Gordon McNeill – The BabyFacedAssassin of the Chessboard
Known to many as the BabyFacedAssassin, Gordon McNeill is a National Master who has carved a unique path through the ranks of chess. Starting from modest ratings in 2016, Gordon steadily pushed boundaries, demonstrating resilience and tactical prowess that belies the nickname's innocent undertone.
Journey and Style
Gordon's journey has been anything but ordinary. With a penchant for bullet chess, Gordon boasts a maximum rating soaring above 2400—remarkable for such a fast-paced discipline. Their blitz and bullet performances showcase a player who thrives under pressure, capable of clever comebacks and near-perfect play after losing material.
An intriguing fact: Gordon's comeback rate stands at an astonishing 84%, and the win rate after losing a piece is nearly perfect at 99.8%. In other words, if you think you've rattled Gordon by stealing a piece, think again—they'll probably turn the tables on you faster than you can say "checkmate."
Favorite Openings and Notable Stats
A true mystery remains around Gordon’s go-to opening, shrouded under the codename "Top Secret," which has impressed massively across all formats—commanding win rates of over 50% in bullet and clobbering opponents at nearly 78% in rapid games. Whatever it is, it clearly works.
Playing Temperament
With a tilt factor of just 14, Gordon stays remarkably cool even when things heat up. Their longest winning streak? A stellar 14 games—long enough to send a shiver down the spine of any opponent. Gordon is also a strategic endgame guru, engaging deeply in over 72% of all finished games.
Personality and Impact
Off the board, Gordon's chess exploits could easily be mistaken for someone who moonlights as a mischievous prankster, but on the digital battlefield, they are a calculated predator. Facing some of the toughest foes, from gm_eric to tigernick, Gordon continues to hunt and pounce with steady aggression and surprising finesse.
Whether grinding through thousands of blitz games or blitzing bullet battles with surgical precision, Gordon McNeill is a force in the chess arena—one who proves that sometimes the most dangerous players come with the most innocent faces.
Blitz feedback for Gordon McNeill
You’ve shown solid practical play in blitz, with good momentum in the short term and a clear understanding of several solid opening structures. There are a few patterns to lean into and a few areas to tighten up so you can convert more opportunities into clean wins.
What you’re doing well
- Strong opening structure in reliable lines. You’re comfortable reaching playable middlegames from solid setups, which helps reduce early mistakes in blitz.
- Good practical sense in the middlegame. You tend to find workable plans that generate chances rather than getting stuck in overcomplicated positions.
- Consistent use of king safety and piece development. When you castle and develop efficiently, you keep practical pressure on your opponent and limit easy tactical blows against your king.
Key areas to improve
- Time management under pressure. In blitz, a calm, steady approach helps avoid last-second blunders. Practice a small “blunder check” routine in the final minutes of each game (scan for hanging pieces, forced captures, and checks before committing to a plan).
- Endgame conversion. When you emerge with a material edge, push to convert it cleanly. Work on simple rook endings and basic pawn endings so you finish advantages efficiently rather than letting them slip away under time pressure.
- Selective opening depth. Your openings performance shows you excel in a few solid systems. Deepen mastery of 2–3 openings you trust most, and settle variations you’re comfortable with to reduce decision fatigue in fast time controls.
- Pattern recognition training. Blitz rewards quick, accurate pattern recognition (tactics, motifs like forks, pins, skewers, and discovered attacks). Regular targeted puzzles will help you spot these without deep calculation every time.
Training plan for the next 4 weeks
- Week 1: Focus on 20–30 minute daily sessions. Do 15–20 tactical puzzles, emphasizing common blitz motifs (forks, pins, and discovered checks). Pair puzzles with 2 short blitz games to apply what you practiced.
- Week 2: Deepen 2 openings you use most in blitz (for example, the Scandinavian and another solid system). Create a short cheat sheet with key middlegame plans and typical counterplay by Black or White.
- Week 3: Endgame basics. Practice 2–3 simple endings (rook vs rook with pawns, knight vs pawns endgames) using quick drills or short sparring sessions to reinforce conversion technique.
- Week 4: Review and reflect. After each game, write down 1–3 critical turning points and what you would do differently. Share a concise summary with yourself to reinforce learning.
Openings focus
Your openings performance shows you do well in a few steady, principled setups. Consider leaning into:
- Scandinavian Defense (Center-focused, clear development, easier to navigate middlegame plans)
- Barnes Defense (solid, less theory-heavy, good practical chances in blitz)
Progress check (qualitative)
- Short-term momentum is positive, suggesting your recent decisions and play are finding better rhythm in fast games.
- Longer-term trends indicate there’s room to stabilise and improve consistency, especially in creating and finishing advantages under time pressure.
- The goal is steady improvement rather than chasing sharp, risky lines in blitz. Build a reliable, repeatable process you can trust in the last few minutes of each game.
Notes on next steps
Keep focusing on a tight opening repertoire, tighten the endgame conversion, and maintain consistent post-game reviews to identify recurring blunders or questionable decisions. If you’d like, I can tailor a 2-week workbook with specific puzzles, a 2-opening cheat sheet, and a short endgame drill routine aligned to your current play style.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| reykjavik_06 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| anabraxis | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| archetype_64 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| leruboost | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| nastychesszz | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Santiago Castillo | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| willsidney | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| nocturnus_xiii | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| veteran57 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ramontxu1414 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| GM_Eric | 72W / 43L / 18D | View Games |
| tigernick | 30W / 72L / 14D | View Games |
| bobaforcha | 25W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
| stallionamin | 25W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
| carsonmcneill | 27W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2326 | 2412 | 2056 | |
| 2024 | 2279 | 2188 | 2056 | 2244 |
| 2023 | 2373 | 2262 | 2227 | |
| 2022 | 2357 | 2289 | 2056 | 2225 |
| 2021 | 2291 | 2209 | 2056 | 2147 |
| 2020 | 2291 | 2348 | 1704 | 2058 |
| 2019 | 1950 | 2242 | 1876 | |
| 2018 | 2014 | 2076 | 1764 | |
| 2017 | 1994 | 1876 | 1704 | 1633 |
| 2016 | 1926 | 1956 | 1613 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 507W / 374L / 51D | 447W / 423L / 57D | 76.7 |
| 2024 | 237W / 167L / 27D | 208W / 198L / 29D | 77.1 |
| 2023 | 245W / 189L / 40D | 238W / 203L / 35D | 77.9 |
| 2022 | 215W / 152L / 33D | 188W / 190L / 31D | 75.1 |
| 2021 | 361W / 262L / 42D | 334W / 284L / 40D | 71.5 |
| 2020 | 471W / 400L / 88D | 472W / 406L / 67D | 70.5 |
| 2019 | 343W / 277L / 40D | 289W / 314L / 46D | 71.1 |
| 2018 | 641W / 477L / 89D | 592W / 537L / 96D | 72.7 |
| 2017 | 520W / 401L / 58D | 478W / 440L / 60D | 72.0 |
| 2016 | 184W / 134L / 22D | 188W / 142L / 17D | 72.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 719 | 382 | 281 | 56 | 53.1% |
| Czech Defense | 431 | 222 | 184 | 25 | 51.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 400 | 201 | 156 | 43 | 50.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 335 | 173 | 140 | 22 | 51.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 329 | 177 | 131 | 21 | 53.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 313 | 146 | 142 | 25 | 46.6% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 279 | 136 | 128 | 15 | 48.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 273 | 156 | 99 | 18 | 57.1% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 233 | 117 | 98 | 18 | 50.2% |
| Philidor Defense | 227 | 100 | 116 | 11 | 44.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 47 | 32 | 13 | 2 | 68.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 30 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Czech Defense | 20 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 75.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 19 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 79.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 19 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 79.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 17 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 76.5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 81.2% |
| Bird Opening | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 76.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 197 | 96 | 89 | 12 | 48.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 121 | 60 | 54 | 7 | 49.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 117 | 74 | 39 | 4 | 63.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 108 | 52 | 49 | 7 | 48.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 99 | 56 | 40 | 3 | 56.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 97 | 53 | 41 | 3 | 54.6% |
| Czech Defense | 90 | 45 | 37 | 8 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 86 | 42 | 40 | 4 | 48.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 77 | 41 | 33 | 3 | 53.2% |
| Modern | 53 | 27 | 24 | 2 | 50.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Evans Gambit: 5...Ba5 6.d4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |