FIDE Master Ho Cheung Wong
Ho Cheung Wong, known in the digital chess realm as brianmsk, is a distinguished FIDE Master whose journey through the 64 squares is nothing short of impressive — and occasionally spectacular. With a peak blitz rating soaring to 2338 in May 2025 and a rapid rating cresting at an astonishing 2350, Wong consistently proves capable of outmaneuvering opponents with cunning strategy and a dash of flair.
This player has graced thousands of games across all formats: from lightning-fast bullet battles to the more patient, strategic daily games. Committed and courageous, Wong’s style is a thoughtful blend of deep endgame knowledge — boasting an endgame frequency over 70% — and tactical daring, evidenced by a remarkable comeback rate of nearly 84%. If you thought chess was just about patiently moving pawns, Wong’s games might just convince you otherwise!
Starting with humble beginnings around 1400 blitz in 2010, Wong’s rating graph looks like an inspiring rollercoaster steadily climbing to professional heights rather than plummeting into the abyss. The player’s perseverance shines through, especially when facing adversity, maintaining a win rate above 54% even after losing material.
Among a vast repertoire of openings, Wong favors the Scandinavian Defense and the Queens Pawn Opening, though there’s also a taste for strategic surprises like the Trompowsky Attack and the London System. Not to brag, but “Top Secret” openings have led to over 2,100 wins in blitz alone—performance not quite secret anymore!
Known for his endgame resilience, Wong’s average winning game clocks in around 65 moves, while losses tend to stretch slightly longer — a hint that neither victory nor defeat comes without an epic struggle. They also have a modest tilt factor of 8, proving even FIDE Masters have their off-days (and moments of dramatic flair).
The day’s bright spot for Wong? According to stats, mornings around 9 AM seem to fire up their game most effectively — a perfect time for crushing opponents before their coffee has even cooled.
In short, whether it’s blitz or bullet, rapid or daily, Wong blends grit, brains, and just enough bravado to keep the chess world on its toes. Opponents beware: this FIDE Master plays to win, but never without style (and occasionally with a cheeky grin).
Strengths in Your Recent Blitz Games
Hi Ho Cheung Wong, here are some highlights from your recent blitz games that stand out:
- You demonstrate strong opening preparation, particularly with openings like the Pirc Defense and the Sicilian Defense Anti-Qxd4 variation.
- Your aggressive play and timely exchanges have helped secure important material advantages in critical moments.
- You are able to convert endgame advantages effectively, as seen in your win where you advanced a passed pawn to promotion confidently and accurately.
- You maintain composure and find good defensive resources when faced with pressure, minimizing mistakes and staying competitive.
- Your overall win record and performance with various openings such as the Amar Gambit and Australian Defense show a well-rounded skill set and adaptability to different styles.
Areas for Improvement
To continue improving, here are some areas to focus on based on the analysis of your recent games:
- Time Management: In blitz, managing your clock is crucial. Some losses came from running low on time. Practice quicker calculation techniques and pre-move where safe.
- Midgame Complexity: When positions become tactical or complex, there were moments where critical defensive or offensive moves were missed. Training tactics and pattern recognition can boost your sharpness here.
- Opening Selection and Variation: Diversify and deepen your opening repertoire. Although your current openings work well, having well-prepared sidelines or surprise weapons helps avoid opponents’ preparation.
- Endgame Technique: While your endgame plays are generally strong, there is always room to study key theoretical endgames and practical technique with minimal material to convert advantages faster.
- Handling Pressure: Sometimes under opponent attack or initiative, finding the best counteractive resources sooner could prevent losses. Study defensive motifs and calculation under pressure.
Long-Term Improvement Suggestions
Considering your rating trend and history, here are suggestions to help maintain steady progress:
- Keep a balanced study plan with opening theory, tactical puzzles, and endgame studies to steadily improve all phases of the game.
- Analyze your own losses and near misses to identify recurring errors or missed opportunities — this helps avoid repeating mistakes.
- Use slower time controls occasionally to work on deep calculation and positional understanding beyond blitz speed.
- Leverage your strong openings by exploring related lines to gain confidence and surprise value.
- Maintain a healthy routine to keep sharp focus during blitz sessions, such as warm-up tactics and brief mental resets between games.
Your current upward trends in rating and positive win rates in aggressive openings are great signals. Keep working on the outlined areas and you will likely see continued rating gains and stronger results.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| andseq | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| nathan124536 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| geoff111 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nuchjaree | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| tianxin | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Heinz Fuchs | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| almaster64 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sakshamnain12 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| hrabardabar | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| aarif2020 | 5W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Go Cups Go | 22W / 13L / 3D | View Games |
| themanthatwalkedoutoffire | 22W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
| gchkadrianwong | 17W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| hemaster2 | 11W / 9L / 1D | View Games |
| masterholokton | 18W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2210 | 2353 | 2409 | 1779 |
| 2024 | 2141 | 2238 | 2295 | 1778 |
| 2023 | 1986 | 2139 | 2098 | 1723 |
| 2022 | 1894 | 2117 | 2201 | 1831 |
| 2021 | 1991 | 2029 | 2055 | 400 |
| 2020 | 1976 | 2151 | 1989 | 1745 |
| 2019 | 1740 | 2094 | 1711 | 1659 |
| 2018 | 1919 | 2041 | 1807 | 1811 |
| 2017 | 1890 | 2018 | 1694 | 1794 |
| 2016 | 2026 | 2051 | 1794 | |
| 2015 | 2154 | 1901 | 1794 | |
| 2014 | 1881 | |||
| 2013 | 1710 | 1874 | ||
| 2012 | 1757 | 1542 | ||
| 2011 | 1775 | 1200 | ||
| 2010 | 1406 | 1794 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 290W / 191L / 31D | 264W / 212L / 32D | 70.5 |
| 2024 | 280W / 168L / 44D | 283W / 189L / 26D | 67.6 |
| 2023 | 176W / 110L / 17D | 151W / 134L / 19D | 68.2 |
| 2022 | 165W / 87L / 16D | 149W / 106L / 7D | 66.1 |
| 2021 | 194W / 139L / 18D | 190W / 154L / 20D | 68.0 |
| 2020 | 322W / 130L / 21D | 284W / 163L / 24D | 64.1 |
| 2019 | 71W / 44L / 5D | 73W / 50L / 4D | 70.0 |
| 2018 | 6W / 0L / 0D | 4W / 3L / 0D | 61.8 |
| 2017 | 6W / 8L / 1D | 6W / 9L / 0D | 61.8 |
| 2016 | 112W / 72L / 6D | 112W / 73L / 7D | 69.8 |
| 2015 | 77W / 64L / 7D | 84W / 60L / 9D | 75.1 |
| 2014 | 59W / 28L / 5D | 59W / 35L / 1D | 66.5 |
| 2013 | 163W / 102L / 9D | 131W / 138L / 14D | 73.0 |
| 2012 | 30W / 32L / 3D | 37W / 27L / 3D | 71.1 |
| 2011 | 25W / 14L / 3D | 27W / 15L / 1D | 70.8 |
| 2010 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 48.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 416 | 224 | 170 | 22 | 53.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 326 | 179 | 131 | 16 | 54.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 300 | 180 | 111 | 9 | 60.0% |
| Czech Defense | 201 | 106 | 82 | 13 | 52.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 179 | 98 | 76 | 5 | 54.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 176 | 98 | 67 | 11 | 55.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 161 | 85 | 68 | 8 | 52.8% |
| Modern Defense | 124 | 67 | 49 | 8 | 54.0% |
| Australian Defense | 116 | 72 | 36 | 8 | 62.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 96 | 54 | 35 | 7 | 56.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 162 | 90 | 65 | 7 | 55.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 74 | 35 | 33 | 6 | 47.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 59 | 33 | 25 | 1 | 55.9% |
| Australian Defense | 53 | 26 | 24 | 3 | 49.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 52 | 24 | 23 | 5 | 46.1% |
| Czech Defense | 41 | 23 | 15 | 3 | 56.1% |
| Bird Opening | 40 | 19 | 20 | 1 | 47.5% |
| Dutch Defense | 38 | 17 | 19 | 2 | 44.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 36 | 15 | 20 | 1 | 41.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 27 | 13 | 14 | 0 | 48.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 117 | 77 | 28 | 12 | 65.8% |
| Czech Defense | 85 | 50 | 29 | 6 | 58.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 59 | 37 | 17 | 5 | 62.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 44 | 35 | 9 | 0 | 79.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 37 | 23 | 13 | 1 | 62.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 30 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 30 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 56.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 28 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 26 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 65.4% |
| Modern | 25 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 48.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 27 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 96.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 15 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 86.7% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 1 |