Chris Welcome (aka Blackbearcsw)
Meet Chris Welcome, a National Master whose chess career is anything but boring. Starting out with a humble blitz rating barely touching 1000 in 2012, Chris embarked on a journey of tactical wizardry and fierce competition that skyrocketed their blitz rating to over 2200 by 2021. Oh, and did we mention they maintained a blistering win rate in fast-paced bullet and rapid games? With a blitz peak rating flirting with 2300 in recent years, Chris certainly knows how to put the pressure on the clock.
Chris’s style is a mix of resilience and audacity: an astonishing 90% comeback rate and a flawless 100% win rate after losing a piece showcase a mind that refuses to quit. They love a good endgame, with over 86% of their games venturing into the final battles—somewhere Chris really shines by teasing victory out of long scrambles. Beware the patience game; they average around 77 moves per win, proving chess marathons are their bread and butter.
When not torturing opponents with 17-win streaks (their longest!), Chris dabbles in psychological warfare, although the tilt factor of 13 hints they occasionally grumble about a blunder or two. Fun fact: Their cunning is so sly that opponents like "lstefl" and "joz2000" have to watch out—Chris boasts a perfect 100% win record against them.
Whether it’s blitz, bullet, or rapid, Chris's games are a rollercoaster of dramatic swings and calculated play. Expect early resignations from foes who realize quickly that Chris’s strategic toolkit is loaded. A quirky play hour? Try 9 AM or 10 AM — Chris hits near 60% and over 70% win rates respectively, so morning challengers beware!
In short, Chris Welcome is the kind of player who might smile politely before dismantling your defenses, then quietly walks away plotting the next brilliant combination. National Master by title, relentless grinder by nature, and cheeky chess adventurer by choice.
Hi Chris, here’s some personalized feedback based on your recent games.
What you’re already doing well
- Initiative-oriented play. Your wins often arise from forcing pawn breaks (f4/f5, g-pawns) that open files for your pieces. This shows good middlegame awareness and confidence in dynamic positions.
- Piece activity out of the opening. As Black in the Nimzo-Indian you repeatedly hit …Bb4, …Ne4 ideas early and seize squares before White completes development.
- Staying alert to opponent’s time trouble. Three of your recent wins came when you kept pressure on the clock, demonstrating that you can play quickly when needed.
Key themes to focus on next
1. Time management (highest ROI)
You lost two games simply by running out of time in drawable or even winning positions. Aim to arrive at move 25 with at least 45 seconds still on the clock.
- Think during your opponent’s turn; decide on a candidate move before it’s your move.
- Use the “touch-move rule” mentally: pick a move and stick to it instead of hovering between options.
- When < 20 s, simplify: trade queens or force perpetuals rather than calculating deep combinations.
2. Dragon structure vs 9. O-O-O (critical theory gap)
In the loss against swiveleyedknight the sequence 9…d5 10.Kb1 e5?! gave White three central pawns for one and let the queen invade with 15.Qxa8. Review the main line 9…d5 10.exd5 …Nb4 or consider the safer Accelerated Dragon set-up.
Mini-replay of the turning point:
3. Calculation discipline
Several setbacks start with “looks-active” moves that drop material two moves later (e.g., 24…Rb8?? in the Slav game, 18…e4 in the QGA). Add a 5-second “blunder check” before committing:
- What is my opponent’s most forcing reply—checks, captures, threats?
- If I answer it, does anything hang afterwards?
Doing 10 puzzles/day that feature double-checks and intermediate moves Zwischenzug will sharpen this skill.
4. Endgame & conversion
You often reach winning rook endings but allow counterplay (see the QGA time-forfeit). Practical tips:
- Push your healthiest passed pawn first; shoulder the enemy king with your rook.
- When you’re up a rook vs pawn(s), trade rooks only if the resulting king-pawn ending is a tablebase win.
- Memorize the Lucena and Philidor positions; they show up frequently in blitz time scrambles.
5. Opening housekeeping
| Colour | Current choice | Quick fix |
|---|---|---|
| White | English 1.c4 g3/Bg2 systems | Add >=1 main-line e4 opening (Italian or Scotch) so you practise open-centre tactics too. |
| Black vs d4 | Nimzo-Indian & QGD | Looks solid—just review pawn-up endings to convert faster. |
| Black vs e4 | Dragon / Accelerated | Memorise critical Yugoslav lines up to move 15 or switch to Najdorf …e6 if theory feels lighter. |
Progress tracker
• Current personal best: 2309 (2023-09-29)
• Weekly performance heat-map:
Action plan for the next 10 days
- 30 minutes daily on themed tactics (double attacks & deflection).
- Play 5 games where you must keep >20 seconds by move 30—resign early if you fail (time-discipline drill).
- Analyse one lost game per day without engine for 15 minutes, then compare with engine to spot what you missed.
- Rehearse the Dragon critical line with a friend or the computer until you can play it from memory.
Keep enjoying the game, Chris! Your tactical eye and fighting spirit are clear strengths—polish the time usage and tighten calculation checks and you’ll cruise past 2300 soon.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mfun2016 | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| rborb7 | 6W / 3L / 1D | View |
| superchessbestplayer | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| vbvb1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ahmedgaber16 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nislija1993 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| askler44 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| vlajkonn | 6W / 1L / 0D | View |
| soldh1 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| tribuncapa | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| hroark23 | 26W / 27L / 5D | View Games |
| bata_bg | 26W / 14L / 13D | View Games |
| skender388 | 26W / 21L / 6D | View Games |
| armen007 | 32W / 16L / 3D | View Games |
| ubaid2006 | 25W / 23L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2215 | |||
| 2024 | 2121 | |||
| 2023 | 2196 | |||
| 2022 | 2004 | 2099 | 2094 | |
| 2021 | 2024 | 2201 | 2143 | |
| 2020 | 1700 | 2044 | 1815 | |
| 2019 | 2005 | |||
| 2012 | 1016 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1090W / 983L / 190D | 1042W / 1008L / 207D | 86.2 |
| 2024 | 1178W / 1009L / 198D | 1086W / 1076L / 222D | 85.1 |
| 2023 | 1452W / 1239L / 299D | 1358W / 1336L / 287D | 85.9 |
| 2022 | 2095W / 1765L / 334D | 1937W / 2001L / 328D | 82.5 |
| 2021 | 2209W / 1677L / 381D | 1975W / 1932L / 400D | 81.9 |
| 2020 | 2501W / 2042L / 372D | 2271W / 2277L / 379D | 80.0 |
| 2019 | 72W / 41L / 3D | 64W / 47L / 5D | 80.2 |
| 2012 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 16.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 1929 | 897 | 859 | 173 | 46.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 1381 | 638 | 638 | 105 | 46.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1105 | 523 | 480 | 102 | 47.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1090 | 462 | 543 | 85 | 42.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 951 | 481 | 394 | 76 | 50.6% |
| Australian Defense | 947 | 491 | 379 | 77 | 51.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 909 | 404 | 435 | 70 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 849 | 389 | 383 | 77 | 45.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 736 | 381 | 314 | 41 | 51.8% |
| English Opening | 714 | 355 | 295 | 64 | 49.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 504 | 250 | 217 | 37 | 49.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 337 | 137 | 171 | 29 | 40.6% |
| Australian Defense | 324 | 167 | 129 | 28 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 318 | 159 | 143 | 16 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 285 | 126 | 124 | 35 | 44.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 268 | 125 | 122 | 21 | 46.6% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 268 | 139 | 105 | 24 | 51.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 265 | 133 | 112 | 20 | 50.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 224 | 103 | 100 | 21 | 46.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 202 | 102 | 75 | 25 | 50.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 136 | 58 | 66 | 12 | 42.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 103 | 45 | 44 | 14 | 43.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 75 | 34 | 31 | 10 | 45.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 71 | 40 | 24 | 7 | 56.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 70 | 31 | 33 | 6 | 44.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 69 | 32 | 27 | 10 | 46.4% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 56 | 30 | 23 | 3 | 53.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 46 | 17 | 22 | 7 | 37.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 44 | 25 | 13 | 6 | 56.8% |
| Benko Gambit | 42 | 19 | 20 | 3 | 45.2% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |