Irakli Beradze - International Master and Bullet Blitz Virtuoso
Meet Irakli Beradze, an International Master from the world of chess, who dances nimbly across the 64 squares with the swiftness of a bullet train and the precision of a grandmaster surgeon. Known online by the username beradze, he’s been a formidable force in Bullet and Blitz formats since 2017, punching well above his rating with a peak Bullet rating soaring up to an astonishing 2891 in 2024!
Starting from humble beginnings with a Bullet rating of 1370 in 2017, Irakli rapidly catapulted his way to nearly 2900 eight years later – talk about a serious glow-up! His Blitz game is just as impressive, consistently hovering around 2700 to 2800 rating points, making casual opponents tremble before his lightning-fast tactics.
Not one to shy away from a challenge, Beradze’s win rates reveal a carefully honed balance of aggression and psychological endurance. With an extraordinary come back rate of 86.46% and a near-perfect win rate after losing a piece at 99.04%, this player knows how to turn disaster into dazzling victory – the true mark of a chess magician.
When it comes to openings, Beradze keeps his cards close to his chest — his secrets have yielded over 1800 wins in Bullet from more than 3400 games, boasting a commendable win rate just over 54%. In Blitz, his secret sauce brews even stronger, with a 55.6% win rate across 1800+ games.
If you ever spot an opponent with the username manudavid2910 or pancakes_with_cream, be warned – Beradze holds impressive win rates of 64% and 73% respectively against them. And if you’re lucky enough to face him during the mystical hours of 4am, watch out — that's his golden hour with a win rate nearing 74%! Clearly, Beradze is a night owl whose chess prowess reaches zenith in the twilight.
Off the board? Probably plotting the best checkmate while sipping strong Georgian coffee. On the board? Prepare for tactical fireworks, relentless endgames (he plays on average 75 moves before winning), and a streak of consistency that once peaked at a glorious 37 consecutive wins.
In short, Irakli Beradze is not merely playing chess; he’s rewriting bullet and blitz history one rapid, lightning-fast move at a time. Challengers beware: facing Beradze is a test of speed, strategy, and stamina – lose focus for a second, and it’s checkmate!
Hi Irakli, here is your personalised post-match report
Overall you are playing dynamic, initiative-driven chess and your current form is close to your personal best 2535 (2022-11-13). Below you will find a structured breakdown of your recent games, followed by an actionable study plan.
What’s already working
- Active piece play in the English / Neo-Catalan set-ups. In the win against Jason Cao you used the a-pawn advance (11.a4 & 12.a5) and the exchange sacrifice 16.Rxc5! to seize the initiative and never looked back.
- Tactical alertness once the position opens. Your queen manoeuvre 22.Qxf6!–23.Ng5! created dual threats that forced a decisive simplification.
- Endgame conversion skills. In several rapid games you converted extra pawns smoothly, often by centralising the king early.
Quick wins (things you can fix this week)
- Time-management in faster pools. Both recent 60-second losses ended with 20–30 seconds still on your clock when the position was collapsing. Train short “touch-move” drills to cut the average decision time per move.
- Opening discipline against off-beat Caro-Kann/Sicilian lines. In the bullet loss to Amincheraghi99 you accepted an early knight-side pawn with 3.Bxa6? without development. A simple 3.Nc3 or 3.d4 would avoid the whole Qa5+ idea.
- King safety in opposite-side castling positions. Several defeats featured an exposed king after premature pawn pushes (e.g. 21.c4?! in the rapid loss to ManuDavid2910).
Deeper study plan (4-week block)
- Repair your Black repertoire vs 1.e4 Decide between a main-line Caro-Kann or a solid Sicilian Taimanov. Build a light notebook of tabia + 2 model games per line.
- Middlegame themes • Outposts on c5/e5 (English) • Exchange sacrifices on c5/c6 (as in your win) • Prophylaxis – ask “What can my opponent do next?” every move for 5 practice games.
- Endgames Spend 15 minutes daily on rook-and-pawn vs rook drills. You reach these endings often and a 5-move improvement is worth dozens of rating points.
- Practical training • 3 rapid games per day with post-game notes (no engine for 15 minutes). • 20 bullet games per week strictly to practise pre-move patterns and clock handling.
Instructive moment to replay
The following mini-PGN shows why 3.Bxa6? is risky and how Black punishes it:
[[Pgn|" 1.e4 c6 2.d4 Na6 3.Bxa6? Qa5+ 4.Nc3 Qxa6 5.Nge2 d6 6.O-O e5 7.Be3 Nf6 8.dxe5 dxe5 9.Bg5 Be7 10.Ng3 O-O —/+" ]]Activity snapshot
When you’re playing (and winning!) most often:
Next milestone
If you implement just the “Quick wins” section you should be able to stabilise above your current peak within 30–40 games. Keep notes, review them weekly, and celebrate small improvements.
Good luck with your training, Coach Bot
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| fianchesstovietnam | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Kostya Kavutskiy | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| José Carlos Ibarra Jerez | 1W / 4L / 0D | |
| kolver | 3W / 0L / 1D | |
| nursultan1990 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Jose Guilherme Barria Santos | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| wayo7 | 19W / 0L / 1D | |
| wsygt11111 | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ANA SHAMATAVA | 64W / 10L / 6D | |
| ... .... | 39W / 26L / 4D | |
| Grigoriy Oparin | 25W / 36L / 4D | |
| Luka Paichadze | 21W / 31L / 7D | |
| sandro_tsitsishvili | 56W / 3L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2796 | 2731 | 2480 | 1838 |
| 2024 | 2864 | 2750 | 1834 | |
| 2023 | 2692 | 2668 | 2447 | 1755 |
| 2022 | 2637 | 2639 | 2411 | 1543 |
| 2021 | 2733 | 2431 | ||
| 2020 | 2567 | 2733 | ||
| 2019 | 2666 | 2648 | 1684 | 1414 |
| 2018 | 2636 | 2713 | 1741 | 800 |
| 2017 | 2639 | 2493 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29W / 27L / 5D | 27W / 30L / 7D | 85.5 |
| 2024 | 93W / 55L / 12D | 84W / 71L / 6D | 84.3 |
| 2023 | 237W / 109L / 29D | 228W / 126L / 31D | 80.5 |
| 2022 | 76W / 30L / 8D | 74W / 32L / 9D | 79.3 |
| 2021 | 5W / 0L / 1D | 5W / 2L / 1D | 73.1 |
| 2020 | 104W / 47L / 7D | 106W / 52L / 4D | 69.3 |
| 2019 | 372W / 288L / 36D | 337W / 319L / 29D | 82.6 |
| 2018 | 199W / 138L / 27D | 165W / 178L / 17D | 78.1 |
| 2017 | 423W / 307L / 33D | 373W / 335L / 33D | 80.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 74 | 31 | 42 | 1 | 41.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 74 | 45 | 23 | 6 | 60.8% |
| Four Knights Game | 67 | 43 | 19 | 5 | 64.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 65 | 41 | 20 | 4 | 63.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 51 | 25 | 20 | 6 | 49.0% |
| Unknown | 49 | 28 | 21 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 45 | 21 | 21 | 3 | 46.7% |
| Petrov's Defense | 40 | 30 | 8 | 2 | 75.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 39 | 21 | 17 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 36 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 149 | 85 | 58 | 6 | 57.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 141 | 84 | 45 | 12 | 59.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 128 | 66 | 54 | 8 | 51.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 111 | 66 | 40 | 5 | 59.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 106 | 60 | 42 | 4 | 56.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 105 | 41 | 56 | 8 | 39.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 96 | 43 | 47 | 6 | 44.8% |
| Modern | 96 | 61 | 30 | 5 | 63.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 93 | 50 | 39 | 4 | 53.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 93 | 55 | 35 | 3 | 59.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Knights Game | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Paulsen Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Four Knights Game | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Bogoljubow Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 37 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |