Andreas Vogt (AVoogd) - FIDE Master & Chess Enthusiast
Meet Andreas Vogt, a cunning tactician who proudly carries the title of FIDE Master. Known in chess circles as AVoogd, Andreas is not just your average player – they’ve turned the art of the game into a fine balance of strategy, resilience, and occasional flair for dramatic comebacks.
With a peak blitz rating soaring above 2500 in 2020, Andreas once blitzed through opponents faster than a coffee break, showcasing a ruthless streak that included a jaw-dropping 13-win streak – a testament to their focused dominance on the board.
Despite the serious chops, Andreas’ style is refreshingly human thanks to a modest tilt factor of 4, proving even the best can get a little steamed when the knights don’t behave. Yet, true to a master’s spirit, their comeback rate sits near-perfect at over 90% and a flawless win rate after losing a piece. Talk about fighting spirit!
Andreas prefers to keep games lengthy and thoughtful, with an average of around 70 moves per game, proving patience truly is a virtue. Their love for the endgame shines through nearly 79% of the time – a stage where many players falter, but not our FM.
Playing Preferences & Quirks
- Opening repertoire: Mostly “Top Secret” (sounds mysterious enough to intimidate opponents before the first move!)
- Winning smile spots: Tops at noon and 5 PM – when tactical brilliance strikes just right
- Favorite days: Wednesday brings out peak performance, while Saturdays seem to be their well-deserved rest day
- Color advantage: White slightly edges out Black with a 57% win rate
Andreas' head-to-head stats reveal some amusing tales – a flawless 100% win rate against certain rivals and a handful who inexplicably manage to dodge defeat every time. It’s all part of the rich tapestry that makes AVoogd's chess journey one to watch.
Whether in rapid or blitz, at home or in the heat of competition, Andreas Vogt melds tenacity with cunning, ensuring every match is more than just a game – it’s a captivating story written move by move.
Andreas, here’s a focused review of your recent play
What you’re already doing well
- Dynamism in the center: In both your recent wins and losses you seize space with early ...d5 / ...dxc4 or d5 breaks. This keeps the initiative and often forces opponents to solve concrete problems.
- Piece activity & tactics: Tactical alertness is evident in combinations such as 27…Nxd4!! in your win vs zenosparadox. You spot intermediate moves and aren’t afraid to calculate complicated lines.
- Opening range: You comfortably handle Queen’s-Pawn structures as both colors and are not shy about flexible set-ups like the Benko or French. This variety makes you hard to prepare for.
Key improvement themes
1 – Time management (Zeitnot)
Three of the last five losses were on the clock while the position was playable. When you’re under 40 seconds, accuracy drops sharply (e.g. 32.Rcb1 & 33.Qh4?? vs Tonijo). Try:
- Adopt a “Bronstein buffer” – never dip below 20 sec per increment game unless you’re already winning.
- Use opening “pre-moves”: have go-to responses in familiar structures so early moves cost < 2 seconds each.
- Practice 1-minute “move-sprints” on harmless positions to train quick, safe moves.
2 – Defensive resourcefulness when worse
In the loss to Pestininkas123 a promising kingside pawn storm left your own king airy. When the attack fizzles, switch mindset from “attack” to “control”:
- Identify the opponent’s only active plan.
- Trade attacking pieces or create flight squares.
- Use the clock gain from forcing moves to rebuild.
3 – Endgame conversion
Even in victories, winning techniques can be cleaner. Review:
- Rook vs rook + passer endings – your game vs pale_horse_rider was convincing, but a faster path existed (36…Bxd1!+ earlier).
- Minor-piece endgames with asymmetrical pawns (e.g. knights vs bishops). Drill fundamental positions so you rely less on over-the-board calculation.
4 – Opening polish
You often meet 1.d4 with Queen’s Gambit-style structures, then transpose into Benoni/Benko set-ups. Two suggestions:
- Add a simple, solid line against the English (1.c4) – in the loss to michael124667 the early …e6/…d5 French set-up was fine but you drifted. Study 8…c5 ideas sooner to equalize.
- White side: after 1.d4 b5 (Polish) you grabbed space but didn’t punish Black’s pawn moves quickly. Have a prepared line with early a4 & c3, keeping the center closed until you can open with e4-e5.
Action plan for the next two weeks
- Daily puzzle rush (5 min) – sharpens tactical vision, especially under time pressure.
- Endgame drill (10 min) – rook endgames with pawns on both wings; aim for 10 examples/day.
- Opening flash cards (5 min) – choose one critical variation (e.g. Benko 8…c5 ideas) and memorise move order.
- Play two 3 + 2 games applying the 20-second buffer rule, annotate them, and note how often you respected it.
Your peak ratings
Blitz 2502 (2020-04-03) • Rapid 2408 (2020-03-27) • Bullet
Performance snapshots
For inspiration
Replay your crisp miniature against zenosparadox – focus on how early central tension turned into concrete tactics:
Keep combining your tactical eye with disciplined time use and you’ll break the next rating barrier soon. Good luck, and happy calculating!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| slim_fit | 2W / 12L / 5D | |
| Raoul Van Ketel | 4W / 1L / 6D | |
| pompie1973 | 1W / 5L / 2D | |
| robertstraver | 3W / 1L / 4D | |
| uittenbogaard | 8W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2226 | |||
| 2022 | 2255 | |||
| 2021 | 2174 | |||
| 2020 | 2276 | 2146 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0W / 1L / 1D | 1W / 0L / 1D | 94.5 |
| 2022 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 71.5 |
| 2021 | 7W / 3L / 1D | 5W / 5L / 1D | 75.7 |
| 2020 | 97W / 48L / 24D | 94W / 54L / 19D | 73.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 20 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 60.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 64.3% |
| French Defense | 13 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 30.8% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 40.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Döry Defense | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| French Defense | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Slav Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Guimard Variation, Thunderbunny Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 4 | 1 |