Malcolm Stephens - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Malcolm Stephens, known in the chess world as bafmas, proudly carries the title of FIDE Master. A fierce competitor with a penchant for intense battles on the 64 squares, Malcolm has consistently demonstrated both tactical brilliance and psychological resilience.
Playing Style & Strengths
With an early resignation rate of only 7%, Malcolm shows the heart of a lion and rarely gives up early, even in the toughest situations. Their dedication to the endgame is remarkable, boasting an endgame frequency of over 80%, proving that Malcolm lives for those nail-biting finales where every move counts.
Fun fact: Malcolm's average game length reflects a patient and strategic mindset—winning games in about 69 moves on average, but sticking around for even longer in defeats (around 76 moves), possibly hoping opponents lose their nerves first.
Tactical Awareness
Ever the phoenix, Malcolm has an inspiring comeback rate close to 87% and a 100% win rate after losing a piece—clearly, a player not to be underestimated! Their ability to turn the tides makes every game a thriller.
Ratings & Performance
- Blitz: Peaked at an impressive 2346 rating in 2023, staying consistently above 2200.
- Bullet: Demonstrates dynamic play with a peak rating of 2274 in 2023.
- Rapid: Reaching as high as 2327 in 2022, Malcolm proves versatility across time controls.
Across multiple years, Malcolm has maintained a strong presence, especially in blitz and bullet, winning more than half of the games with their favored Top Secret opening, winning around 53% to 56% of such encounters.
Psychological Strengths & Patterns
Tilt factor of 7 might suggest Malcolm has some fiery moments—perhaps a friendly reminder to stretch those fingers or take a breather between games. Despite that, their psychological toughness still shines through, evidenced by strong win rates and solid performance throughout the week.
Opponent Dynamics & Signature Rivalries
Malcolm has faced some opponents multiple times, including statsmasternz and mardon, with mixed results, showcasing that every rivalry has its ups and downs. Interestingly, they’ve achieved perfect winning records (100%) against quite a few adversaries, including lavasanix and pytell, often leaving opponents wondering what just happened.
A Day in the Life
Saturdays and Fridays seem to be Malcolm's lucky days with win rates soaring above 55% and 61%, respectively. Whether it’s the weekend spirit or just a well-oiled preparation routine, opponents beware—Malcolm is particularly sharp during these times.
In Conclusion
With a blend of tactical mastery, strong endgame skills, and a streaky but resilient temperament, Malcolm Stephens (aka bafmas) is a player who never stops fighting and always keeps the chess community entertained. Expect unexpected comebacks, complicated endgames, and maybe a cheeky blunder here and there—after all, even FIDE Masters are human.
Constructive Feedback for Malcolm Stephens
Your Current Profile
• Peak Blitz rating so far: 2346 (2023-09-07)
• Activity snapshots:
What You’re Already Doing Well
- Opening variety & ambition – You handle both 1.e4 and 1.Nf3 / English setups, and as Black you meet them with flexible Sicilian (Rossolimo/Nyezhmetdinov) lines and solid French/Queen’s-Pawn structures. This keeps opponents out of book and gives you fighting chances.
- Tactical alertness – In several wins you found resourceful shots such as 18… Nxf4 against aanshbhargava and 31… Nh3⁺ against aanshbhargava. Your eyes are open for forks, pins and zwischenzug ideas.
- Playing for the initiative – You rarely shy away from pawn breaks (…f6/…f5, g-pawn storms) and are willing to give material to keep pressure, a valuable skill once paired with consistent calculation.
Main Improvement Themes
-
Time Management
Over half of your recent losses were by flagging in roughly balanced or even winning positions. Treat the clock as a piece:- Aim to have >60 % of starting time after move 10, and at least 20–30 s in blitz endgames.
- When the position is quiet, spend max 10 s; save the deep think for critical branches.
- Include 3-min “no-increment” games in training to force concise decision making.
-
Over-extension of flank pawns
Early g4/h4 advances (e.g. loss vs bivaly007, win vs dragoldfraj) often leave dark-square holes and cost tempo. Before pushing a wing pawn, ask: “Do I benefit if my opponent ignores this move?” If not, reconsider. -
Central & minor-piece coordination
Several defeats featured Knights pushed to the rim or Bishops traded without a plan, after which you were left with loose centers (see loss vs tashkent2026). Work on keeping pieces harmonised before launching pawn breaks. -
Conversion technique
You reach winning positions but sometimes miss clean finishes, allowing counterplay or running out of time. Practise technical endgames (R+P vs R, minor-piece endgames) and simplification when ahead.
Key Moment Illustrations
Good tactical eye:
Costly time-trouble blunder:
Action Plan
| Time Frame | Focus | Practical Tasks |
|---|---|---|
| Next 2 weeks | Clock discipline Tactics refresh |
• Play daily 10 + 0 pools, resign hopeless games instead of flagging. • 30 minutes/day on mixed tactical sets (1200–2000). • Annotate openings: note one improvement for each game. |
| 1-2 months | Endgame technique |
• Work through 50 endings from Silman’s Complete Endgame Course. • Play training games starting from R+P vs R and B vs N structures. |
| 3+ months | Opening depth & strategic patterns |
• Build a trimmed repertoire: Rossolimo / French as Black, English & 1.e4 as White. • Create flashcards of tabiya plans: pawn structures, typical piece squares. |
Mindset Reminders
- “Finish development before fireworks” – 4 developed pieces is a good benchmark.
- “Convert, don’t collect” – Once a pawn up, trade pieces not time.
- Review each loss within 24 h; tag whether it was a blunder, clock, or strategic error.
Keep enjoying the fight, Malcolm – refine these areas and you’ll soon push past your current peak!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ashwink26 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| malibubj | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| tygra8 | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| froggymate23 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| chimeramyth2240 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| reynaldiaz | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| benjaamedina | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| chessrepossess | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| aybareon | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| chetanmutagekar | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mardon | 5W / 5L / 1D | |
| statsmasternz | 3W / 7L / 1D | |
| andrew0915 | 6W / 3L / 1D | |
| Mil Vuk | 5W / 4L / 1D | |
| zaid112 | 7W / 3L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2086 | 2245 | ||
| 2024 | 2037 | 2244 | 2246 | |
| 2023 | 2031 | 2293 | 2223 | |
| 2022 | 2257 | 2327 | ||
| 2021 | 2218 | 2272 | ||
| 2020 | 2259 | 1871 | ||
| 2019 | 1949 | 2248 | ||
| 2018 | 2020 | 2150 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 75W / 54L / 10D | 75W / 57L / 7D | 72.6 |
| 2024 | 133W / 96L / 7D | 120W / 104L / 11D | 75.7 |
| 2023 | 224W / 152L / 20D | 196W / 161L / 21D | 71.4 |
| 2022 | 163W / 100L / 18D | 140W / 113L / 28D | 74.6 |
| 2021 | 128W / 90L / 25D | 130W / 93L / 24D | 76.1 |
| 2020 | 125W / 70L / 23D | 93W / 96L / 21D | 73.1 |
| 2019 | 137W / 86L / 17D | 119W / 91L / 21D | 76.6 |
| 2018 | 22W / 17L / 2D | 29W / 10L / 3D | 68.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 38 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 36 | 23 | 13 | 0 | 63.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 35 | 23 | 11 | 1 | 65.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 31 | 18 | 13 | 0 | 58.1% |
| English Opening | 29 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 62.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 28 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 60.7% |
| Dutch Defense | 28 | 15 | 12 | 1 | 53.6% |
| French Defense | 26 | 11 | 14 | 1 | 42.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 25 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 64.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 24 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 70.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 89 | 54 | 29 | 6 | 60.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 83 | 37 | 33 | 13 | 44.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 77 | 34 | 37 | 6 | 44.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 71 | 44 | 23 | 4 | 62.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 64 | 30 | 26 | 8 | 46.9% |
| English Opening | 58 | 27 | 25 | 6 | 46.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 58 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 63.8% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 57 | 32 | 20 | 5 | 56.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 56 | 29 | 21 | 6 | 51.8% |
| French Defense | 55 | 29 | 24 | 2 | 52.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| French Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 5 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |