Eshan Guha (aka BigPiano)
Meet Eshan Guha, a National Master who dances through the chaos of the chessboard with the grace of a grandmaster and the stamina of a chess marathon runner. With a bullet rating rocketing beyond 2500 and blitz peaks flirting with 2476, Eshan has proven that speed is not just for sprinters but for brains wired to calculate lightning-fast combos.
Their journey from humble beginnings (a modest bullet rating just over 1100 in 2017) to becoming a feared tactician who has a 78% comeback rate and astonishing 100% win rate after losing a piece is nothing short of legendary. Eshan’s games tend to be long affairs—as indicated by an average of nearly 69 moves in wins and even more in losses—showing a love for the grind and strategic battles that test endurance and wit.
Psychologically, Eshan tilts but only a little (that Tilt Factor of 9 reminds us they’re human after all), and when it comes to openings, let's just say their "Top Secret" repertoire keeps opponents guessing and often outmatched, boasting over 57% win rate in bullet and a spicy 61% in blitz games.
Not only a fierce competitor but also a player who cherishes the endgame, Eshan has an impressive 72% frequency of pushing games deep—a testament to their strategic patience and endurance. Whether playing white or black, their win rates consistently hug 58%, showing no favoritism for color, just pure chess love.
Off the board, Eshan’s favorite opening moves and signature style remain a mystery to most—but their victories do all the talking. Just don’t challenge them late on a Monday or early morning hours; rumor has it that’s when they are most unstoppable, clocking win rates over 60%.
In summary, Eshan Guha is the kind of player who reminds you chess is a battle of brains and nerves, speed and strategy, and sometimes, just a big piano pounding on the keys of victory.
Hi Eshan, great to see you grinding! 👊
What you’re already doing well
- Dynamic piece activity. In several wins (e.g. your 22.Rxg6+ miniature) you willingly sacrifice material for initiative—excellent practical weapon in 60 s games.
- Opening repertoire consistency. As White you mix 1.e4 Exchange Caro-Kann lines and the Nimzowitsch–Larsen (1.b3) while as Black you stick to …c6/…g6 structures. Knowing the resulting middlegames gives you quick moves on the clock.
- Punchy tactics. Sequences like 17.Nh5–22.Nxg6 in your most-recent win show sharp calculation skills.
Biggest improvement levers
-
Time management – your #1 rating limiter
Five of your last six losses were “lost on time” while still drawable/ won on the board.
• Adopt a “Bronstein split”: spend at most half the game clock on the first 15 moves.
• Blunder-check routine: final 3 seconds before every move ask “What can my opponent do if I play this?”—cuts unnecessary double-checking.
• Try a few games in increment time controls (e.g. 1 | 1) to practise playing with near-zero time but still converting. -
End-game conversion
In the Vienna loss you were two pawns up on move 37 but let Kd6-c6 infiltrate. Recommend
• Daily 10-minute drill: random rook-pawn endings vs engine at depth 8.
• Memorise the “three basic rook checks” technique (side, front, cut-off).
• Review Very Basic Endgames chapter on the Philidor & Lucena positions (Lucena). -
Structure over queen sorties in French-type positions
Game vs Der_Balak_3Halak: 14.f3? weakened dark squares and let …Bb7–…e5 crash through.
• In French/Rubinstein lines aim for the standard plan: 14.a4, 15.Bd3, keep pawn chain c3–d4–e5.
• Principle: “Don’t move a pawn you may have to defend.” -
Modern/ Pterodactyl defence resourcefulness
KomiljonAzizov punished 8.e5 Ng8!? 9.e6. Solution: after 8.e5 retreat to d5 (…Nd7-f6 plan) or strike with …d6 undermining e5. Create a one-page cue-card of critical moves in this line and glance at it before sessions.
Action plan for the next two weeks
| Day | Task (≈30 min) |
|---|---|
| Mon / Thu | 10 bullet games, focus on staying >20 s after move 20. Self-tag any move where you spent >5 s. |
| Tue / Fri | Endgame drill set “Basic Rook vs Pawn” (Chessable or homemade Lichess study). |
| Wed / Sat | Opening flashcards: Caro-Kann Exchange as White; Modern vs 1.e4 as Black. |
| Sun | Play one 10 | 5 game; annotate without engine, then compare with engine. |
Progress tracker
You’ll know the plan is working if:- Average centipawn loss in won games stays <50 while clock time left at checkmate ⩾ 8 s.
- Time-loss percentage drops under 15 % over 50 games (currently 40 %+).
- Endgame test score improves from 6 / 10 to 9 / 10.
Motivation corner
“Strong players aren’t faster because they move quicker; they’re faster because they decide quicker.” Keep sharpening the decision process and the rating follows!Peak ratings so far: Blitz 2499 (2025-06-10) Bullet 2521 (2025-01-19)
Happy grinding, Eshan — see you at the next milestone!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| lepolatupukki | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| brigitfaso | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| earlybird2012 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| laiditmang05_ducminh | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Dmitry Zilberstein | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Kaan Akbaş | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| houseofdurin | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Munci Inonu | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Timur Kocharin | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Alex Ivanov | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| robotguy | 22W / 36L / 2D | View Games |
| Sounak Bagchi | 19W / 13L / 11D | View Games |
| ldog17 | 10W / 11L / 2D | View Games |
| stillsmileeyyyy | 18W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| eshaanbarkataki | 16W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2656 | 2521 | ||
| 2024 | 2397 | 2451 | ||
| 2023 | 2428 | 2339 | 2201 | |
| 2022 | 2377 | 2369 | ||
| 2021 | 2202 | 2166 | 2261 | |
| 2020 | 1856 | 2145 | 2138 | |
| 2019 | 1771 | 1895 | 1761 | |
| 2018 | 1323 | 1547 | 1655 | |
| 2017 | 1374 | 1720 | 1612 | |
| 2016 | 1520 | 1310 | ||
| 2015 | 1200 | 1310 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 143W / 121L / 27D | 131W / 140L / 20D | 87.6 |
| 2024 | 23W / 22L / 5D | 22W / 28L / 3D | 83.8 |
| 2023 | 34W / 26L / 6D | 27W / 31L / 4D | 90.4 |
| 2022 | 25W / 16L / 3D | 25W / 13L / 5D | 84.4 |
| 2021 | 42W / 7L / 7D | 49W / 11L / 5D | 82.2 |
| 2020 | 141W / 70L / 38D | 144W / 94L / 23D | 92.0 |
| 2019 | 321W / 184L / 20D | 336W / 178L / 18D | 62.5 |
| 2018 | 57W / 30L / 3D | 54W / 33L / 3D | 64.6 |
| 2017 | 69W / 66L / 10D | 84W / 51L / 4D | 77.7 |
| 2016 | 4W / 3L / 2D | 6W / 4L / 0D | 81.3 |
| 2015 | 8W / 13L / 0D | 4W / 16L / 0D | 77.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 23 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 43.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 17 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 47.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Benoni Defense | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 41.7% |
| Slav Defense | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 101 | 83 | 16 | 2 | 82.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 48 | 33 | 13 | 2 | 68.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 38 | 21 | 15 | 2 | 55.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 35 | 14 | 18 | 3 | 40.0% |
| Slav Defense | 34 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 52.9% |
| Benko Gambit | 30 | 10 | 16 | 4 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 26 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 26 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 57.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 23 | 13 | 8 | 2 | 56.5% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 23 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 56.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 192 | 139 | 47 | 6 | 72.4% |
| Czech Defense | 135 | 83 | 49 | 3 | 61.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 76 | 36 | 32 | 8 | 47.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 71 | 38 | 26 | 7 | 53.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 57 | 26 | 31 | 0 | 45.6% |
| French Defense | 56 | 34 | 21 | 1 | 60.7% |
| Modern | 56 | 29 | 23 | 4 | 51.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 49 | 21 | 24 | 4 | 42.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 37 | 20 | 13 | 4 | 54.0% |
| Australian Defense | 32 | 22 | 10 | 0 | 68.8% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 31 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 1 |