Avatar of Mihael Ankerst

Mihael Ankerst FM

Username: CarrotsandPizza

Playing Since: 2019-04-04 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Rapid: 2331
2W / 2L / 1D
Blitz: 2549
15667W / 17225L / 1440D
Bullet: 2028
13873W / 14454L / 532D

Chess Player Profile: CarrotsandPizza

Carrotsandpizza is a dynamic chess competitor whose journey spans several years of steadily evolving performance. With a career that features spirited battles in Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid formats, this player has demonstrated both resilience and adaptability at the board. His ratings over time have reflected a persistent pursuit of improvement; in Blitz, his scores have climbed from the mid-2200s to peaks above 2500, while his Rapid results – highlighted by a 2331 peak – reveal a blend of tactical acumen and strategic maturation.

Known for frequently steering games into deep endgames (with an endgame frequency of about 81.7%), CarrotsandPizza is not only comfortable with complex transitions but also shows a remarkable ability to mount comebacks. His tactical awareness is evident from an exceptional comeback rate of nearly 87% and an uncanny 100% win rate in situations where he is temporarily a piece down. This resilience on the board, however, is balanced by a modest early resignation rate, hinting at an understanding of when the position has become objectively lost.

In addition to raw tactical skill, his time performance reveals a thoughtful approach to pacing his games. Analysis shows that his best results often come around mid‐morning, with win rates peaking in the 50% range during the 9–11 AM hours. His game outcomes vary slightly by day of the week, with performances hovering in the mid-40% zone, reflecting both consistency and a willingness to adapt his style to different temporal and psychological conditions.

From a psychological perspective, CarrotsandPizza’s tilt factor is relatively low, suggesting that even in challenging moments he can maintain composure. There is a notable difference in his performance between rated and casual matches, which indicates that he places high value on precision and alertness when the stakes are high.

Overall, CarrotsandPizza’s career is a testament to a player who has honed his skills over time, regularly calibrating his style across formats while remaining tactically resourceful. His journey at the board serves as an inspiring model for any chess enthusiast aiming for continuous growth in competitive environments.


Coach Chesswick's Profile Photo
Coach Chesswick

What you’re doing well

You’ve shown a solid ability to develop pieces and keep your king safe in rapid games. In your winning encounter, you opened with a standard king-pawn move, developed knights and bishops smoothly, and used your rooks along open files to create pressure on the opponent’s position. You also demonstrated tenacity by maintaining activity and finishing with a tactical finish when opportunities appeared.

  • You continue to fight for active play rather than settling for passive positions, which helps you keep chances in dynamic middlegames.
  • Your ability to coordinate pieces after development—bringing rooks into central files and using your queen to threaten key squares—shows good practical understanding in sharp sequences.
  • In the draw and the loss, you remained fighting and did not rush to convert every position; you looked for counter chances and tried to complicate when appropriate.

Key areas to improve

  • Opening-to-middlegame planning: In some games, the middlegame plan becomes unclear after the first moves. Focus on a simple, repeatable plan after your opening, so you know what your pieces are aiming for (e.g., control of the center, pressure on a specific file, or targeting a weak pawn) rather than trading into a neutral position.
  • Endgame conversion: When you gain a small initiative, work on converting it into a win. Practice common endgame transitions so you can maintain pressure longer and reduce draws when you have a slight edge.
  • Calculation discipline: In tactical or sharp moments, improve your ability to verify safety after each forcing line. Look for two or three candidate continuations and check for checks, captures, and threats to your own king before committing.
  • Time-management in rapid: Avoid spending excessive time on earlier moves when the plan is not yet clear. Develop a practical time budget (for example, a quick 10–12 moves in the opening, with a plan to simplify or switch plans if the position stays unclear) so you have time for deeper calculation in critical middlegame moments.

Two-week practical plan

  • Choose a small, reliable white repertoire (two openings) and a straightforward black response (one or two solid defenses). Learn the typical middlegame plans for those choices and practice the key ideas in sample games.
  • Do daily tactics training (15–20 minutes) focused on recognizing forcing sequences and short tactical motifs like pins, skewers, and discovered attacks.
  • Block out 20–30 minutes for endgame basics each week (rook endings, king-and-pawn endings, and simple rook- vs-rook endgames). Practice converting small advantages into wins.
  • Review every game quickly after playing: identify one critical moment where you could have chosen a clearer plan or avoided a risky line, and write down a single improvement for the next game.

Suggested study focus

  • Pattern recognition in tactics: solve puzzles that emphasize checks and captures in the middlegame.
  • Endgame fundamentals: practice rook endgames and simple pawn endgames until you can push a plan confidently.
  • Opening planning: pick two openings you enjoy and study the typical middlegame ideas, not just the move orders. Learn how to transition from the opening into a concrete plan for the middlegame.

Encouraging mindset

You are making steady progress and showing resilience in tricky positions. Keep building a compact, repeatable plan you can rely on in the first 15 moves, and balance calculation with practical play. With consistent practice on the areas above, you should see noticeable improvements in your next few weeks of rapid play.



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
vatoloco81 0W / 1L / 0D View
berndfried 0W / 2L / 0D View
Orbog 1W / 2L / 0D View
pale007 0W / 1L / 0D View
marcin110987 1W / 2L / 0D View
legamer125 0W / 1L / 0D View
diego_yokohama_chess 1W / 2L / 0D View
reddogpt 8W / 8L / 1D View
1luizedu 1W / 2L / 0D View
2strongxu 2W / 0L / 0D View
Most Played Opponents
Burikabu Chichikoko 69W / 63L / 3D View Games
kamran SHIRAZI 40W / 88L / 3D View Games
sagarmatha977 62W / 60L / 3D View Games
matukin_igor 63W / 41L / 5D View Games
raller 54W / 51L / 2D View Games

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 2108 2541
2024 2321 2550
2023 2342 2331
2022 2344
2021 2123 2415
2020 1997 2397
2019 1998 2256 1953
Rating by Year201920202021202220232024202525501953YearRatingBulletBlitzRapid

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 3378W / 3527L / 145D 3393W / 3497L / 148D 70.1
2024 2326W / 2396L / 175D 2137W / 2598L / 155D 75.6
2023 2143W / 2332L / 172D 2185W / 2280L / 200D 77.2
2022 2679W / 2940L / 241D 2590W / 3032L / 256D 78.5
2021 1429W / 1574L / 139D 1432W / 1634L / 137D 78.0
2020 15W / 15L / 1D 12W / 16L / 1D 68.0
2019 1591W / 1489L / 48D 1559W / 1505L / 55D 69.7

Openings: Most Played

Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation 4113 1963 2006 144 47.7%
Amar Gambit 1547 659 817 71 42.6%
Four Knights Game 1176 608 490 78 51.7%
Sicilian Defense: Closed 1102 506 562 34 45.9%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 1028 441 539 48 42.9%
Caro-Kann Defense 997 422 550 25 42.3%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 962 411 512 39 42.7%
King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation 809 407 364 38 50.3%
King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation 784 381 354 49 48.6%
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit 775 364 375 36 47.0%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 3404 1652 1693 59 48.5%
Amar Gambit 2134 1071 1025 38 50.2%
Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation 1994 1011 949 34 50.7%
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit 889 436 432 21 49.0%
Sicilian Defense: Closed 844 386 447 11 45.7%
East Indian Defense 702 326 365 11 46.4%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 670 329 329 12 49.1%
Caro-Kann Defense 663 297 354 12 44.8%
Modern 572 275 289 8 48.1%
Scandinavian Defense 549 273 259 17 49.7%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Bird Opening 4 2 2 0 50.0%
Barnes Opening: Walkerling 4 2 2 0 50.0%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 3 1 2 0 33.3%
Barnes Defense 3 1 1 1 33.3%
Australian Defense 2 1 1 0 50.0%
English Opening: Symmetrical Variation 2 1 0 1 50.0%
Sicilian Defense 2 1 1 0 50.0%
Bishop's Opening 1 0 1 0 0.0%
Modern Defense 1 0 1 0 0.0%
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit 1 0 1 0 0.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 17 0
Losing 18 2
🐞 Report a Problem