Becca Lampman (Blampman)
Woman Candidate Master - FIDE
Becca Lampman, also known by the username Blampman, is an accomplished and titled chess player recognized as a Woman Candidate Master by FIDE. With a strategic mind sharper than a knight’s fork and a track record that would make even Magnus Carlsen nod in respect, Becca's chess journey is nothing short of inspiring.
Starting from humble beginnings with a blitz rating around 1350 in 2013, Becca swiftly climbed the ranks, hitting a peak blitz rating of 2533 in late 2024. Known for a relentless playing style and a tactical awareness that boasts a comeback rate of over 82% when down material, Becca strikes the board with unyielding focus.
Becca’s favorite opening family in blitz is the intriguingly mysterious "Top Secret" — perhaps because some secrets are best kept on the board! Dominating opponents with a win rate surpassing 52% in blitz games, Becca also dabbles effectively in daily, rapid, and bullet formats, reaching peak ratings of 1935, 2311, and 2457 respectively.
Known among peers for a patient and strategic approach, Becca’s games often extend to long battles, averaging about 74 moves per victory. Endgames are where the magic happens, with Becca entering the vanguard nearly three-quarters of the time. The psychological resilience is notable too, with a tilt factor of just 13 — proving that losing a queen doesn’t mean losing the mind.
Becca has faced a wide array of opponents, holding impressive win rates (including 62.42% against “stevenwitt” and a perfect score against multiple challengers). Matches are often won by resignation, confirming Becca's knack for applying deadly pressure until opponents fold like a hastily sacrificed pawn.
Playing Style & Fun Facts
- Master of the "Early Resignation": only resigns about 3.6% of losses — showing true fighter spirit.
- Enjoys grinding out endgames with a wisdom of a seasoned grandmaster.
- Best time to catch Becca playing their best: around 11:00 AM — so set your alarms if you want a challenge!
- Average moves per loss hover around 62, indicating hard-fought battles even in defeat.
- Current winning streak? Always ready to build it bigger — most impressive streak stands at 27 wins flawless!
Recent Highlights
Becca's recent victories include a compelling daily game where Blampman triumphed with the English Opening, ending with the opponent resigning after a well-executed positional squeeze. In live blitz action, Becca's nimble and precise moves led to clutch victories on the clock, showcasing nerves of steel against high-rated opponents.
Just a quick note for the chess community: back rank mates beware, because Becca is on the hunt to turn your castle into rubble!
Becca Lampman—definitely a name to remember, whether you’re a challenger or a fan!
Analysis and Feedback for Becca Lampman
Becca, you've demonstrated solid fundamentals and consistent technique in your recent games. Your ability to convert advantages against strong opposition is commendable, and your tactical awareness often puts pressure on opponents early in the game. Here are some constructive points to help you elevate your play further:
Strengths
- Opening Preparation: Your choice of openings and understanding of their typical plans (for example, the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack and Grunfeld Defense Exchange Variation) align well with your style. This helps you reach playable middlegame positions comfortably.
- Positional Understanding: You manage space and piece activity well, effectively using your minor pieces and rook placements to restrict your opponents' counterplay.
- Endgame Technique: You close out winning positions confidently, often forcing resignations rather than relying on opponent time pressure, which indicates good calculation and technique.
Areas for Improvement
- Time Management: In some games, you used a significant amount of time in the opening and early middlegame stages (e.g., moves like 14. Na4 and 15. dxc6 in the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack). Try to balance your clock usage by preparing common opening plans to help you save time for complex middle and endgame positions.
- Handling Complex Tactical Sequences: While your tactics are strong, there are moments where under time pressure or in sharper positions, you might overlook opponent threats. Drilling tactical motifs regularly can help sharpen your calculation speed.
- Counteracting Opponent Initiative: In your losses, there were moments when your opponent gained sustained pressure on key squares or active piece play (e.g., in the Grunfeld and King's Indian Defense lines). Working on defensive resources and prophylactic moves in these openings can improve your resilience.
Next Steps
- Review your opening repertoire with a focus on common tactical themes and pawn breaks to speed up your early game decisions.
- Incorporate more endgame study, especially rook and minor piece endgames, to capitalize on your solid technique and increase confidence in complex finishes.
- Practice time-controlled puzzles to improve your ability to quickly recognize tactical opportunities under clock pressure.
Keep up the excellent work, Becca! Your games show great promise, and with focused training on these areas, your overall strength will continue to rise.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| stevenwitt | 105W / 53L / 9D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| stevenwitt | 105W / 53L / 9D | |
| Caleb Kircher | 28W / 20L / 7D | |
| drmelkor3 | 20W / 25L / 4D | |
| Pierre Solange Coqauvin Mousse DeLaMer Briesonbless | 21W / 16L / 3D | |
| lost_tomato | 7W / 25L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2511 | 1814 | ||
| 2024 | 2402 | 2511 | 1449 | |
| 2023 | 2423 | 2311 | 2102 | 1781 |
| 2022 | 2402 | 2403 | 2102 | 1883 |
| 2021 | 2406 | 2343 | 2053 | 1800 |
| 2020 | 2253 | 2301 | 1992 | 1817 |
| 2019 | 2117 | 2171 | 2030 | 1780 |
| 2018 | 2143 | 2105 | 1831 | |
| 2017 | 2104 | 2117 | 1804 | |
| 2016 | 2203 | 2152 | 1200 | 1805 |
| 2015 | 2202 | 2047 | 1778 | |
| 2014 | 2056 | 1899 | ||
| 2013 | 1900 | 1846 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12W / 10L / 1D | 12W / 10L / 0D | 22.0 |
| 2024 | 173W / 108L / 12D | 156W / 114L / 10D | 62.9 |
| 2023 | 229W / 155L / 26D | 196W / 165L / 26D | 68.5 |
| 2022 | 599W / 446L / 62D | 545W / 504L / 61D | 73.3 |
| 2021 | 1236W / 958L / 138D | 1134W / 1043L / 134D | 74.2 |
| 2020 | 573W / 396L / 43D | 532W / 431L / 38D | 67.2 |
| 2019 | 157W / 92L / 14D | 145W / 106L / 12D | 68.9 |
| 2018 | 71W / 39L / 0D | 53W / 45L / 6D | 68.1 |
| 2017 | 108W / 101L / 6D | 106W / 96L / 7D | 71.0 |
| 2016 | 97W / 64L / 7D | 88W / 69L / 11D | 76.6 |
| 2015 | 449W / 350L / 49D | 414W / 385L / 47D | 70.1 |
| 2014 | 370W / 250L / 28D | 325W / 276L / 36D | 69.8 |
| 2013 | 317W / 197L / 27D | 284W / 224L / 36D | 72.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 384 | 217 | 151 | 16 | 56.5% |
| Unknown | 380 | 225 | 152 | 3 | 59.2% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 331 | 191 | 127 | 13 | 57.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 297 | 153 | 131 | 13 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 273 | 136 | 122 | 15 | 49.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 263 | 148 | 101 | 14 | 56.3% |
| Australian Defense | 255 | 130 | 121 | 4 | 51.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 246 | 118 | 109 | 19 | 48.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 211 | 101 | 99 | 11 | 47.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 204 | 104 | 91 | 9 | 51.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 32 | 12 | 17 | 3 | 37.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 31 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 67.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 29 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 65.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 27 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 51.9% |
| Australian Defense | 25 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 64.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 25 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 64.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 54.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 73.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 23 | 9 | 10 | 4 | 39.1% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 693 | 368 | 286 | 39 | 53.1% |
| Australian Defense | 274 | 155 | 102 | 17 | 56.6% |
| East Indian Defense | 269 | 134 | 121 | 14 | 49.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 225 | 106 | 104 | 15 | 47.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 191 | 103 | 78 | 10 | 53.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 185 | 85 | 92 | 8 | 46.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 163 | 82 | 77 | 4 | 50.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 131 | 73 | 56 | 2 | 55.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 130 | 67 | 61 | 2 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 127 | 64 | 61 | 2 | 50.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |