Casper Liu - The FIDE Master with a Bullet Cannon
Casper Liu, proudly holding the esteemed title of FIDE Master, is a chess player who makes the 64 squares his playground and blitzes opponents faster than you can say "checkmate". Specializing in bullet chess, Casper’s rating soared from a humble 1800 in 2019 to a striking peak of 2768 in 2024 — a rapid ascent matched only by their lightning-fast reflexes and uncanny tactical awareness.
Speed Demon on the Board
With over 1,000 bullet games played in the last few years alone and a winning rate exceeding 64%, Casper thrives in the fastest time controls, delivering sharp strikes with legendary openings that remain top secret (because, well, you're just not allowed to know). Their current winning streak might be a modest two games, but don’t let that fool you — they once racked up an 18-game winning streak, leaving bewildered opponents wondering if Casper secretly installed a chess engine in their brain.
The Tactical Genius
Casper’s playstyle combines deep endgame knowledge (appearing in over 72% of their games), patience (the average win takes around 68 moves), and an almost supernatural comeback ability, winning nearly 82% of games after facing serious adversity. Lose a piece? No problem—Casper’s win rate after losing material is an astonishing 94%. Opponents beware: resignation is rarely on the menu here, with early resignations under 8%, showcasing a fighter’s heart.
A Gamer with a Psychological Edge (and Some Quirks)
Though Casper occasionally tilts (with a tilt factor of 10), their overall rated-vs-casual win difference is only a few percentage points, proving that nerves are just another piece to manipulate. They favor playing with White, winning over 54% of those games, but don't be complacent when playing Black — Casper has nearly a 50% win rate there, too.
Chess Life Beyond the Board
When not dazzling fans with breathtaking tactical shots and razor-sharp bullet games, Casper enjoys the strategic nuances of rapid and blitz formats, consistently pushing ratings into the mid-2500s. Their diverse opening repertoire keeps the opposition guessing, and their list of prolific opponents reads like a who's-who of online chess — from loyal rival "myburger" to mysterious dragons of the night labeled "anton_demchenko".
Whether you're a casual player seeking inspiration or a seasoned chess enthusiast, Casper Liu’s journey is a testament to dedication, speed, and a sprinkle of chess magic. Just beware if you catch them online with the clock ticking — they might just outblitz you in style, with a wink and a winning grin.
Hi Casper – performance overview
In your latest Titled-Tuesday run you scored +6 / -6 against an average opposition of 2400+. Your current personal best is 2602 (2024-10-08). The raw numbers (see
and ) confirm steady strength, but they also reveal a dip whenever the session passes the 60-minute mark – evidence of fatigue and zeitnot.What you are already doing very well
- Opening range & flexibility. You handled Slav, Catalan, King’s Indian and Modern structures from both sides – opponents cannot predict you easily.
- Tactical alertness. The exchange-sac 20…
Qxb2!! vslluissand the multi-purpose manoeuvreNd8–c6–xe7in your win over Blas Lugo show excellent calculation under pressure. - Creating practical problems. Even against 2800-rated Zbigniew Pakleza you generated queenside tension and forced him to find only moves.
Recurring issues holding you back
- Clock management. Five of the six losses were in positions that Stockfish evaluates between ‑0.3 and +0.5 just before the blunder. You routinely drop below 15 s with 25-30 moves still to play.
- Transition to endgames. In the Catalan loss to
dorsa_gh2014you were objectively equal after 24…Nbd5, but queens were traded without a clear plan and the a-pawn run cost you. Similar story in the East-Indian endgame vsPatrykB8. - Conversion discipline. After winning material you sometimes keep seeking new tactics instead of simplifying (e.g. 31…
Ra1vslluisswas fine, but 35…Ra1let the passer live three moves longer).
Targeted training plan
- Clock handling routine (7-10 days).
• Play five blitz games/day with the personal rule “move by 20 s”. • Review only the final 30 s of each game – train muscle memory for safe moves. • Switch to 3 + 2 once every two days; randomness forces faster decisions. - Endgame pattern pack (2 weeks).
• Revisit rook+passer vs rook and opposite-colour bishops – they appeared in three of Monday’s games.
• Solve 15 studies that end in zugzwang; it sharpens your feel for prophylaxis when simplifying. - Opening tightening (continuous).
• Against the Pirc/Modern, cut the earlyh4-h5plan unless the pawn can be supported – two losses followed that script. • Prepare a calm anti-…b5line in the Catalan so 6……b5doesn’t lure you into excessive pawn grabs. - Weekly self-review.
• Pick one win and one loss, strip engines, and write a three-sentence narrative: “Critical moment – My choice – Better choice.” • Keep the notes; after four weeks patterns will pop out.
Quick reference from your latest highlight
Slav Exchange vs Miamichess (excerpt)
31.Nxe6 Nc4 32.a4 bxa4 33.Rc8+! …
You used activity, not material, as the deciding factor – bottle that instinct, then marry it with stricter time discipline and cleaner endings. 2600+ is within reach.
Good luck and enjoy the grind! – Coach Bot
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Michał Kopczyński | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Deniz Anakok | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| desni93 | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| dixit_nikhil | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| purpleunicorn2853 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Hamidreza Ebrahimi Herab | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| slawomir_kurpiewski | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| smiechu | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| sn2022s | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| thebigsilas132 | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vitus Bondo Medhus | 37W / 18L / 4D | |
| Lukas Iskos | 34W / 14L / 1D | |
| pauliukevicius | 21W / 16L / 0D | |
| karlemilelmer | 18W / 14L / 0D | |
| viggohilbert | 18W / 0L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2739 | 2690 | 1763 | |
| 2024 | 2700 | 2546 | 1763 | |
| 2023 | 2485 | 2456 | 2227 | 1758 |
| 2022 | 2527 | 2403 | 1828 | |
| 2021 | 2400 | 1970 | 1682 | 1758 |
| 2020 | 2228 | 2099 | 1948 | |
| 2019 | 2080 | 2132 | 1962 | 1606 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 98W / 56L / 13D | 84W / 68L / 11D | 82.3 |
| 2024 | 233W / 173L / 29D | 217W / 180L / 27D | 73.8 |
| 2023 | 191W / 185L / 28D | 165W / 214L / 21D | 74.2 |
| 2022 | 58W / 41L / 4D | 63W / 52L / 2D | 59.9 |
| 2021 | 136W / 62L / 5D | 120W / 68L / 13D | 62.6 |
| 2020 | 12W / 5L / 0D | 7W / 11L / 0D | 59.5 |
| 2019 | 57W / 45L / 7D | 61W / 43L / 5D | 67.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 140 | 71 | 61 | 8 | 50.7% |
| Unknown | 124 | 62 | 62 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 110 | 56 | 48 | 6 | 50.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 98 | 46 | 46 | 6 | 46.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 89 | 45 | 40 | 4 | 50.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 74 | 40 | 28 | 6 | 54.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 61 | 26 | 31 | 4 | 42.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 55 | 32 | 19 | 4 | 58.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 48 | 28 | 19 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 47 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 48.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 58 | 37 | 17 | 4 | 63.8% |
| Australian Defense | 54 | 32 | 21 | 1 | 59.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 50 | 32 | 16 | 2 | 64.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 43 | 23 | 17 | 3 | 53.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 41 | 26 | 14 | 1 | 63.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 39 | 25 | 13 | 1 | 64.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 36 | 25 | 10 | 1 | 69.4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 28 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 64.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 20 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 88.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 4.Bf4 Bg7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 3 |