Ludvig Carlsson: The International Master with a Blitzing Flair
Once upon a chessboard, in the realm of pawns and knights, emerged Ludvig Carlsson — a formidable International Master recognized by FIDE, known far and wide by the username CarlssonLudvig.
From the early days of 2015, Ludvig started his blitz journey with an average rating hovering around 1586, steadily climbing the ranks with a rapid-fire collection of wins. By 2024, this chess speedster dazzled the online chess world with a peak blitz rating surpassing 2870, and bullet rating soaring close to 2800 — a rating more commonly seen in secret chess vaults than typical ladders.
Whether it's the split-second decisions of bullet chess or the tactical warfare of blitz, Ludvig's games reveal a brain finely tuned to rapid calculation and psychological endurance. Speaking of psychology, his tilt factor clocked in at 144 — meaning Ludvig sometimes tilts like a dueling grandmaster who just spilled their coffee, but bounces back with a Spotify playlist of killer comeback moves. In fact, with a stunning 75% comeback rate and an almost mythical 95.7% win rate after losing a piece, this player turns adversity into opportunity faster than you can say "checkmate."
One might wonder if Ludvig ever surrenders early. Not often: pretty much only about 8% of the time, proving he’s no quitter. The average game length hovers around 66 moves for wins — certainly not a quick fling but a well-fought marathon of mind games. With white pieces, Ludvig has a cool 56% win rate, showing extra prowess when taking the initiative, while gritting out over 50% when playing black.
Statistically, Ludvig's favorite time to play seems to be between the hours of 1 AM and 7 PM, where his win rate dances between an enviable 50% and 56%, suggesting a nocturnal grandmaster’s knack for late-night brilliance or solid afternoon grinding.
With over 7,000 wins in blitz alone, countless battles conquered under timed pressure, and a legendary longest winning streak of 60 games, Ludvig Carlsson is a testament to perseverance, speed, and strategy on the chess battlefield. Opponents beware: you're not just facing a master of pawns and pieces, but a relentless tactician and comeback king.
When Ludvig isn’t plotting his next victory, he might be found casually defeating casual players or whispering secrets to his rook — but one thing’s for sure: in the digital battleground of chess, Ludvig Carlsson is an IM who blitzes beyond boundaries.
Hi Ludvig, here’s some focused feedback to help you push past the 2630-range wall.
Your Key Strengths
- Opening versatility. You comfortably switch between Petroff, Caro-Kann and English setups as Black while steering Rossolimo, French-rubinstein and King’s-Indian-Attack structures as White. Opponents cannot prepare easily.
- Initiative hunter. In several wins you sacrificed material (e.g. 15.Nd5! vs justforpractice-0_0) to seize dynamic play; your conversion speed is excellent once the initiative is secured.
- Control of critical files. You frequently triple on d- and e-files (games vs SebaGiacomelli and PrinzKoksvonderGasanstalt), showing strong understanding of central tension.
- Good practical sense in sharp endings. Converting the French endgame with 65.b8=Q+ 67.Qa4# under a minute was exemplary.
Recurring Improvement Themes
1. Early pawn-moves that create dark-square weaknesses
Losses to gogodomi (…g6, …c6 Caro-Kann) and icltspmosmong (…c5 break too early) show that hasty …g6/…g5 operations left f6 & h6 soft. Before advancing wing pawns, run a 10-second checklist:
- King safety: can White open the g- or h- file within three moves?
- Piece cooperation: do both bishops and the queen participate in the expansion or will you fight with half an army?
2. Converting long technical advantages
Against joghurt1 you mis-evaluated a safe exchange sacrifice on c6 and resigned from a position that Stockfish assesses only –0.8. Build an endgame drill routine (10 puzzles/day) focusing on rook + minor-piece vs rook positions to strengthen patience when the tactic frenzy is over.
3. Time management & tilt control
You lost twice on time in equal or better positions (vs julian2024 & joghurt1). Average remaining time at move 25 in wins: 1:37 in losses: 0:28. Try a soft time-cap: never let the clock dip below 45 seconds before move 20 unless the position is a forced line.
4. Knight vs bishop choices
The loss vs icltspmosmong highlighted difficulty transitioning from middlegame to minor-piece endgame after 17…Be5. Analyse this miniature in depth with a focus on “bad bishop vs good knight” concepts and the importance of pawn anchors on dark squares.
Tailored Opening Tweaks
| Current weapon | Low-effort upgrade |
|---|---|
| Petroff 3…Nxe4 | Mix in 3…d6 to avoid early Nd3+ tricks and keep opponents guessing. |
| Caro-Kann Exchange | Add 6…Bf5 7.Nf3 e6 8.Bf4 Nd7 avoiding slow …g6. |
| Rossolimo with 6.c3 | Study the modern 6…d6 sidelines; you scored 100 % vs …g6 but only 50 % when Black chose …e5 structures. |
Recommended Weekly Training Plan (2 hrs/day)
- 30 min Tactical motifs: fork, deflection & zwischenzug → goal: +10 rating on Puzzle Rush survival.
- 20 min Endgame fundamentals: rook endings & opposite-colour bishops.
- 30 min Opening deep dive: one tabiya per day, 15 moves of engine-checked notes.
- 20 min Annotate one of your rapid or blitz losses without engine, then compare.
- 20 min Practical: play 3 games at 3+2 strictly applying the 45-second time-cap rule.
Progress Tracking
Peak Blitz rating: 2872 (2024-11-11)
Hourly performance:
Day-to-day trends:
Mindset Nugget
Remember Garry’s rule: “If you have a choice between two good moves, spend the time deciding which plan you prefer, not which move is prettier.”
Good luck in your push to 2700, and feel free to send me any game you’d like annotated more deeply!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gugutkica | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| deniss_dunaveckis | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| benoni_player | 10W / 1L / 1D | View |
| dennischess960 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| danzha | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| godzillachessyoutube | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| suraj240704 | 2W / 1L / 2D | View |
| 878768 878768 | 0W / 0L / 2D | View |
| Nikola Mitkov | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| veganforfuture | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| arvin2005 | 102W / 41L / 8D | View Games |
| WarlordX | 32W / 31L / 5D | View Games |
| benne2003 | 42W / 10L / 9D | View Games |
| Elham Amar | 8W / 33L / 3D | View Games |
| Owen McCoy | 15W / 18L / 7D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2792 | 2770 | 2471 | 1532 |
| 2024 | 2773 | 2710 | 2465 | |
| 2023 | 2679 | 2697 | 2331 | |
| 2022 | 2591 | 2631 | 2404 | |
| 2021 | 2568 | 2584 | 2288 | 1526 |
| 2020 | 2531 | 1823 | 2327 | 1280 |
| 2019 | 2405 | 2422 | 2124 | 986 |
| 2018 | 2245 | 2224 | 1902 | 958 |
| 2017 | 1988 | 2162 | 1494 | 732 |
| 2016 | 1879 | 1776 | 1627 | 824 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 306W / 157L / 48D | 254W / 196L / 55D | 92.5 |
| 2024 | 267W / 153L / 75D | 238W / 191L / 70D | 90.7 |
| 2023 | 95W / 97L / 27D | 91W / 102L / 24D | 90.2 |
| 2022 | 192W / 127L / 35D | 184W / 141L / 42D | 72.0 |
| 2021 | 362W / 221L / 49D | 324W / 233L / 52D | 82.4 |
| 2020 | 454W / 301L / 51D | 411W / 328L / 62D | 83.0 |
| 2019 | 998W / 701L / 135D | 934W / 805L / 110D | 71.2 |
| 2018 | 1329W / 760L / 109D | 1181W / 938L / 96D | 65.6 |
| 2017 | 656W / 480L / 62D | 607W / 568L / 51D | 58.3 |
| 2016 | 1213W / 956L / 80D | 1114W / 1079L / 85D | 56.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 825 | 493 | 331 | 1 | 59.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 375 | 208 | 141 | 26 | 55.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 363 | 196 | 145 | 22 | 54.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 362 | 198 | 134 | 30 | 54.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 326 | 188 | 112 | 26 | 57.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 298 | 159 | 117 | 22 | 53.4% |
| Petrov's Defense | 295 | 148 | 118 | 29 | 50.2% |
| Australian Defense | 285 | 140 | 125 | 20 | 49.1% |
| Modern | 268 | 147 | 110 | 11 | 54.9% |
| Döry Defense | 241 | 121 | 93 | 27 | 50.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 235 | 141 | 82 | 12 | 60.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 225 | 128 | 85 | 12 | 56.9% |
| Australian Defense | 181 | 101 | 74 | 6 | 55.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 162 | 88 | 63 | 11 | 54.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 121 | 58 | 51 | 12 | 47.9% |
| Czech Defense | 113 | 59 | 47 | 7 | 52.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 112 | 65 | 42 | 5 | 58.0% |
| French Defense | 111 | 69 | 39 | 3 | 62.2% |
| Modern | 99 | 54 | 42 | 3 | 54.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 98 | 50 | 40 | 8 | 51.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Petrov's Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 92 | 49 | 43 | 0 | 53.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 90 | 55 | 35 | 0 | 61.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 87 | 52 | 34 | 1 | 59.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 80 | 60 | 20 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 77 | 41 | 36 | 0 | 53.2% |
| French Defense | 71 | 30 | 41 | 0 | 42.2% |
| Czech Defense | 64 | 22 | 42 | 0 | 34.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 62 | 26 | 36 | 0 | 41.9% |
| Australian Defense | 60 | 36 | 24 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 51 | 32 | 19 | 0 | 62.8% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 60 | 1 |
| Losing | 144 | 0 |