Michael Bodek – International Master of the Chessboard
Meet Michael Bodek, an International Master who has danced with kings and queens on more chessboards than most people have had hot dinners. Known for an impressive blitz rating peaking at a blistering 2878, Michael’s lightning-fast calculations and unyielding tactical prowess make opponents question their life choices—and their opening strategies.
A Career in Overdrive
Starting around 2018, Michael blasted through the blitz ranks, jumping from an already respectable 2489 to nearly 2800 within a few years. His bullet chess performances are no less fearsome, boasting a max rating north of 2880. It’s fair to say that if speed chess were the Olympics, Michael would be draped in gold.
Style & Strategy
Michael’s games are marathons and sprints rolled into one. With an average of 82 moves per win in blitz and a whopping 79% endgame frequency, he’s as comfortable in the trenches as he is in rapid-fire skirmishes. White pieces yield a slightly better result than black, but don’t let that fool you—both sides are fertile ground for his relentless assault.
Tactical Wizardry & Comeback King
Known for incredible resilience, Michael’s comeback rate stands at an astounding 90%, and if he loses a piece, opponents might as well start packing up—the win rate after losing material is a perfect 100%. While he rarely suffers one-sided defeats (under 2%), his psychological tilt factor is surprisingly humble at 10, proving he keeps his cool in the heat of battle... most of the time.
Rivalries & Relationships
Michael’s buddy list reads like a who’s who of online chess, with regular clashes against bm_on_icc (94 games), gm_dmitrij, and brandonjacobson. The win rates vary, but it’s the fierce competition that fuels Michael's fire. Notably, certain opponents see a clean sweep while others maintain a stubborn defense, often leaving Michael checking his own moves.
Chess, Life, and Humor
If chess is a battlefield, Michael Bodek is its witty general—quick with a quip when the knight forks his queen, and gracious when the rook crashes through his defenses. An early resignation rate under 1% suggests he fights to the bitter end (or until the coffee runs out), and his games provide lessons, drama, and sometimes a miracle comeback that keeps viewers glued to their screens.
In short, Michael is not just a player but a chess phenomenon who turns 64 squares into a symphony of strategy, speed, and subtle mind games. Challenge him if you dare—but remember, in the war of kings, Michael Bodek is an opponent to respect.
Feedback for Michael Bodek
Michael, reviewing your recent games, here are some constructive observations to help accelerate your improvement:
Strengths:
- Opening Knowledge: You demonstrate a solid grasp of classical opening principles, especially in the Caro-Kann and Sicilian Defense structures. Your early piece development and king safety are generally consistent.
- Tactical Awareness: Your ability to spot and execute tactical motifs is good, as shown in multiple games where you capitalize on opponent inaccuracies, including decisive mating nets and winning material.
- Endgame Technique: When transitioning to endgames, you handle piece coordination well, converting advantages with active moves and careful calculation.
Areas to Improve:
- Precision in the Midgame: A few games revealed some missed chances to increase pressure, particularly in pawn breaks and exchanges. Look for opportunities to challenge your opponent’s strongholds timely, such as advancing key pawns or rearranging your pieces for better control.
- Time Management: In some losses, you were under time pressure near the endgame phase, which likely contributed to inaccuracies. Practicing a steadier time allocation during all stages could help avoid these rushed decisions.
- Positional Play: Focusing more on long-term plans, such as identifying weak squares and improving your pawn structure, will complement your tactical strengths and make your attacks more difficult to parry.
Next Steps:
- Review key moments in your losses, especially where exchanges or pawn decisions changed the evaluation substantially.
- Focus on exercises improving calculation depth and visualization to catch tactics quicker and avoid oversights.
- Balance your clock so that time pressure is minimized in critical positions, giving you space to think through complex decisions.
Keep up the good work, and remember that consistent study and reflection on your games is very productive. If you’d like, I can help analyze specific positions or themes in your games more deeply.
Highlight - Most Recent Win:
You played a well-crafted game in the Caro-Kann Defense, successfully launching an attack on the kingside and finishing with a neat checkmate using a queen and bishop coordination. Keep leveraging such tactical finishes!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jack Rodgers | 3W / 2L / 1D | |
| bcemmat | 3W / 0L / 3D | |
| Amilal Munkhdalai | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| icecreamiscream | 0W / 3L / 1D | |
| kawhilockdown | 1W / 3L / 1D | |
| Roberto Junio Brito Molina | 0W / 1L / 4D | |
| Vladyslav Sydoryka | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| unforgettable-momeries | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| mnedev | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| jarred-vanderbilt | 2W / 1L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Leo Bispo | 45W / 25L / 8D | |
| Dmitrij Kollars | 14W / 16L / 10D | |
| OutOfAces | 14W / 13L / 5D | |
| Anatoly Bykhovsky | 14W / 16L / 1D | |
| ErnestoGuevaraLynch | 18W / 9L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2816 | |||
| 2024 | 2603 | 2757 | ||
| 2023 | 2606 | 2806 | ||
| 2022 | 2703 | 2796 | ||
| 2021 | 2719 | 2743 | 2488 | |
| 2020 | 2491 | 2542 | 2463 | |
| 2019 | 2439 | 2495 | 2422 | 1479 |
| 2018 | 2495 | 2489 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 121W / 74L / 25D | 108W / 91L / 22D | 85.6 |
| 2024 | 300W / 189L / 60D | 253W / 225L / 73D | 84.7 |
| 2023 | 132W / 85L / 26D | 112W / 101L / 32D | 86.1 |
| 2022 | 273W / 167L / 37D | 233W / 206L / 60D | 83.0 |
| 2021 | 231W / 151L / 57D | 232W / 167L / 43D | 84.4 |
| 2020 | 198W / 138L / 33D | 181W / 145L / 31D | 74.4 |
| 2019 | 377W / 278L / 78D | 361W / 296L / 81D | 78.2 |
| 2018 | 397W / 273L / 61D | 374W / 285L / 65D | 83.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 301 | 145 | 127 | 29 | 48.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 239 | 135 | 82 | 22 | 56.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 202 | 95 | 92 | 15 | 47.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 199 | 107 | 76 | 16 | 53.8% |
| Australian Defense | 156 | 78 | 63 | 15 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 146 | 80 | 53 | 13 | 54.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 134 | 64 | 57 | 13 | 47.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 129 | 60 | 52 | 17 | 46.5% |
| English Opening | 97 | 52 | 36 | 9 | 53.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 96 | 54 | 32 | 10 | 56.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 62 | 29 | 31 | 2 | 46.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 60 | 33 | 22 | 5 | 55.0% |
| Australian Defense | 55 | 25 | 26 | 4 | 45.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 55 | 26 | 25 | 4 | 47.3% |
| English Opening | 50 | 28 | 17 | 5 | 56.0% |
| Modern | 45 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 48.9% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 43 | 28 | 10 | 5 | 65.1% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 37 | 17 | 15 | 5 | 46.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 26 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 25 | 13 | 11 | 1 | 52.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Ruy Lopez | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation, Alapin Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 1 |