | 2305 | |
| 2022 | 2405 | |||
| 2021 | 2194 | 2074 | ||
| 2020 | 2207 | 2192 | 2107 | |
| 2019 | 1638 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 66W / 41L / 3D | 59W / 45L / 7D | 86.6 |
| 2024 | 5W / 2L / 1D | 4W / 3L / 0D | 62.7 |
| 2023 | 12W / 11L / 1D | 16W / 7L / 2D | 76.6 |
| 2022 | 2W / 3L / 0D | 3W / 2L / 0D | 69.4 |
| 2021 | 9W / 3L / 2D | 11W / 1L / 3D | 86.1 |
| 2020 | 79W / 61L / 18D | 72W / 76L / 11D | 78.4 |
| 2019 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 80.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 17 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 76.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 24 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 27 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Slav Defense | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 30.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 25.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Belyavsky Gambit | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 1 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |