Player Profile: arctic_t00
Arctic_t00 is an enthusiastic chess competitor known for tackling all time controls, from lightning-fast bullet to more measured rapid games. Their first recorded online activities go back to 2013, marking the start of a steady climb in both skill and confidence. Over the years, they have played thousands of blitz games, and their ratings have risen into the upper echelons, reflecting both dedication and resilience at the board.
In blitz play, they have amassed over 5,500 games, demonstrating a preference for quick and dynamic chess. Their white pieces tend to score around 47%, while the black pieces hold close at around 44%. Meanwhile, in bullet, their aggressive style and swiftness have led them to high success rates, with a win percentage of nearly 58% in standard bullet formats. They also occasionally test their skills in Chess960 and bughouse variants, showcasing a willingness to explore different forms of the game.
Known for a strong “comeback factor,” Arctic_t00 manages to recover even after material deficits, as shown by a high rate of winning games in situations where they lose a piece. Their average win typically spans more than 80 moves, hinting that they relish deeper struggles and often carry the fight into the endgame — a phase they enter regularly, given an endgame frequency above 85%. Although their tilt factor (18) suggests some vulnerability to consecutive setbacks, an excellent winning streak record of 13 consecutive victories underscores that they can maintain focus and form for extended periods.
Interesting habits include a higher success rate in later evening hours and a distinctive surge in performance when matched in rated arenas compared to casual play. Off the board, these patterns highlight an adaptable mindset and unwavering commitment to self-improvement. As a result, Arctic_t00 has become a well-rounded player, comfortable in prolonged positional struggles or rapid-fire tactical encounters.
What You're Doing Well
Teodora, your recent games show that you have strong positional understanding and good tactical awareness. Here are a few highlights from your recent performances:
- You handle complex openings like the King's Indian Defense and Slav Defense confidently, achieving good win rates, especially in aggressive systems such as the Amar Gambit and Nimzo-Larsen Attack.
- Your calculated pawn breaks and piece activity in middlegames often give you solid attacking chances, as demonstrated in your wins.
- You effectively convert advantages in rapid time controls, maintaining focus under time pressure, which is crucial in fast-paced games.
- Your ability to transition into favorable endgames from tactical skirmishes is evident, showing good foresight and technique.
Areas for Improvement
Every player has room to improve, and focusing on these areas can help you increase your performance further:
- Opening Consistency: While you excel in some openings, exploring consistent plans in lines where your win rate is lower, like the Czech Defense, can broaden your repertoire and reduce early challenges.
- Handling Pressure in Critical Moments: Some losses showed you facing difficulties in complex middlegame positions and endgames. Working on calculation accuracy and defensive resourcefulness can help you hold better under pressure.
- Time Management: The clock times show some moments where you have very little time remaining. Practicing better time allocation could prevent rushed decisions in crucial moves.
- Endgame Technique: Improving practical endgame skills will allow you to confidently convert small advantages and defend slightly worse positions.
Next Steps to Boost Your Play
Here are actionable suggestions tailored to your recent games and performance trends:
- Review and deepen your understanding of openings with lower success rates by studying typical plans, key pawn structures, and common traps to increase confidence.
- Analyze your recent losses to pinpoint tactical oversights and recurring strategic mistakes, then incorporate targeted exercises to address them.
- Implement a disciplined time management approach during games, perhaps dividing your available time by number of moves to balance calculation and intuition.
- Engage in focused endgame training, especially rook and minor piece endgames, to sharpen your technique and practical decision making.
- Consider using Teodora Injac's recent wins like the one against MasterAmy as study material to reinforce what works well — such as your aggressive control of open files and effective piece coordination.
Keep Up the Momentum
Your recent rating improvements show the fruits of your efforts. To maintain and accelerate your progress, stay consistent with practice and continue learning from each game experience. Confidence and patience combined with steady improvement in the areas mentioned will help you climb higher.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ivan Aldokhin | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| Alexey Furtuna | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| bach12345_lfay | 7W / 4L / 1D | |
| Oliver Dimakiling | 3W / 3L / 1D | |
| Angelo Etienne | 2W / 2L / 1D | |
| icecreamiscream | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Bakhtiyar Askarov | 0W / 4L / 0D | |
| supermanaa | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Safal Bora | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| junkratisthebest1 | 2W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Anis Achour | 75W / 60L / 24D | |
| Nikola Radovanovic | 2W / 61L / 21D | |
| Vahap Sanal | 12W / 54L / 10D | |
| Jeffinho023 | 12W / 22L / 7D | |
| Bosko Tomic | 22W / 13L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2800 | |||
| 2024 | 2688 | |||
| 2023 | 2493 | 2592 | ||
| 2022 | 2712 | |||
| 2021 | 2703 | |||
| 2020 | 2343 | 2614 | 2208 | |
| 2019 | 1871 | 2315 | ||
| 2018 | 2385 | 2376 | ||
| 2017 | 2200 | 2435 | ||
| 2016 | 2020 | |||
| 2015 | 2000 | |||
| 2014 | 2001 | |||
| 2013 | 1357 | 1760 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 314W / 251L / 60D | 296W / 278L / 63D | 85.2 |
| 2024 | 368W / 347L / 91D | 358W / 360L / 96D | 86.5 |
| 2023 | 203W / 174L / 50D | 168W / 233L / 42D | 88.2 |
| 2022 | 24W / 10L / 6D | 13W / 22L / 3D | 91.1 |
| 2021 | 29W / 31L / 7D | 41W / 22L / 5D | 88.1 |
| 2020 | 116W / 89L / 22D | 120W / 98L / 16D | 85.9 |
| 2019 | 13W / 13L / 5D | 10W / 19L / 4D | 68.1 |
| 2018 | 120W / 130L / 17D | 119W / 133L / 13D | 74.9 |
| 2017 | 313W / 278L / 51D | 279W / 305L / 50D | 81.8 |
| 2016 | 3W / 3L / 1D | 4W / 3L / 1D | 80.9 |
| 2015 | 6W / 8L / 4D | 6W / 12L / 1D | 82.1 |
| 2014 | 54W / 54L / 16D | 44W / 70L / 13D | 70.4 |
| 2013 | 24W / 22L / 4D | 31W / 18L / 1D | 85.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 262 | 118 | 119 | 25 | 45.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 227 | 113 | 94 | 20 | 49.8% |
| Döry Defense | 223 | 102 | 100 | 21 | 45.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 191 | 85 | 88 | 18 | 44.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 149 | 62 | 70 | 17 | 41.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 148 | 60 | 70 | 18 | 40.5% |
| East Indian Defense | 146 | 71 | 60 | 15 | 48.6% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 130 | 58 | 64 | 8 | 44.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 123 | 62 | 47 | 14 | 50.4% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 118 | 54 | 52 | 12 | 45.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 30.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| French Defense | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 18 | 1 |