Chess Player Profile: CarrotsandPizza
Carrotsandpizza is a dynamic chess competitor whose journey spans several years of steadily evolving performance. With a career that features spirited battles in Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid formats, this player has demonstrated both resilience and adaptability at the board. His ratings over time have reflected a persistent pursuit of improvement; in Blitz, his scores have climbed from the mid-2200s to peaks above 2500, while his Rapid results – highlighted by a 2331 peak – reveal a blend of tactical acumen and strategic maturation.
Known for frequently steering games into deep endgames (with an endgame frequency of about 81.7%), CarrotsandPizza is not only comfortable with complex transitions but also shows a remarkable ability to mount comebacks. His tactical awareness is evident from an exceptional comeback rate of nearly 87% and an uncanny 100% win rate in situations where he is temporarily a piece down. This resilience on the board, however, is balanced by a modest early resignation rate, hinting at an understanding of when the position has become objectively lost.
In addition to raw tactical skill, his time performance reveals a thoughtful approach to pacing his games. Analysis shows that his best results often come around mid‐morning, with win rates peaking in the 50% range during the 9–11 AM hours. His game outcomes vary slightly by day of the week, with performances hovering in the mid-40% zone, reflecting both consistency and a willingness to adapt his style to different temporal and psychological conditions.
From a psychological perspective, CarrotsandPizza’s tilt factor is relatively low, suggesting that even in challenging moments he can maintain composure. There is a notable difference in his performance between rated and casual matches, which indicates that he places high value on precision and alertness when the stakes are high.
Overall, CarrotsandPizza’s career is a testament to a player who has honed his skills over time, regularly calibrating his style across formats while remaining tactically resourceful. His journey at the board serves as an inspiring model for any chess enthusiast aiming for continuous growth in competitive environments.
What you’re doing well
You’ve shown a solid ability to develop pieces and keep your king safe in rapid games. In your winning encounter, you opened with a standard king-pawn move, developed knights and bishops smoothly, and used your rooks along open files to create pressure on the opponent’s position. You also demonstrated tenacity by maintaining activity and finishing with a tactical finish when opportunities appeared.
- You continue to fight for active play rather than settling for passive positions, which helps you keep chances in dynamic middlegames.
- Your ability to coordinate pieces after development—bringing rooks into central files and using your queen to threaten key squares—shows good practical understanding in sharp sequences.
- In the draw and the loss, you remained fighting and did not rush to convert every position; you looked for counter chances and tried to complicate when appropriate.
Key areas to improve
- Opening-to-middlegame planning: In some games, the middlegame plan becomes unclear after the first moves. Focus on a simple, repeatable plan after your opening, so you know what your pieces are aiming for (e.g., control of the center, pressure on a specific file, or targeting a weak pawn) rather than trading into a neutral position.
- Endgame conversion: When you gain a small initiative, work on converting it into a win. Practice common endgame transitions so you can maintain pressure longer and reduce draws when you have a slight edge.
- Calculation discipline: In tactical or sharp moments, improve your ability to verify safety after each forcing line. Look for two or three candidate continuations and check for checks, captures, and threats to your own king before committing.
- Time-management in rapid: Avoid spending excessive time on earlier moves when the plan is not yet clear. Develop a practical time budget (for example, a quick 10–12 moves in the opening, with a plan to simplify or switch plans if the position stays unclear) so you have time for deeper calculation in critical middlegame moments.
Two-week practical plan
- Choose a small, reliable white repertoire (two openings) and a straightforward black response (one or two solid defenses). Learn the typical middlegame plans for those choices and practice the key ideas in sample games.
- Do daily tactics training (15–20 minutes) focused on recognizing forcing sequences and short tactical motifs like pins, skewers, and discovered attacks.
- Block out 20–30 minutes for endgame basics each week (rook endings, king-and-pawn endings, and simple rook- vs-rook endgames). Practice converting small advantages into wins.
- Review every game quickly after playing: identify one critical moment where you could have chosen a clearer plan or avoided a risky line, and write down a single improvement for the next game.
Suggested study focus
- Pattern recognition in tactics: solve puzzles that emphasize checks and captures in the middlegame.
- Endgame fundamentals: practice rook endgames and simple pawn endgames until you can push a plan confidently.
- Opening planning: pick two openings you enjoy and study the typical middlegame ideas, not just the move orders. Learn how to transition from the opening into a concrete plan for the middlegame.
Encouraging mindset
You are making steady progress and showing resilience in tricky positions. Keep building a compact, repeatable plan you can rely on in the first 15 moves, and balance calculation with practical play. With consistent practice on the areas above, you should see noticeable improvements in your next few weeks of rapid play.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| vatoloco81 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| berndfried | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Orbog | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| pale007 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| marcin110987 | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| legamer125 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| diego_yokohama_chess | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| reddogpt | 8W / 8L / 1D | View |
| 1luizedu | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| 2strongxu | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Burikabu Chichikoko | 69W / 63L / 3D | View Games |
| kamran SHIRAZI | 40W / 88L / 3D | View Games |
| sagarmatha977 | 62W / 60L / 3D | View Games |
| matukin_igor | 63W / 41L / 5D | View Games |
| raller | 54W / 51L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2108 | 2541 | ||
| 2024 | 2321 | 2550 | ||
| 2023 | 2342 | 2331 | ||
| 2022 | 2344 | |||
| 2021 | 2123 | 2415 | ||
| 2020 | 1997 | 2397 | ||
| 2019 | 1998 | 2256 | 1953 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3378W / 3527L / 145D | 3393W / 3497L / 148D | 70.1 |
| 2024 | 2326W / 2396L / 175D | 2137W / 2598L / 155D | 75.6 |
| 2023 | 2143W / 2332L / 172D | 2185W / 2280L / 200D | 77.2 |
| 2022 | 2679W / 2940L / 241D | 2590W / 3032L / 256D | 78.5 |
| 2021 | 1429W / 1574L / 139D | 1432W / 1634L / 137D | 78.0 |
| 2020 | 15W / 15L / 1D | 12W / 16L / 1D | 68.0 |
| 2019 | 1591W / 1489L / 48D | 1559W / 1505L / 55D | 69.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 4113 | 1963 | 2006 | 144 | 47.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 1547 | 659 | 817 | 71 | 42.6% |
| Four Knights Game | 1176 | 608 | 490 | 78 | 51.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1102 | 506 | 562 | 34 | 45.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1028 | 441 | 539 | 48 | 42.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 997 | 422 | 550 | 25 | 42.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 962 | 411 | 512 | 39 | 42.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 809 | 407 | 364 | 38 | 50.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 784 | 381 | 354 | 49 | 48.6% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 775 | 364 | 375 | 36 | 47.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3404 | 1652 | 1693 | 59 | 48.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 2134 | 1071 | 1025 | 38 | 50.2% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1994 | 1011 | 949 | 34 | 50.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 889 | 436 | 432 | 21 | 49.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 844 | 386 | 447 | 11 | 45.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 702 | 326 | 365 | 11 | 46.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 670 | 329 | 329 | 12 | 49.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 663 | 297 | 354 | 12 | 44.8% |
| Modern | 572 | 275 | 289 | 8 | 48.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 549 | 273 | 259 | 17 | 49.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bishop's Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 18 | 2 |