Samer Alwalid: The Endgame Enthusiast
Meet Samer Alwalid, known on the digital battlefield as bashsamer. Though his journey through the realms of chess ratings might be more like a rollercoaster DNA strand than a straight line, Samer pokes and prods the chessboard with the curiosity and resilience of a true biological experiment.
In the rapid-fire world of Bullet chess, Samer's rating has fluctuated from a high of 379 to a humble 173 in 2023. While his win count might look like a low cell division rate with only 1 win out of 17 games, his rapid format shows a livelier genetic code, with an average rating around 566 and 4 wins out of 15 battles in 2022.
Opening repertoire? Samer’s preferred genetic markers include several variations of the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack and the Modern Defense, though his victories tend to come from some rare but mighty mutations like the Saragossa Opening in bullet, and the French Defense Kings Indian Attack and Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack Modern Variation in rapid, each boasting a perfect 100% win rate when played!
Samer’s tactical awareness reveals that he’s quite the comeback organism, bouncing back in 60% of tricky situations and winning 100% of the times after losing a piece. Talk about survival of the fittest!
When it comes to psychology, he’s got a tilt factor of 16, showing he’s human enough to feel the sting of defeat but persistent enough to keep evolving. His average moves per win (about 57) indicate that when Samer makes it through the opening and midgame, he enjoys a good long endgame – roughly 25% of his matches – proving that he’s not afraid to get down to business in the cellular-level intricacies of piece placement.
Whether it’s 1 PM with a 40% win rate or the perfect conditions of Thursday where he’s recorded 100% wins, it seems that Samer’s chess bio rhythm adapts with remarkable variability. Opponents beware: playing against bashsamer might just feel like trying to combat a clever organism thriving on tactical regeneration.
In the grand experiment of chess, Samer Alwalid proves that even a humble rating history can tell a fascinating story of resilience, biology-inspired strategy, and a love for the game that keeps evolving—one move at a time. Checkmate to predictability!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| albashahad | 5W / 27L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 173 | |||
| 2022 | 566 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1W / 8L / 0D | 0W / 8L / 0D | 38.1 |
| 2022 | 3W / 5L / 0D | 1W / 6L / 0D | 51.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense with | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack Modern Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Reti Opening Kingside Fianchetto Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Saragossa Opening | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Torre Attack Fianchetto Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Reti Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Kings Fianchetto Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense Gurgenidze Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Kings Pawn Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van t Kruijs Opening | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense with | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack Modern Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Kings Fianchetto Opening Symmetrical Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense Kings Indian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Grob Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bishops Opening Boi Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro Kann Defense Advance Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Kings Gambit Accepted | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 1 | 1 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |