Braden Laughlin — The Daily Chess Streamer
Braden Laughlin, online as BradenLaughlin, is a chess streamer who loves turning long, thoughtful games into entertaining learning moments. His streams blend careful analysis with humor, community Q&A, and a steady cadence of Daily games that keep viewers coming back for more ideas, mistakes, and occasional brilliancies.
Fans know Braden for his approachable style and regular schedule. Follow the profile at BradenLaughlin.
Career arc and peak moments
Braden’s online chess journey blends consistent practice with the thrill of live commentary. His peak ratings across time controls capture a wide, adaptable skill set: Rapid 2165 (2022-05-04), Blitz 2310 (2024-08-26), Bullet 2158 (2025-05-02), and Daily 2071 (2025-10-06). These milestones reflect a player who enjoys both deep, long-form calculation and rapid, in-the-moment decision making.
Playing style and opening flavor
Braden favors dynamic, tactical play and practical, resilient defenses. In Rapid, he has shown strength with a mix of aggressive and solid setups, while in Blitz his repertoire leans toward sharp lines and fast, practical solutions. He often explores a blend of openings such as the Amar Gambit and Nimzo-Larsen Attack for punch and creativity, balanced by sturdy systems like the Caro-Kann and Scandinavian when the position calls for restraint.
- Amar Gambit: Amar Gambit
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Nimzo-Larsen Attack
- Sicilian flavors and Najdorf variations: Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation
Streaming persona and schedule
Daily time controls are Braden’s preferred rhythm, and his streams invite viewers to learn by watching the process unfold. Expect friendly chat, live ideas, and honest reflections after each game. For a quick read on rating trends, see the live placeholder:
.Profile: BradenLaughlin
Notes on competition and pacing
Braden’s catalog spans multiple time controls and openings, combining steady improvement with a playful, approachable vibe. He keeps a close eye on streaks and community feedback, turning losses into lessons and wins into moments to celebrate. Quick stats and historical trends can be explored through the placeholders above or in his ongoing streams.
Chess Feedback for Braden Laughlin
Based on your recent blitz games, here are some tailored insights and areas for improvement to help you continue growing as a player:
Strengths
- Opening repertoire: You've developed solid familiarity with openings like the King's Indian Attack and the Caro-Kann Panov Variation. This gives you a stable foundation for your games.
- Positional intuition: In your wins, you demonstrate good understanding of pawn structures and piece activity, exerting pressure and converting advantages cleanly.
- Time management: You generally maintain adequate clock time with good pacing, which is crucial in blitz formats.
Areas for Improvement
- Handling complications: In some losses, especially the one against C3BR (see [[Link|game|139332408222]]), you struggled with tactical challenges in the middlegame after your opponent's aggressive advances like early
g4andg5. Focusing on spotting tactical motifs more quickly will benefit your play in complex positions. - Endgame technique: Several games featured close endgames with subtle imbalances (e.g., pawn structure weaknesses and piece activity). Spending time practicing theoretical endgames and technique will help in converting or defending tight positions more successfully.
- Opening sharpness: While your openings are fundamentally sound, be wary of allowing your opponent too much space early on, such as in the Sicilian Defense lines against the Smith-Morra Gambit and Reti. Studying key theoretical traps and common plans in these openings can prevent early disadvantages.
- Reducing time pressure errors: Although you usually manage your clock well, some losses were on time or involved rushed moves in critical moments. Consider using small pauses to double-check critical tactical calculations even in blitz.
Next Steps
- Review these recent games carefully, noting particularly where tactics were missed or endgame nuances slipped. For example, is a complex position where you faced pressure aggressively.
- Integrate tactic puzzles focusing on pins, forks, and attacking the king side, as seen in your games.
- Consider deepening your King's Indian Attack understanding since you achieve good results with it.
- Practice quick endgame drills to improve precision in rook and minor piece endings common in blitz play.
Overall, you are playing strong blitz games at your rating level. Keep balancing tactical training, endgame practice, and opening preparation to make the most of your time control preference. Blitz rewards fast, accurate pattern recognition, and your recent progress shows you are on the right track.
Feel free to share any specific areas you'd like deeper help with. Keep up the good work, Braden!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| bmiko | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| crypchesss | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| r4ulit0 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| alexk71 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| gmbt0 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| duypdt | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| bombaclat07 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| rqmalin | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| marco3777 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| omoli | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jack Rodgers | 2W / 62L / 1D | |
| brendgame | 26W / 23L / 6D | |
| Frank Johnson | 8W / 42L / 3D | |
| chessnerdbird | 39W / 8L / 2D | |
| kinglybingly | 33W / 12L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2139 | 2303 | 2142 | 2071 |
| 2024 | 2072 | 2258 | 2087 | 2006 |
| 2023 | 1894 | 2270 | 2063 | 2062 |
| 2022 | 2050 | 2154 | 2116 | 2040 |
| 2021 | 2052 | 2050 | 2031 | 1913 |
| 2020 | 2031 | 1961 | 1868 | 1879 |
| 2019 | 1703 | 1903 | 1830 | 1795 |
| 2018 | 1660 | 1751 | 1821 | 1687 |
| 2017 | 978 | 1445 | 1752 | 1587 |
| 2016 | 413 | 709 | 898 | 1156 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 222W / 147L / 28D | 181W / 185L / 26D | 78.5 |
| 2024 | 328W / 325L / 42D | 291W / 343L / 61D | 82.2 |
| 2023 | 182W / 181L / 30D | 193W / 181L / 23D | 78.8 |
| 2022 | 393W / 297L / 41D | 364W / 307L / 65D | 73.5 |
| 2021 | 526W / 324L / 55D | 481W / 367L / 55D | 74.6 |
| 2020 | 637W / 442L / 67D | 642W / 432L / 66D | 76.0 |
| 2019 | 486W / 411L / 33D | 493W / 417L / 39D | 72.8 |
| 2018 | 1518W / 1135L / 88D | 1433W / 1202L / 83D | 70.2 |
| 2017 | 362W / 211L / 29D | 327W / 239L / 22D | 69.5 |
| 2016 | 48W / 35L / 6D | 36W / 58L / 3D | 55.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 79 | 48 | 22 | 9 | 60.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 74 | 41 | 31 | 2 | 55.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 47 | 34 | 12 | 1 | 72.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 45 | 30 | 14 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 41 | 28 | 10 | 3 | 68.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 39 | 33 | 4 | 2 | 84.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 36 | 27 | 7 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 35 | 25 | 9 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 35 | 27 | 8 | 0 | 77.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 34 | 23 | 8 | 3 | 67.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 659 | 360 | 277 | 22 | 54.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 536 | 272 | 250 | 14 | 50.8% |
| Modern | 426 | 222 | 185 | 19 | 52.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 282 | 137 | 136 | 9 | 48.6% |
| Australian Defense | 144 | 75 | 66 | 3 | 52.1% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 128 | 65 | 61 | 2 | 50.8% |
| Czech Defense | 127 | 64 | 57 | 6 | 50.4% |
| East Indian Defense | 124 | 60 | 60 | 4 | 48.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 124 | 68 | 53 | 3 | 54.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 78 | 41 | 35 | 2 | 52.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 626 | 347 | 249 | 30 | 55.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 407 | 205 | 187 | 15 | 50.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 349 | 210 | 116 | 23 | 60.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 329 | 168 | 139 | 22 | 51.1% |
| Petrov's Defense | 282 | 139 | 127 | 16 | 49.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 266 | 132 | 124 | 10 | 49.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 262 | 130 | 113 | 19 | 49.6% |
| Czech Defense | 214 | 116 | 90 | 8 | 54.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 213 | 103 | 101 | 9 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 203 | 95 | 99 | 9 | 46.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 0 |
| Losing | 27 | 5 |