Felix Hindermann - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Felix Hindermann is a chess virtuoso who proudly wears the title of FIDE Master, a testament to their strategic genius and countless hours spent under the spell of 64 squares. Known in the chess realm by their username ASVZ, Felix’s journey through the ranks is as thrilling as a well-executed queen sacrifice.
Since 2017, Felix has dazzled the chess world, especially in blitz and bullet formats where rapid-fire decisions reign supreme. Their bullet rating soared to an impressive peak of 2589 in 2023 — nearly as high as the pile of coffee cups next to their keyboard during marathon gaming sessions. Blitz rating? Even more electrifying, peaking at 2670 in 2023, where they convince opponents that every second counts, literally.
Felix's style could be described as a blend of patience and lightning intuition. With an average game length of about 75 moves per win, these matches are not your typical quick draws but battles where strategy meets endurance. A tough opponent to break, Felix boasts a White Win Rate of 52.81%, slightly edging out their Black Win Rate of 47.68%. The numbers tell us one thing: whether playing as White or Black, Felix is always in the fight.
But it's not all serious calculation and cold logic. Felix’s tactical awareness is almost poetic, featuring a spectacular 86.33% comeback rate when down, and a jaw-dropping 99.86% win rate after losing a piece. Apparently, losing material is just another challenge Felix redefines as an opportunity to crush their opponents.
With a tilt factor (even grandmasters have their bad days!) of just 13 and a mind sharp enough to avoid the infamous "one-sided losses" (a mere 2.82%), Felix keeps their nerves cooler than the other side of the pillow. Their longest winning streak? A solid 15 games — enough to make you wonder if they have a secret chess engine as a training partner.
Felix’s realm extends beyond rapid-fire duels, dabbling into daily games too, proving versatility and the joy of slow, thoughtful chess. The love for the game is evident in the sheer volume of games played — thousands across various formats — and a respectable positive win/loss record in every time control.
Off the board, Felix is a connoisseur of top-secret openings — a strategy that keeps opponents guessing and dazzled. It seems secrecy isn’t just for spies; it’s for champions like Felix who know that in chess, sometimes the best move is the one your opponent never sees coming.
Whether you’re a fan, a fellow competitor, or just a curious onlooker, Felix Hindermann’s chess saga is one of determination, creativity, and an occasional well-timed blunder (because who doesn't have those?). Buckle up for more moves, more games, and more spectacular battles to come from this FIDE Master!
Hi Felix, here’s a report on your recent games
What’s going well
- Tactical alertness. Your most-recent win (Alapin Sicilian) ended with the neat sequence 19.Rxd5 exd5 20.Nf5 … 21.Qxg7#. Spotting that …Qxg7 is impossible because the f5-knight guards g7 shows good calculation.
- Dynamic pawn levers on the flank. The h-pawn “hook” (h4–h5) features in four of your last six victories and frequently rips open kingside files for your bishops and rooks.
- Opening range. You handle both 1.e4 and 1.d4, reply to 1.e4 with French/…b6 systems, and as Black meet 1.d4 with Dutch ideas and early …Bb4 English-Defence setups. This makes you hard to prepare for.
- Peak strength. Congratulations on reaching 2670 (2023-05-28) recently!
Recurring issues
- Time management. Three of your last five losses were on time in equal or even better positions. Blitz feels fast, but try glancing at the clock every 2–3 moves. A simple mental cue—“move, clock, opponent, board”—can help.
- Drift in simplified endings. In the Torre Attack loss you reached a pleasant position (♖c1 + pressure vs. c-pawn) yet drifted after 25…f5–f4. Converting small advantages is mainly about king activity and avoid-the-weak-square principles—worth a study session.
- Over-committed pawn pushes. The Dutch game vs.
ThedoubleHshowed …f5/f4/f5 again, but the dark-square weaknesses on e5 & g5 became fatal. Review the concept of color_complex; sometimes restraining the f-pawn keeps your structure healthier. - Neglecting counterplay against passed pawns. In the English-Defense loss you allowed b6–b5–b4–b5! to roll down the board. When your opponent gets a b- or h-file runner, immediately decide: blockade, create a passed pawn elsewhere, or liquidate.
Action plan for the next two weeks
- Clock discipline drill. Play five 3|2 games where you force yourself to have ≥60 % of the starting time after move 15. Track progress in .
- Conversion practice. Load five winning but technical positions into an engine and play them out vs. the computer at depth-limited settings. Focus on king centralisation and pawn majority marches.
- “Healthy Dutch” playlist. Revisit classic games by Short & Malaniuk to see restrained …f5 structures—notice how they prepare …e5 first.
- Endgame book. Spend 15 min/day with Chapter 2 of Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual (on rook endings with a passed h-pawn) and test yourself with at least three studies.
- Sparring partner outreach. Challenge Alex King for a thematic rematch from move 20 of your last game; play it twice (once each side) and compare notes.
Quick reference of key ideas to review
- Weak color complexes color_complex
- Intermediate moves Zwischenzug
- Minor-piece endgames with outside passers
Keep track of progress
Check weekly; aim for a steady upward slope rather than streaky peaks.Good luck, Felix—keep the tactics sharp, manage the clock, and those 2300+ blitz points will turn into 2400 before long!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| umarov2005r | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| marks1420 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sentul_player15 | 2W / 4L / 0D | View |
| classicalplayer1111 | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| heathbrownn | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jhonathandh | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| yevhen_taranenko | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| aimlessphilosopher | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| nighthorses | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| tyush7 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gamayevoleg | 19W / 16L / 3D | View Games |
| Pavel Sevostianov | 15W / 20L / 2D | View Games |
| Anselm Wagner | 12W / 19L / 3D | View Games |
| asteroidanus | 19W / 10L / 0D | View Games |
| coffeecafe | 15W / 14L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2500 | 2505 | 1740 | |
| 2024 | 2414 | 2504 | ||
| 2023 | 2514 | 2450 | 2114 | |
| 2022 | 2290 | 2303 | ||
| 2021 | 2336 | 2302 | ||
| 2020 | 2309 | 2398 | ||
| 2019 | 2348 | 2346 | 1836 | |
| 2018 | 2409 | 2257 | 1828 | |
| 2017 | 1896 | 2346 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 951W / 815L / 150D | 852W / 926L / 141D | 79.5 |
| 2024 | 1037W / 738L / 121D | 945W / 806L / 140D | 77.7 |
| 2023 | 1050W / 949L / 149D | 954W / 1009L / 177D | 77.1 |
| 2022 | 758W / 561L / 92D | 681W / 621L / 90D | 74.9 |
| 2021 | 70W / 69L / 7D | 60W / 74L / 10D | 74.3 |
| 2020 | 193W / 178L / 33D | 189W / 191L / 23D | 79.3 |
| 2019 | 799W / 563L / 78D | 712W / 670L / 88D | 77.7 |
| 2018 | 445W / 310L / 47D | 376W / 375L / 39D | 73.8 |
| 2017 | 142W / 115L / 21D | 147W / 111L / 22D | 76.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 4062 | 2244 | 1619 | 199 | 55.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 1168 | 595 | 514 | 59 | 50.9% |
| Australian Defense | 925 | 468 | 406 | 51 | 50.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 498 | 222 | 239 | 37 | 44.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 479 | 239 | 206 | 34 | 49.9% |
| French Defense | 260 | 124 | 124 | 12 | 47.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 218 | 97 | 106 | 15 | 44.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 154 | 73 | 75 | 6 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 145 | 73 | 59 | 13 | 50.3% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 136 | 72 | 59 | 5 | 52.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1705 | 974 | 602 | 129 | 57.1% |
| Australian Defense | 948 | 415 | 439 | 94 | 43.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 812 | 343 | 389 | 80 | 42.2% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 608 | 303 | 248 | 57 | 49.8% |
| French Defense | 579 | 290 | 249 | 40 | 50.1% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 505 | 254 | 209 | 42 | 50.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 493 | 228 | 219 | 46 | 46.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 383 | 172 | 188 | 23 | 44.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 365 | 175 | 161 | 29 | 48.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 325 | 143 | 157 | 25 | 44.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |