Big_Finky: The National Master of Chess.com
Title: National Master
Big_Finky is not your everyday chess player — oh no, they're a National Master, a badge of honor earned through blood, sweat, and countless hours of pawns moving awkwardly yet purposefully over the board.
Rating Rollercoaster
Starting from modest beginnings around a Blitz rating of 1493 in late 2018, Big_Finky took the chess world by storm, climbing up to a peak Blitz rating of 2642 in August 2022 — impressive, right? Not just a one-trick pony, Big_Finky also conquered Bullet with a peak of 2501 and Rapid with a smashing 2401 rating achieved just recently in October 2024.
Playing Style & Personality
Known for their love of the endgame (showing up in nearly 70% of their games) and resilience with an 80% comeback rate after losing a piece, Big_Finky balances bright tactical fireworks with deep, slow-burning strategic battles. Their matches often last over 60 moves when they're winning, proving patience is truly a virtue.
They are also prone to some healthy tilt — with a tilt factor of 28, even the best players have their moments. But when the clock strikes 1 PM, Big_Finky is firing on all cylinders, with their best performance around lunchtime — who knew chess and sandwiches paired so well?
Signature Openings & Favorite Moves
Big_Finky’s secret weapon lies in "Top Secret" openings that no opponent can quite crack, spanning over 20,000 games. They also have a soft spot for the Slav Defense and Benoni Defense with near perfect win rates in some less traveled lines — because why follow the crowd when you can dance through the shadows?
Recent Battles
In an epic battle of wits just last June 1, 2025, Big_Finky elegantly handled the Slav Defense Modern Geller Gambit, forcing their opponent to resign after a calculated series of moves that looked suspiciously like chess magic.
Of course, not every day is a victory march. Just a day earlier, Big_Finky tasted defeat by time against an opponent named Evergreen_Elephant — proving that even top players can't escape the ticking clock!
Stats That Impress
- Blitz Games Played: over 20,000
- Overall Blitz Win Rate: almost 47%
- Rapid Win Rate: nearly 55%
- Bullet: a fast-paced frenzy with respectable nearly 47% wins
- Daily Chess: Humans don't stand a chance with a 95% win rate
- Longest Winning Streak: A dazzling 20 games in a row
- Current Winning Streak: A confident 4 games
Big_Finky’s Chess Philosophy
Whether calmly outmaneuvering an opponent in a marathon endgame or blitzing out a checkmate before their coffee’s even cold, Big_Finky plays chess like a grand story unfolding on 64 squares with a touch of humor and a lot of grit. Remember: every lost pawn might be a sneaky trap, and every win is just a warm-up for the next challenge!
Feedback Report for Big_Finky
Your current trajectory
Your overall results continue to trend upward (see
and ). With a personal best of 2642 (2022-08-04) you are already operating at a strong level, but there is still low-hanging fruit that can convert a few of those near-misses into wins.What you are doing well
- Dynamic tactical vision. The win against bromberg_striker67 shows crisp calculation. After 19.Nxd6! you exploited the pin on the d-file and never let go of the initiative:
- Practical creativity. You are comfortable steering the game into unorthodox structures (Englund Gambit as White, a3/b4 ideas, etc.), which often knocks opponents off book in bullet/blitz time controls.
- Converting material advantages. In the Slav win vs devilshell1, once you reached the extra exchange you simplified methodically and mated with only nine seconds left—good balance between speed and accuracy.
Key areas to focus on next
1. Early pawn pushes that invite counterplay
Games such as the loss to khachikyan-hayko (1.a3, 2.b4) and the Danish Gambit time-forfeit show that side-pawn adventures can leave your king stuck in the centre or cede the dark-squares. In fast time controls it is safer to delay flank expansions until you have completed minor-piece development.
2. Clock management
- You lost two games on time from roughly equal positions. Try allocating a “soft cap” of 10 seconds per move until move 20, then speed-up once the position clarifies.
- When clearly winning, simplify first, then premove the obvious recaptures—this kept you alive vs wander1ust8, but failed against theflabbypug.
3. Handling central tension as Black
In the English-KID structure vs Mihail Tal’ you played …f5 prematurely, surrendering e6 and d5. A more patient plan is …exd4 followed by …Ne7-f5, keeping the centre elastic.
4. Technical endgames
The resignation against Ben Dover was unnecessary; the queen ending is drawable with perpetual ideas after 48…Qf5+. Spend 15 minutes a day on rook- and queen-endgame studies; it will pay immediate dividends in bullet where technique under time pressure is everything.
Opening tune-ups
- White vs 1…e5: Your Englund answers score well, but consider a calmer 3.Nf3 line to reduce early risk when the clock is low.
- Black vs d4/English: Adopt one “set-up” system (e.g. …d5/…c6 Slav or …Nf6/…e6/…d5 Queen’s Gambit Declined) so you spend zero time on move-ordering.
Training suggestions
- Run the Chess.com “Key Moments” engine on each loss; pause when the eval swings by ±1.5 and ask, “What was the strategic cue I missed?”
- Daily puzzle rush until you average 35; your tactical speed is good but one extra solved puzzle often equals 2-3 saved seconds in a live game.
- Revisit the concept of zugzwang in rook endings—several of your late-game decisions show discomfort in passive defensive positions.
One-sentence game plan
Keep the openings simple, guard the clock until move 20, and drill a handful of critical endgames—do that, and the next rating jump will follow naturally.
Good luck, and see you at the board!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Reinaldo Piñero | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| peonavanzadopd | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| monochronic | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| kralevsk | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| gibberishabcdidontknow | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| almasshagmanov | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| benjaamedina | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| gabriele9117 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| fishbot25 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ernestotobar | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| d4nf6bg51-0 | 118W / 179L / 48D | View Games |
| smilyface4 | 131W / 91L / 7D | View Games |
| 1d42c41-0 | 123W / 46L / 49D | View Games |
| noraa8 | 42W / 47L / 11D | View Games |
| on3zero | 43W / 15L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2268 | 2347 | 2391 | |
| 2024 | 2395 | 2386 | 2401 | |
| 2023 | 2286 | 2310 | 2373 | 1402 |
| 2022 | 2285 | 2258 | 2345 | 1299 |
| 2021 | 2319 | 2199 | 2320 | 1209 |
| 2020 | 2158 | 2139 | 1999 | |
| 2019 | 1046 | 1789 | 1909 | |
| 2018 | 1493 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 548W / 541L / 55D | 477W / 592L / 68D | 68.0 |
| 2024 | 1203W / 1107L / 141D | 1009W / 1272L / 168D | 70.3 |
| 2023 | 869W / 821L / 99D | 749W / 925L / 107D | 68.0 |
| 2022 | 1332W / 1348L / 168D | 1192W / 1499L / 159D | 69.4 |
| 2021 | 1204W / 1047L / 134D | 1121W / 1188L / 124D | 64.1 |
| 2020 | 1374W / 1032L / 133D | 1258W / 1167L / 129D | 69.4 |
| 2019 | 392W / 255L / 25D | 342W / 313L / 36D | 66.8 |
| 2018 | 7W / 0L / 0D | 5W / 0L / 3D | 62.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 1187 | 590 | 527 | 70 | 49.7% |
| Australian Defense | 679 | 354 | 288 | 37 | 52.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 630 | 285 | 310 | 35 | 45.2% |
| French Defense | 560 | 259 | 275 | 26 | 46.2% |
| Catalan Opening | 537 | 289 | 222 | 26 | 53.8% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 524 | 288 | 203 | 33 | 55.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 508 | 220 | 262 | 26 | 43.3% |
| Unknown | 500 | 212 | 257 | 31 | 42.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 492 | 227 | 239 | 26 | 46.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 464 | 208 | 229 | 27 | 44.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 41 | 24 | 12 | 5 | 58.5% |
| French Defense | 21 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 19 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 57.9% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 18 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 55.6% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 18 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 61.1% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 76.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 17 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 47.1% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 16 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 75.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 438 | 234 | 188 | 16 | 53.4% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 334 | 163 | 156 | 15 | 48.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 307 | 152 | 140 | 15 | 49.5% |
| French Defense | 236 | 120 | 109 | 7 | 50.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 207 | 100 | 97 | 10 | 48.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 186 | 96 | 80 | 10 | 51.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 137 | 67 | 63 | 7 | 48.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 120 | 64 | 54 | 2 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 116 | 50 | 63 | 3 | 43.1% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 106 | 59 | 39 | 8 | 55.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Semi-Tarrasch, 5.e3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 1 |
| Losing | 28 | 0 |