Agustin Nieto - FIDE Master and Blitz Dynamo
Known in the chess world by his username ASKA538, Agustin Nieto has steadily carved out his place on the 64 squares as a formidable FIDE Master. His journey started modestly with a blitz rating of 1174 back in 2018, but he quickly accelerated past casual club players and into the esteemed ranks of titled pros.
A Blitz Mastermind
Blitz is where Agustin truly shines. With a peak blitz rating soaring to 2463 by 2024, he combines swift calculation with a surprising amount of patience — averaging nearly 70 moves per win, proving he’s comfortable in long scrambles as well as sharp tactics. His win rate in blitz hovers just above 52%, a testament to both his consistency and relentless fighting spirit.
Bullet and Rapid
While blitz grabs the spotlight, Agustin's bullet games show an impressive 58.7% win rate, achieving a peak of 2325 rating. Rapid chess, perhaps a little less favored, still sees him maintain a solid 46.7% win rate, boosting his versatility across formats.
Known For Comebacks and Resilience
They say a true champion rises after a fall, and Agustin epitomizes this with an astonishing 85.9% comeback rate and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece — apparently, losing material just lights a fire under him. His tilt factor is a manageable 9, which means even when the games get rough, he’s more likely to plot a counterstrike than chuck the board.
Opening, Middle & Endgame
Secretive about his opening repertoire – or maybe just too good to reveal his tricks – Agustin’s playstyle is dominated by a hearty love for endgames, appearing in nearly 78% of his games. His opponents often find themselves outmaneuvered when the clock ticks down, a subtle reminder that he’s not just fast but deeply strategic.
Opponent Chronicles
Facing players like "korchmar_vasiliy" and "papaifael" has been a mixed bag, but Agustin’s record against various opponents often tilts heavily in his favor, including several perfect 100% win rates against many challengers. He’s not just grinding ratings; he’s crafting memorable rivalries and dazzling finishes.
Fun Facts & Quirks
- He kicks off the week on a high note – with an impressive 68% win rate on Mondays and a staggering 75% on Sundays!
- Agustin’s peak hours? Midday and early afternoon – 100% win rate between 12 PM and 19 PM, so maybe don’t challenge him before your morning coffee.
- Despite his tactical prowess, Agustin modestly resigns early only 0.62% of the time – he enjoys the fight too much to quit quickly.
In sum, Agustin Nieto is a relentless competitor, a tactical genius, and a blitz aficionado whose games are as thrilling as a rollercoaster ride – sharp turns, unexpected comebacks, and a finish line often crossed with a victorious grin.
Agustín, here’s a roadmap to climb beyond your current 2463 (2024-04-16) level
What you are already doing well
- Tactical Punch: Your Traxler game versus Evgeniy Khain shows confident calculation and a precise sense for initiative.
- Opening Ambition: You consistently pick combative systems (Morra, Benko, Modern, Traxler) that suit your dynamic style.
- Piece Activity Focus: Games like the Caro-Kann win vs hallvard haug flatebø demonstrate that you value rapid development and open lines—exactly what a strong blitz repertoire needs.
- Ability to Convert Winning Attacks: In multiple wins you kept the foot on the gas until mate or resignation, rarely letting the opponent escape once the initiative was yours.
Key areas to sharpen
- Clock Discipline
Two recent defeats (vs FoamySea and James Neal) were purely time related. You often invest a large chunk of your clock early, then scramble in technical phases. • Set a “soft limit” of no move over 15 s during the opening/early middlegame
• Train 1 | 0 bullet sessions to force instant instinct moves
• Finish every practice game with a 15-second “increment drill”: switch to an increment time control and practise moving while your clock is below 5 s. - End-game Clean-up
In the Trompowsky loss to Vasiliy Korchmar you reached an equal R+N vs R end-game but lacked a plan and collapsed. • Review basic lucena, philidor and N+Pawn techniques each week.
• Solve 3 composed practical rook-endgame studies daily. • When ahead, ask yourself “What is my cleanest path to exchange into a won end-game?” and play for that. - Structured Defence
Your Benko Gambit loss vs okolot shows a tendency to meet pressure with pawn thrusts (…b5, …e6) before pieces are coordinated. • Insert the question “What does the position need—defence or counter-attack?” before every sharp pawn push.
• Practise 10 defensive puzzles/session; focus on pawn-down positions so you get comfortable holding. - Opening Depth on Quiet Lines
Opponents who sidestep theory (e.g. 1.e3, 1.d3 Sicilian) earned comfortable middlegames against you. • Build a solid fallback answer for quiet systems (recommend: …d5 & …c5 vs Réti/English, and …e5 against 1.g3/1.Nf3). • Spend one study session per week updating your notes; in blitz you only need broad plans, not memorisation.
Practice checklist
- After every session, run a three-question review: (1) Why did I win/lose on the clock? (2) What was my biggest tactical oversight? (3) Did I choose the right end-game?
- Keep a mini-database of recurring mistakes tagged “time scramble”, “mis-coordination”, “premature pawn push”. Revisit them weekly.
- Balance your tactical training with 30 % defensive studies and 20 % end-game drills.
Progress tracking
Maintain the fighting spirit that already sets you apart, while tightening the nuts and bolts described above. Small improvements to clock handling, end-game technique and defensive patience should carry you well past the 2400 blitz barrier.
Good luck, and see you at the board!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| colombiano07 | 10W / 13L / 3D | |
| adi_tm1996 | 6W / 4L / 0D | |
| onlymajesticsnake | 3W / 0L / 1D | |
| Sandi Stojanovski | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| silvercityindigo | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2378 | |||
| 2024 | 2316 | 2381 | ||
| 2023 | 2249 | |||
| 2022 | 1938 | |||
| 2021 | 1859 | 1644 | ||
| 2020 | 1948 | |||
| 2018 | 1601 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 87.0 |
| 2024 | 179W / 123L / 16D | 147W / 155L / 13D | 74.2 |
| 2023 | 26W / 15L / 2D | 23W / 16L / 5D | 74.4 |
| 2022 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 25.0 |
| 2021 | 6W / 4L / 0D | 3W / 4L / 1D | 60.1 |
| 2020 | 3W / 0L / 1D | 1W / 0L / 1D | 69.5 |
| 2018 | 5W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 3L / 0D | 61.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 89 | 51 | 34 | 4 | 57.3% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 42 | 18 | 20 | 4 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 41 | 29 | 12 | 0 | 70.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 25 | 12 | 11 | 2 | 48.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 22 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 68.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 21 | 6 | 14 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 20 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Czech Defense | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 15 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 46.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Modern | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Evans Gambit Accepted, 5.c3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 8 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 4 |