Ali Mortazavi (aka BigAl)
International Master – The Mastermind of the Board
Ali Mortazavi, better known in the chess universe as BigAl, is an International Master recognized by FIDE. With a keen tactical awareness and a penchant for comebacks (an impressive 85.48% comeback rate after setbacks), BigAl is no stranger to the intense mental rollercoaster that is competitive chess.
His journey began humbly, with a Blitz rating of 1380 back in 2012. Fast forward to peak performances in 2018 and beyond, and Ali has soared to a blazing Blitz rating peak of 2660 in November 2018! In Bullet play, he’s equally fierce, achieving a remarkable peak rating of 2625 in September 2021, while his Rapid rating peaked at a solid 2398 in April 2022.
BigAl's style? Patience mixed with aggression. With an average of over 72 moves per win, he enjoys long strategic battles, savoring the sweet taste of well-fought victories. His games often boast an 80% frequency of endgames — a testament to his skill navigating those tense, nerve-wracking final moments. And when the going gets tough, BigAl proves resilient, recovering from losing material 45% of the time to still snag a win.
Despite chess being a serious game, BigAl brings a bit of fun to the battlefield. Known for occasionally resigning early (just 1.25% of the time — so don’t worry, he’s mostly a fighter!), he also has a quirky tilt factor of 11, showing he's human and passionate. His best time to unleash moves? The mysterious hour of 2 AM — apparently, BigAl does his best scheming while the rest of the world sleeps.
Career Highlights & Stats:
- Win-Loss-Draw Record (Blitz): 2633 wins, 2719 losses, 281 draws
- Longest Winning Streak: 22 games
- Favorite Opening: Top Secret — but rumor has it, he’s fond of the Reti and King’s Indian Attack as well.
- Playing Strength: White pieces win rate ~48.8%, Black ~44.9%
- Victory Style: Prefers opponents resigning (1681 wins by resignation), but also racks up wins by checkmate and timeouts.
Notable Recent Game:
In a recent Blitz clash (March 1, 2025), BigAl dazzled with the Reti Opening and King’s Indian Attack against Ghazghkull-Thraka, securing victory by resignation after a tense 52-move duel. His precision and patience forced his opponent's surrender, reinforcing BigAl’s reputation for outlasting and outthinking foes.
Behind the Scenes
Whether facing a grandmaster or that unpredictable internet blitz legend, BigAl's psychological game is sharp. He’s notorious for making opponents sweat, boasting a near-perfect 90% win rate against certain foes, and a flawless 100% against others who dared to challenge him.
In the world of chess, Ali "BigAl" Mortazavi is a tactician with a knack for both grinding out wins and thrilling comebacks. His enemies better watch out – at any hour, he could be plotting his next victory... preferably at 2 AM, when the chess magic truly happens.
Overall Performance Feedback
Ali, your recent blitz games demonstrate solid fighting spirit and an ability to capitalize on dynamic positions. Your current strength adjusted win rate is just above 50%, which shows you are competitively handling your opponents, especially at this fast time control.
However, the rating trend over the past 6 months shows a decline, with a negative slope indicating some struggles or inconsistency recently. Despite this, shorter-term trends like the 1-month slope indicate some signs of improvement which is encouraging.
Consistency and focus on key areas could help you regain and push beyond your earlier peak performance.
Opening Repertoire and Strategy
You often open with the King's Indian Attack and the Caro-Kann Defense variations, showing preference for flexible, solid structures that allow for gradual build-up and attacking chances. Here are some observations and suggestions:
- Your use of Reti Opening and King's Indian Attack is effective, controlling the center and preparing for tactical opportunities. Continue deepening your understanding of typical middle-game plans in these openings.
- In the Caro-Kann Defense games, your handling of exchanges and pawn structure aimed to create good central control, but watch out for counter-attacks, especially along open files and diagonals for your opponent’s pieces.
- Consider reviewing the Sicilian Defense positions, particularly against the setups your recent opponents used, to shore up defenses and seek sharper counter-play when you face aggressive responses.
Critical Moments in Recent Games
Some key points where improvements could help your results:
- Maintaining strong piece coordination after exchanges, to avoid losing initiative, as seen in middle-games where you faced pressure on your king or lost control of key squares.
- Time management is crucial in blitz; ensure you allocate your time wisely in complex positions to avoid rushed decisions that lead to tactical oversights.
- In endgames, focus on precise king and pawn play, as some losses involved tactical threats by your opponent that could be delayed or avoided with careful calculation.
Areas for Improvement
To continue developing your blitz skills and improve your rating trajectory, consider working on:
- Regularly practicing tactical exercises to sharpen calculation and pattern recognition, reducing tactical errors during games.
- Studying typical strategic plans in your chosen openings, to convert small advantages into wins more consistently.
- Analyzing losses for recurring mistakes—such as overlooking threats, weak squares, or pawn structure weaknesses—to build personalized improvement plans.
- Strengthening your endgame technique, particularly king and pawn endgames, which often decide blitz outcomes.
Encouragement and Next Steps
Your positive short-term rating trend and competitive win rate show strong potential. Keep focusing on learning from your games and applying insights actively. Regular review of game databases and focused opening practice will pay dividends.
Remember, steady progress with balanced study and gameplay will get you back on an upward rating curve and make your blitz play more resilient and effective.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| smortazavi | 147W / 13L / 4D | |
| Richard Pert | 20W / 33L / 7D | |
| Lawrence Trent | 13W / 15L / 1D | |
| generalistzero | 18W / 4L / 1D | |
| makitech | 13W / 9L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2174 | 2540 | ||
| 2024 | 2460 | 2582 | ||
| 2023 | 2469 | 2531 | 2095 | |
| 2022 | 2544 | 2506 | 2398 | |
| 2021 | 2579 | 2477 | 2333 | |
| 2020 | 2520 | 2441 | ||
| 2019 | 2424 | 2476 | ||
| 2018 | 2170 | 2407 | ||
| 2017 | 1544 | |||
| 2012 | 1380 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14W / 29L / 2D | 17W / 28L / 0D | 70.8 |
| 2024 | 19W / 37L / 4D | 25W / 37L / 1D | 83.8 |
| 2023 | 327W / 356L / 36D | 269W / 391L / 37D | 78.8 |
| 2022 | 119W / 142L / 12D | 129W / 148L / 15D | 78.8 |
| 2021 | 238W / 194L / 18D | 225W / 189L / 17D | 80.0 |
| 2020 | 91W / 83L / 6D | 95W / 66L / 6D | 76.0 |
| 2019 | 357W / 349L / 42D | 315W / 418L / 34D | 73.4 |
| 2018 | 338W / 250L / 31D | 304W / 277L / 34D | 68.5 |
| 2017 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 52.0 |
| 2012 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 39.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 781 | 365 | 384 | 32 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 361 | 180 | 173 | 8 | 49.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 347 | 157 | 171 | 19 | 45.2% |
| Modern | 290 | 131 | 150 | 9 | 45.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 282 | 125 | 137 | 20 | 44.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 206 | 108 | 87 | 11 | 52.4% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 187 | 78 | 94 | 15 | 41.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 181 | 82 | 90 | 9 | 45.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 148 | 58 | 76 | 14 | 39.2% |
| French Defense | 128 | 65 | 55 | 8 | 50.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 82 | 37 | 44 | 1 | 45.1% |
| Modern | 50 | 15 | 33 | 2 | 30.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 48 | 22 | 23 | 3 | 45.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 27 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 23 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 52.2% |
| Czech Defense | 19 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 52.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 17 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 35.3% |
| East Indian Defense | 15 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 2 |