Benjamin J Katz (aka BRJAD0530) - National Master Extraordinaire
Meet Benjamin J Katz, a distinguished National Master who has carved a niche in the world of competitive chess through sheer grit, strategy, and perhaps a little bit of wizardry. Known in the chess circles by the enigmatic username BRJAD0530, Benjamin has shown a mastery over blitz, bullet, and rapid formats with a style that's as dynamic as a knight jumping over pawns.
Starting from modest rapid beginnings at a 1200 rating all the way back in 2010, Benjamin's journey is a tale of steady progression and unstoppable hunger for victory. By 2025, their bullet rating soared impressively over 2300, while blitz battles regularly saw ratings tickle the 2300s as well. Over thousands of blitz games and hundreds of bullet matches, Benjamin’s relentless pursuit of excellence is unmistakable.
Playing Style & Strengths
- Endgame Connoisseur: Benjamin spends a lot of time in the endgame trenches, with a remarkable 72% frequency in endgames — apparently loving the drama of the final moves more than Netflix binge-watching.
- Tactical Wizardry: An astounding 86.25% comeback rate showcases their resilience, often turning near catastrophe into glorious triumphs. Also, their post-piece-lost win rate is a staggering 99.96% — talk about turning lemons into lemonade!
- Patience Personified: With an average of 74 moves per win, Benjamin clearly believes in the art of long, strategic battles, or maybe just enjoys making their opponents sweat.
- Early Resignation Rate: At just 0.32, Benjamin hates giving up early — they’d rather play until the bitter end (and usually win).
Notable Records and Fun Facts
Benjamin shines brightest in bullet chess with a consistent winning record across years, boasting a top win rate of over 52% with their favorite opening intriguingly labeled as "Top Secret" — a mystery as deep as the Sicilian Defense itself. Their longest winning streak hit a solid 10 games, proving once and for all that they’re no flash in the pan.
Interestingly, their games show a slight tilt factor of 9, hinting they might occasionally get a bit playful or frustrated — but hey, who doesn’t? Also, their win rates vary slightly by hour, peaking impressively at 71.43% around 6 AM — maybe they’re secretly an early bird genius or just caffeinated!
Facing opponents repeatedly, Benjamin has favorites they dominate with 100% win rates, keeping their rivals guessing and humble. Their Black pieces have a respectable 46% win-rate, but with White, they counter-punch to just over 50% — not too shabby for a National Master who plays against some fierce competition.
In Summary
Benjamin J Katz is more than just a player — they’re a chess storyteller, weaving moves, tactics, and psychology into a compelling and sometimes humorous saga on the 64 squares. With stamina, creativity, and an ever-improving rating that teases the masters, Benjamin keeps pushing forward as a force to reckon with. National Master today, chess legend tomorrow? Only time (and more matches) will tell.
Feedback for Benjamin J Katz
What you are already doing well
- Opening variety. With the White pieces you alternate between classical main-lines (e.g. 1.e4-d4 structures) and surprise weapons such as 2.Qf3/2.Qg3 in the King’s-Pawn Opening. As Black you show comfort in both Pirc set-ups (…d6 …g6) and solid queen-pawn defences (…d5, Slav structures). This flexibility makes you difficult to prepare for.
- Tactical alertness. Games such as the win versus
hehehehehehahwfeature crisp shots (24.Rxd5!, 25.Qxf6!) that exploit loose pieces and overloaded defenders. Even in time scrambles you spot one-move tactics quickly. - Nerve in Zeitnot. Seven of your last ten wins were decided on the clock. You keep posing problems and rarely panic when both sides are under 10 seconds.
Recurring issues to address
- Time management. Relying on flagging cuts both ways: three recent losses (e.g. vs
cardenasdavid_2005andqwerreqwerre) happened with material near equality but the clock against you. Aim to reach move 25 with at least 40 % of your initial time. - End-game conversion. In the loss to
android_10you entered a rook-and-pawn ending objectively drawn, yet a single pawn push allowed mate. Build a habit of stopping-to-calculate when pieces come off the board, even if you feel “winning on the clock” is easier. - Loose king in attacking set-ups. Your favourite h-pawn thrusts (h4–h5) create initiative, but when they fail you often lack luft. The 24…Qa1# miniature against
insatiable27started with an ambitious g-pawn storm but ended with your king boxed in. Keep an eye on the back-rank flight square after launching pawns. - Central tension in Owen’s Defence loss. After 17…d5 you allowed …Rxc5/…Rfc8 and Black seized every open file. When you have an IQP or isolated pawn, remember the typical counter-play plan: piece activity before pawn pushes.
Action plan for the next two weeks
- Clock awareness drill. Play five 5|5 games where your only goal is to keep ≥60 seconds after move 20. Do not sacrifice accuracy; simply allocate time consciously.
- End-game mini-sessions. Each day solve three rook-and-pawn studies from 365Chess (filter “technical wins/draws”). Focus on the Philidor and Lucena techniques and the concept of the triangulation manoeuvre.
- Safe-king checklist. Before every pawn storm ask: “Can I create luft? Are opposite bishops on the board? Can the opponent swing a rook with tempo?” If any answer is “yes”, delay the pawn push by one move to insert a safety improvement (Kg1/h3, …Kh7/…g6, etc.).
- Review critical games. Load the following moments into your analysis board:
- Loss vs
qwerreqwerre, after 22…R5c7 – find a plan that keeps the c-file closed. - Win vs
itamar000, after 24…Rg8+ – investigate cleaner paths rather than playing for the flag. ()
- Loss vs
At-a-glance stats
Peak rapid rating: 2267 (2021-11-09)
Motivation corner
“Good positions don’t win games—good moves do.” Keep sharpening those moves, and the positions (and the clock) will follow!
See you at the board, and good luck in your next match against itamar000!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| grinick | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| jmzeut | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| mouravc | 1W / 4L / 0D | |
| Sahil Sinha | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| dragon670 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| alexparis76 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| duong_1199 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| arjunbharadwaj06 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| endmomcilo | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| don_giovanni_gali | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ariel Crawford | 5W / 10L / 0D | |
| ivanag | 6W / 8L / 0D | |
| Dusko Zmijanac | 4W / 7L / 0D | |
| elrope | 2W / 6L / 2D | |
| David Paulina | 5W / 4L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2422 | 2302 | 2237 | |
| 2024 | 2321 | 2314 | ||
| 2023 | 2312 | 2314 | 2236 | |
| 2022 | 2188 | 2150 | ||
| 2021 | 2220 | 2189 | ||
| 2020 | 2288 | |||
| 2019 | 2241 | |||
| 2018 | 2202 | |||
| 2017 | 2167 | |||
| 2016 | 2258 | |||
| 2015 | 2070 | 2000 | ||
| 2014 | 1970 | |||
| 2013 | 2045 | |||
| 2012 | 2026 | |||
| 2011 | 2063 | |||
| 2010 | 1599 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52W / 24L / 4D | 35W / 45L / 5D | 73.5 |
| 2024 | 290W / 204L / 48D | 252W / 242L / 44D | 73.6 |
| 2023 | 280W / 214L / 39D | 254W / 214L / 41D | 75.3 |
| 2022 | 231W / 186L / 36D | 212W / 211L / 24D | 72.0 |
| 2021 | 86W / 95L / 16D | 82W / 93L / 17D | 75.1 |
| 2020 | 3W / 1L / 0D | 4W / 0L / 1D | 79.3 |
| 2019 | 1W / 2L / 1D | 3W / 2L / 1D | 81.4 |
| 2018 | 16W / 21L / 6D | 19W / 17L / 1D | 74.4 |
| 2017 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 4L / 0D | 65.4 |
| 2016 | 37W / 24L / 1D | 28W / 34L / 2D | 67.7 |
| 2015 | 113W / 105L / 15D | 106W / 117L / 15D | 68.0 |
| 2014 | 78W / 82L / 12D | 67W / 94L / 7D | 69.4 |
| 2013 | 98W / 89L / 16D | 90W / 106L / 7D | 71.0 |
| 2012 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 1D | 55.0 |
| 2011 | 8W / 3L / 1D | 8W / 3L / 0D | 64.5 |
| 2010 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 3W / 0L / 0D | 49.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 235 | 131 | 89 | 15 | 55.7% |
| French Defense | 195 | 108 | 76 | 11 | 55.4% |
| Scotch Game | 162 | 81 | 69 | 12 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 134 | 81 | 42 | 11 | 60.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 134 | 67 | 54 | 13 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 130 | 71 | 48 | 11 | 54.6% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 109 | 54 | 49 | 6 | 49.5% |
| Four Knights Game | 108 | 48 | 48 | 12 | 44.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack | 108 | 45 | 51 | 12 | 41.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 94 | 46 | 44 | 4 | 48.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 15 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| French Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense Accepted | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Boleslavsky Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 6 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |