Amin Shater (aka CatAteMcD)
Meet Amin Shater, a chess enthusiast whose online alias CatAteMcD hints at a playful spirit and probably a fondness for fast food during intense blitz sessions! Amin’s journey through the ranks showcases a remarkable climb from modest beginnings to a formidable adversary across all timed formats.
Progress and Prowess
Starting with a rapid rating below 1500 in 2021, Amin quickly sharpened his skills, breaking through 2300 in rapid chess by early 2025. Blitz and bullet are where he truly shines, boasting peak ratings over 2450 and an impressive average bullet rating around 2387 in 2025. In other words: if speed chess was an Olympic sport, Amin would at least be on the podium—sorry, Magnus!
Playing Style
This speed demon’s games are characterized by long endgames (you’ll see an average of almost 70 moves per win), a patient resilience, and a knack for comebacks. In fact, after losing a piece, Amin’s win rate is an eyebrow-raising 99.67%, proving that giving up material is just another tactical step in his plan. His tilt factor is a commendable 13, showing that even in defeat, frustration rarely gets the better of him.
Records and Rivalries
Amin has played thousands of games, stacking up over 11,600 wins across rapid, blitz, and bullet. His longest winning streak is a staggering 42 games—imagine that streak at your local club! Opponents like Greenflower65 and amanchakma have felt Amin’s wrath repeatedly, with a solid 77%+ win rate against them.
Recent Battles and Victories
In his latest clashes, Amin plays sharp openings like the English and Caro-Kann, finishing games convincingly by opponent resignation or time forfeiture. Whether squeezing wins from deep endgame positions or outpacing rivals in bullet, he keeps the opposition on their toes.
The Final Word
Amin Shater is the prime example of perseverance and speed combined. Whether you find him calmly outmaneuvering in rapid or blitzing past the clock in bullet, his nickname CatAteMcD reminds us that even chess masters must keep their fuel in check—preferably some fast food to match his lightning-fast moves. Just watch out when you face him; jokingly invoking “cat” and “McDonald’s” might be your last mistake!
What you’re doing well
- You show willingness to play sharp, dynamic lines and keep pressure on your opponent when the position becomes complicated. This creates practical chances in blitz where calm calculation can be hard.
- Your willingness to activate pieces and look for aggressive ideas helps you stay in the fight even when the position is rough. When you find a plan that targets weaknesses in your opponent’s setup, you often gain practical results.
- You handle unusual or offbeat openings with confidence and keep the game flowing. That flexibility helps you avoid being easily boxed in and gives you chances to steer the game toward favorable types of positions.
- You show perseverance in middlegame clashes and look for counterplay, rather than immediately giving up when you’re behind in development. That resilience is valuable in blitz.
Areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: try to allocate a consistent thinking pace and avoid large, last-minute decisions. A simple rule is to aim for steady, incremental progress through the middlegame and reserve a small amount of safe time for the final phase.
- Calculation discipline: before capturing or pushing, scan for forcing moves (checks, captures, threats) and check a couple of candidate continuations. This helps reduce surprises in sharp positions.
- Endgame technique: practice basic king-and-pawn endings and simple rook endings so you can convert small material advantages more reliably or hold draws when needed.
- Opening planning: develop a compact, 1-2 opening repertoire for blitz with clear plans after the first few moves. Focus on recognizing typical structures and piece placements rather than memorizing long lines.
- Tactical pattern recognition: commit to a daily short set of puzzles (5–15 minutes) to strengthen quick pattern recognition, which is crucial in fast time controls.
Practical plan to level up
- Week 1 — Tactics and pace: daily puzzles (15–20 minutes) and practice finishing positions with a steady pace. Review 1–2 games to extract key moments where better time management or a different plan would help.
- Week 2 — Endgames: study essential rook endings, king activity, and pawn endings. Do 2 short endgame drills after your tactics sessions.
- Week 3 — Opening refinement: select two solid openings for White and two for Black. Learn the main plans (typical pawn structures, where pieces belong, and common pawn breaks) and practice them in unrated or slower games.
- Week 4 — Review and apply: analyse 3 recent blitz games, focusing on decision points where you could have improved time management, calculation, or endgame technique. Create a short, actionable checklist for future games.
- Ongoing: keep a simple, mobile-friendly study routine—brief puzzle practice, quick openings review, and post-game notes after each blitz session.
Opening notes
You’ve experimented with aggressive lines and flexible setups, including systems related to the King’s Indian family and English/Anglo-Indian ideas. Consider simplifying your immediate opening goals to two main lines with clear middlegame plans. This helps you reach comfortable positions sooner and reduces negotiations under time pressure.
- Explore a focused tiny repertoire for blitz, such as a compact King’s Indian family approach for dynamic play, and a solid English-leaning setup for quieter games.
- For each chosen opening, note 2–3 typical pawn structures and 2–3 common middlegame plans you can recall quickly in a blitz setting.
- Use placeholders for quick recall during practice, for example: King’s Indian Defense with a plan to target center control, and English Opening with a plan to develop on the queen side and prepare a flexible structure.
Encouragement and next steps
You’re making solid progress in blitz by staying active and choosing dynamic paths. If you implement the plan above, you’ll likely see improvements in time management, calculation accuracy, and endgame conversion. Keep a steady practice pace, review, and adjust your repertoire based on what tends to produce the most consistent results.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| good_knight_kiss | 4W / 1L / 0D | |
| rabea_mohamed | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| utessimdzhanov | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| utopist_legend | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| 3eegd | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| dantsev | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| cedarelo | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| ryuujinct | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| egotomoe | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| gereon-rath1970 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| greenflower65 | 434W / 123L / 15D | |
| lisaocs | 397W / 47L / 2D | |
| mr_totoyoung | 121W / 5L / 0D | |
| m4nter | 65W / 23L / 2D | |
| pratham1111111111 | 33W / 40L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2504 | 2425 | 2311 | 949 |
| 2024 | 2420 | 2443 | 2223 | 837 |
| 2023 | 2095 | 2204 | 2143 | 781 |
| 2022 | 1542 | 1755 | 1749 | 827 |
| 2021 | 1088 | 1176 | 1461 | 839 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1328W / 921L / 99D | 1262W / 1014L / 109D | 74.9 |
| 2024 | 2477W / 1890L / 167D | 2304W / 2094L / 145D | 73.9 |
| 2023 | 1434W / 1043L / 126D | 1283W / 1187L / 110D | 71.2 |
| 2022 | 708W / 515L / 46D | 630W / 584L / 44D | 64.6 |
| 2021 | 542W / 406L / 31D | 522W / 412L / 36D | 58.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 207 | 125 | 74 | 8 | 60.4% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 104 | 57 | 37 | 10 | 54.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 89 | 52 | 34 | 3 | 58.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 85 | 51 | 29 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 69 | 45 | 24 | 0 | 65.2% |
| Australian Defense | 66 | 40 | 25 | 1 | 60.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 62 | 33 | 23 | 6 | 53.2% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 59 | 33 | 24 | 2 | 55.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 55 | 26 | 24 | 5 | 47.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 51 | 26 | 23 | 2 | 51.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 987 | 512 | 426 | 49 | 51.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 585 | 333 | 232 | 20 | 56.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 465 | 261 | 186 | 18 | 56.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 370 | 218 | 138 | 14 | 58.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 315 | 172 | 133 | 10 | 54.6% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 305 | 158 | 136 | 11 | 51.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 304 | 159 | 129 | 16 | 52.3% |
| Australian Defense | 289 | 177 | 104 | 8 | 61.2% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 256 | 134 | 112 | 10 | 52.3% |
| Modern | 227 | 122 | 100 | 5 | 53.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1263 | 683 | 516 | 64 | 54.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1016 | 524 | 460 | 32 | 51.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 930 | 515 | 387 | 28 | 55.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 786 | 414 | 344 | 28 | 52.7% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 448 | 248 | 185 | 15 | 55.4% |
| Australian Defense | 436 | 231 | 188 | 17 | 53.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 390 | 174 | 203 | 13 | 44.6% |
| Modern | 328 | 142 | 174 | 12 | 43.3% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 278 | 121 | 148 | 9 | 43.5% |
| King's Indian Attack | 265 | 144 | 112 | 9 | 54.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 26.3% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| KGA: Bishop's Gambit, Bledow, 4.Bxd5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Anti-Queen's Indian System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Classical Defense, Benelux Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 49 | 4 |
| Losing | 24 | 0 |