Petar Benkovic: The International Master of Mystery and Moves
Meet Petar Benkovic, known in the chess realms as benko_008, a cunning International Master whose games are as captivating as a well-brewed cup of coffee on a Monday morning. Starting from humble beginnings in 2017 with a blitz rating stuck at 1200, Petar executed a rapid ascent up the ranks faster than you can say "checkmate," smashing barriers to soar beyond 2480 in blitz by 2024.
Petar’s playing style is a delightful mix of endurance and brilliance, boasting an incredible comeback rate of over 91%—because losing pieces just means a new opportunity to keep opponents on their toes. In fact, after losing a piece, Petar’s win rate is a perfect 100%, proving that setbacks only fuel his tactical genius. With an average game length nudging close to 78 moves for wins, this player prefers an epic battle full of twists and turns rather than a quick, quiet surrender.
When it comes to openings, Petar prefers the secret sauce—aptly labeled "Top Secret"—dominating over 600 blitz games with a winning rate north of 60%. The same strategy applies to rapid and bullet formats too, making opponents sweat over the mystery of what move comes next.
Off the board, Petar enjoys demolishing foes consistently, with a total blitz record boasting 370 wins against 173 losses and 66 draws. Against some familiar rivals like cy_alt1 and a_fat_penguin, he flaunts win rates approaching 90% or better — it's clear these are not friendly sparring partners!
Psychologically, Petar has a modest tilt factor of 11, so expect the occasional surprised face, but nothing that breaks the relentless focus. Fun fact: Petar’s best playing hours are around noon and early afternoon, unlocking win rates as high as 84%. So if you ever want to challenge benko_008, maybe avoid lunch time!
Whether it's rapid-fire blitz or thoughtful daily games, Petar Benkovic blends resilience, mystery, and a dash of humor into the art of chess. Watch out world, this IM isn't just playing the game — he's rewriting the playbook.
Hi Petar!
Congratulations on maintaining a strong online rapid rating of 2341 (2025-05-29). Your recent games show a creative, tactical style that frequently overwhelms opponents rated 200-300 points lower. Below is a concise, three-part report that should help you convert more of those advantages against peers and higher-rated players.
1. What you’re already doing well
- Opening variety & initiative. You employ the Sicilian, Semi-Slav, Caro-Kann and 1.Nf3 English/Retí setups with confidence. In the win vs. a_fat_sheep (05 Jun 2025) you seized the centre with …d5 in the Alapin and never looked back.
- Calculating forcing lines. Your combination 25…Kg7 26…c4 → 37…c1=Q+ in the same game is an excellent illustration. See the miniature clip: .
- Tactical awareness under pressure. Moves such as 32.Qxg8+!! in your Semi-Slav crush illustrate you can spot resourceful shots even with <90 seconds on the clock.
2. Recurring issues to address
- Clock management. Four of the five losses supplied were on time in equal or winning positions (e.g. vs. Caio_Buys & delphin11). Good practical players rarely fall below 20 % of the starting time without a clear plan. See tip set below.
- End-game conversion. In the French loss (Sept 2024) a rook + two passed pawns should never lose. Your technique with rook + pawns vs. rook looked shaky in several examples; study classical models (Capablanca, Rubinstein) and drill conversion exercises.
- Prophylaxis & counterplay. Several defeats stemmed from ignoring opponent plans:
- French Tarrasch: after 19…Qe4?! your queen became misplaced; White seized the initiative with Bd3–e4.
- English vs. Caio_Buys: queenside expansion with 28…d4! eventually rolled you up—your own passer on b7 arrived one tempo too late.
3. Action plan (next 4–6 weeks)
- Refine openings—narrow the repertoire.
- Black vs. 1.e4 – choose one between French and Sicilian for rapid play. Deepen the line instead of juggling both.
- Against 1.d4 stick to Semi-Slav; memorise the critical Meran tabiyas to move 15 so you reach the middlegame with an extra 1-2 minutes.
- Clock discipline routine.
- Use a “2-minute checkpoint”: if you are under 2 minutes with >10 moves to reach increment phase, force yourself to move within 10 seconds until increment stabilises.
- Practise 5-minute no-increment blitz exclusively for one week to train fast decision making under pressure.
- End-game drills.
- Daily 15-minute session on rook endings (Lichess studies or a physical board). Focus on Lucena, Philidor & “rook behind passed pawn” ideas.
- Add 10 puzzles featuring Opposite-Colored Bishops and technical wins.
- Game review habit.
- After each session pick one critical moment and write a single sentence: “What was the opponent’s threat?”—this reinforces Prophylaxis.
- Log results with the built-in stats tool; your personal heatmap (, ) already indicates score drops after the 3-hour mark—schedule tougher games earlier.
Motivational snapshot
Your tactical imagination is easily top-2300 level; pairing it with sturdier technique and better clock handling should push you comfortably into 2400-plus territory this season. Stay curious, keep analysing, and let’s aim to turn every passed pawn into a queen, not a time-scramble. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| a_fat_sheep | 26W / 2L / 2D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chiaochiao | 165W / 17L / 55D | |
| Yağız Gallevci | 72W / 35L / 22D | |
| leteos01 | 28W / 19L / 2D | |
| Chaoruo Cai | 16W / 10L / 19D | |
| a_fat_sheep | 26W / 2L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2483 | 2341 | ||
| 2024 | 2483 | 2339 | ||
| 2023 | 2483 | 2339 | 1513 | |
| 2022 | 2414 | 2415 | 2339 | 1380 |
| 2021 | 2261 | 2449 | 2309 | 1200 |
| 2020 | 2180 | 2408 | 2268 | |
| 2019 | 2107 | 2388 | 1942 | |
| 2018 | 1424 | 2370 | 1962 | 1200 |
| 2017 | 1200 | 1637 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19W / 1L / 4D | 13W / 0L / 1D | 79.5 |
| 2024 | 11W / 0L / 0D | 16W / 1L / 2D | 84.1 |
| 2023 | 21W / 3L / 2D | 18W / 7L / 5D | 81.6 |
| 2022 | 53W / 11L / 12D | 20W / 14L / 6D | 83.8 |
| 2021 | 37W / 13L / 8D | 28W / 19L / 6D | 82.6 |
| 2020 | 88W / 31L / 29D | 95W / 35L / 30D | 83.4 |
| 2019 | 91W / 32L / 31D | 62W / 23L / 32D | 80.1 |
| 2018 | 90W / 32L / 28D | 90W / 41L / 20D | 80.3 |
| 2017 | 8W / 0L / 2D | 4W / 2L / 2D | 74.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 25 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 76.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 20 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 70.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 20 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 55.0% |
| Scotch Game | 18 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 72.2% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 17 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 47.1% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 17 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 35.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 17 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 35.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 17 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 58.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 16 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 15 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 73.3% |
| Döry Defense | 15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 46.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 15 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 46.7% |
| Slav Defense | 14 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 71.4% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 14 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 64.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 14 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 64.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Orthodox, 7.Rc1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 6.Nf3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Unknown Opening* | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Keres Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |