Profile of CaroExpert
CaroExpert is a dedicated chess enthusiast who has shown remarkable progress across multiple time controls since 2016. Initially competing around the mid- to high-1400s in Blitz, they steadily climbed into the mid-2000s and beyond, even surpassing a 2700+ peak Blitz rating by 2024. Their Rapid journey, starting at 1200 in 2020 and reaching 2200 within two years, highlights their ability to adapt quickly and consistently perform at a high level. In Bullet, they made a leap from a modest 1033 rating in 2016 to over 2100, with a best performance at 2171.
True to the name “CaroExpert,” they rely heavily on the Caro-Kann Defense, regularly employing its Classical and Advance variations. Their preference for structured, solid setups also appears in frequent Queen’s Gambit Declined and London System lines. Collectively, CaroExpert’s repertoire demonstrates a deep appreciation for strategic play, especially in endgames—reflected by their high endgame frequency of nearly 76%. This measured style complements a strong resolve: they boast a high comeback rate of over 80% and successfully convert many positions even after material losses.
CaroExpert’s record includes over 3,000 Blitz wins and a strong tilt resilience, with only a small share of one-sided losses. They are comfortable playing both White and Black; their White win rate stands at 51.67%, while their achievements with Black reach 48.11%. Known to push games into deeper phases, CaroExpert has an average of around 70 moves per win and a flair for battling through the entire board. Whether in casual or rated events, their determined and balanced approach makes CaroExpert a formidable and ever-improving opponent in the chess world.
Overview of the recent bullet games
Your recent results show a mix of sharp execution and learning opportunities. In the most recent win, you successfully converted activity and pressure into a clean finish. In the loss, you ran into time pressure and a dynamic attack from your opponent, and in the draw, you faced sustained pressure that kept the position balanced but demanding. The common thread is that quick, purposeful decisions and solid defensive technique will help you convert more of these complex moments into wins.
What you did well
- Active piece coordination and king safety in the winning game helped you seize the initiative and keep your opponent under pressure.
- Effective rook activity on open files contributed to practical threats and forced mistakes or concessions from your opponent.
- Resilience in defense when faced with aggressive play, keeping the game humanly resolvable even in tight spots.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in bullet games: allocate thinking time more evenly and practice sticking to a simple plan during the clock. A practical approach is to assign a quick, high-priority plan for each phase of the game and try to move with a steady rhythm to avoid large time deficits.
- Endgame technique: work on converting advantages into wins and on defending better when material is imbalanced. Regularly review king-and-rook endings, as well as simple pawn endings, to build confidence under time pressure.
- Tactical awareness and pattern recognition: sharpen ability to spot themes like back-rank pressure, double attacks, and forcing moves. This will help you capitalize on opportunities sooner and avoid getting tangled in equal-position complexities.
- Openings and middlegame planning: while you have some strong lines, continue developing a concise, repeatable plan for your main openings so you’re not improvising under time pressure. Focus on a couple of core setups you enjoy and study typical responses from common defenses.
Opening performance notes
You’ve shown strength in several lines, with notable results in certain setups. For example, your performance in lines related to the Queen's Indian/Indian family of openings has been solid in practice sessions, and other lines such as the English/Nimzo-Larsen family demonstrate high win rates in your data. To solidify your results, consider deepening your understanding of the key middlegame plans that arise from your preferred openings. If you want to review a specific opening, see Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation or English Opening: Agincourt Defense for focused ideas and typical middle-game plans. You can also explore openings like Döry Defense or Nimzo-Larsen Attack to broaden your practical repertoire.]]
Practice plan and next steps
- Time-management sprint: play short bullet sessions (3+0 or 1+1) and aim to finish with meaningful time remaining. After each session, spend 10 minutes reviewing where you could have saved time on noncritical moves.
- Endgame routine: practice 10 straightforward king-and-rook endings per week to improve conversion and defense in simplified positions.
- Opening study blocks: dedicate 20–30 minutes daily to your primary openings, reinforcing typical middlegame plans, common replies from opponents, and standard strategic ideas.
- Tactical pattern drills: include 15 minutes of daily puzzles focused on motifs you’ve encountered in your bullet games, such as back-rank threats, tactical trades to simplify favorable positions, and forcing sequences.
Notes and optional references
If you want to review specific games against particular opponents, you can check the profiles of your recent rivals, for example Sambit Panda or rokodaime, to study their common ideas and responses. If you’d like deeper opening guidance, you can explore noteworthy themes in Queen's Indian Defense or Nimzo-Larsen Attack to reinforce your understanding of typical plans and tactic ideas.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Aleksandar Indjic | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Piotr Jagodzinski | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Dawid Czerw | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| enzofavara | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| timofeirybakov | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Lalarttu86 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Emilio Profili | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| silvermiracle | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| chesssknock | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Nico Georgiadis | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rokodaime | 78W / 100L / 8D | View Games |
| Bitunilsu | 49W / 35L / 3D | View Games |
| Swayangsu Satyapragyan | 19W / 45L / 11D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 20W / 30L / 2D | View Games |
| Alan Stein | 17W / 13L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2171 | 2793 | 2223 | |
| 2024 | 2582 | |||
| 2023 | 2595 | |||
| 2022 | 2412 | 2200 | ||
| 2021 | 2044 | 2494 | 1687 | |
| 2020 | 2024 | 1899 | 1200 | |
| 2018 | 1832 | |||
| 2017 | 1734 | |||
| 2016 | 1033 | 1631 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 463W / 440L / 56D | 428W / 477L / 54D | 86.6 |
| 2024 | 296W / 298L / 27D | 277W / 310L / 39D | 82.1 |
| 2023 | 173W / 141L / 15D | 164W / 146L / 14D | 78.0 |
| 2022 | 622W / 502L / 63D | 571W / 539L / 74D | 77.4 |
| 2021 | 237W / 156L / 17D | 208W / 160L / 32D | 76.8 |
| 2020 | 148W / 145L / 12D | 143W / 136L / 11D | 27.5 |
| 2018 | 3W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 1L / 0D | 68.0 |
| 2017 | 9W / 4L / 1D | 8W / 7L / 1D | 67.5 |
| 2016 | 31W / 24L / 6D | 27W / 32L / 1D | 59.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 6.Nf3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1040 | 546 | 451 | 43 | 52.5% |
| Unknown | 373 | 170 | 199 | 4 | 45.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 337 | 162 | 158 | 17 | 48.1% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 221 | 103 | 100 | 18 | 46.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 205 | 108 | 83 | 14 | 52.7% |
| Australian Defense | 200 | 105 | 84 | 11 | 52.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 192 | 97 | 84 | 11 | 50.5% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 182 | 81 | 87 | 14 | 44.5% |
| Döry Defense | 180 | 92 | 75 | 13 | 51.1% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 146 | 68 | 67 | 11 | 46.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 23 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 65.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 17 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 35.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Döry Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 1 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |