Profile
Emmanuel, known online as CemLions, is a chess player who loves fast, tricky battles. With Blitz as his preferred battleground, he blends sharp tactics with a touch of humor to keep games lively and the clock honest.
Alias: CemLions. Preferred time control: Blitz. A quick-witted competitor who treats every tick of the clock as a nudge to invent something new.
emmanuelPlaying Style
Emmanuel thrives on dynamic, tactical melees where imagination can outpace a bare-knuckle race to the finish. He enjoys taking the initiative in the opening and keeping pressure on in the middlegame, often crafting surprising continuations when the position looks calm.
Career Highlights
- Longest winning streak: 13 games.
- Current winning streak: 2 games.
- Blitz peak rating: 1469 (2024-02-08) 1557 (2025-09-22).
- Rapid peak rating: 1840 (2025-08-27).
- Bullet peak rating: 1527 (2023-12-26).
- Opening repertoire highlights (Blitz and Rapid):
- Scandinavian Defense – a frequent choice with solid results Scandinavian Defense.
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense – steady, principled routes Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense.
- Caro-Kann Defense – a reliable alternative for balanced play Caro-Kann Defense.
Sample Game
A small taste of Emmanuel's Blitz creativity. The following PGN snippet illustrates a concise, tactical line.
Find Emmanuel
Want to follow along or challenge him? See his profile here: emmanuel
What you’re doing well
You show a strong willingness to fight for initiative in the middlegame and keep your pieces active. In blitz, this willingness to complicate can pay off when your opponent missteps, and you often manage to create practical chances even from open, tactical positions. You also demonstrate resilience in following through with aggressive plans when the position supports it, keeping pressure on the opponent’s king and back rank.
Another positive is your ability to generate dynamic play from early imbalances. When you sense an initiative, you tend to coordinate rooks and minor pieces toward attacking lanes, which can force a defensive response from your opponent.
Key improvements to focus on
- Time management in blitz: devote a quick pass to evaluate the forcing moves and main candidate lines, then decide. If a line looks too sharp or uncertain, simplify to a safer plan to avoid time trouble.
- Calculation discipline: before committing to a tactical sequence, check at least two reasonable defensive responses your opponent could have. If the line requires deep calculation, consider a safer move that maintains pressure without overextending.
- Endgame conversion: when you reach an endgame with a small material edge or active rooks, aim for a clear plan to convert. Practice keeping the king active and using the rooks on open files to push a decisive breakthrough.
- Opening consistency: blitz benefits from a compact, reliable repertoire. Rely on 2 White and 2 Black openings that you know well, so you can transition to the middlegame with confidence rather than guessing.
- Post-game reflection: after each blitz session, identify 2-3 critical moments (mistakes, blunders, or missed improvements) and write down the better plan. This builds a repeatable improvement loop.
Actionable plan for the next 7–14 days
- Daily tactics practice: 15–20 minutes focused on common blitz motifs (forks, pins, skewers, back-rank ideas) to improve pattern recognition under time pressure.
- Opening consolidation: pick two White lines you’re comfortable with (for example, a sharp but teachable line and a solid, quieter option) and two Black responses. Study typical middlegame ideas and common traps from those lines, then play practice games to build familiarity.
- Endgames and technique: reserve 10–15 minutes for rook endings and simple king-and-pawn endings. Learn a few standard conversion methods (active rook on the seventh, central passer, etc.).
- Post-game reviews: after each blitz session, pick 1 difficult game and annotate it. Note the turning point, what you could have done differently, and a concrete 2-move improvement you can apply on the next game.
- Time management drill: during a game, set a mental checkpoint before move 20 and move 40 to ensure you’re not rushed. If you’re under time pressure, switch to a safer, simpler plan rather than chasing a complex tactic.
Opening strategy notes
Your openings data shows some lines that tend to perform well in blitz. Consider leaning into these two ideas as White and two as Black to build confidence and reduce mistakes: - White lines with solid structure and active piece play can yield comfortable middlegames. Barnes Opening: Walkerling is a good example to explore for practical, aggressive play. - Black responses that activate pieces and put pressure on White’s center can lead to favorable middlegames. Scandinavian Defense offers straightforward plans and good piece activity. - Be cautious with highly tactical, less-tested lines in blitz; some lines (like certain aggressive setups) show lower win rates and can backfire under time pressure. You may prefer more balance in those slots unless you’ve prepared them deeply.
Concepts to study alongside these openings: piece activity in the early middlegame, typical pawn breaks, and common traps that arise from these structures. For a quick reference, you can explore related material with internal references like Danish-Gambit or Queens-Gambit variations as you test them in practice games.
Practice resources and quick references
To support your plan, use short, targeted drills and review notes. You can also embed small practice notes in your training log, for example: -
- - Keep a tiny “blunder list” with 1–2 items per week to avoid repeating similar mistakes.🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 85jesus85 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kelvynj | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| 6_izumi | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| felisbertosalambi | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| gujajr | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| real_bas | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| smiles1966 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| millennial0 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| anonimys21 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ashkana202 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chaosblind | 87W / 163L / 14D | View Games |
| niklaskarlsson84 | 118W / 98L / 7D | View Games |
| ch3rn0byl6522 | 98W / 72L / 3D | View Games |
| aabhash_dahal | 46W / 86L / 5D | View Games |
| chessmasterjsksksksisisoo | 40W / 17L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1549 | 1663 | ||
| 2024 | 930 | 1235 | 1730 | |
| 2023 | 1340 | 1022 | 1493 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 535W / 496L / 44D | 513W / 502L / 52D | 68.3 |
| 2024 | 1730W / 1474L / 139D | 1545W / 1618L / 172D | 68.4 |
| 2023 | 330W / 279L / 26D | 282W / 326L / 30D | 69.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 336 | 166 | 156 | 14 | 49.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 217 | 118 | 88 | 11 | 54.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 136 | 71 | 61 | 4 | 52.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 128 | 66 | 57 | 5 | 51.6% |
| Scotch Game | 102 | 47 | 48 | 7 | 46.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 95 | 43 | 52 | 0 | 45.3% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 94 | 55 | 36 | 3 | 58.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 94 | 45 | 42 | 7 | 47.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 92 | 36 | 50 | 6 | 39.1% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 86 | 43 | 39 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 513 | 252 | 233 | 28 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 385 | 205 | 158 | 22 | 53.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 349 | 166 | 170 | 13 | 47.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 238 | 123 | 106 | 9 | 51.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 221 | 111 | 98 | 12 | 50.2% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 191 | 90 | 93 | 8 | 47.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 191 | 94 | 90 | 7 | 49.2% |
| Scotch Game | 183 | 76 | 99 | 8 | 41.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 169 | 85 | 78 | 6 | 50.3% |
| Ruy Lopez: Classical Defense, Benelux Variation | 144 | 59 | 72 | 13 | 41.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 71 | 30 | 41 | 0 | 42.2% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 45 | 19 | 25 | 1 | 42.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 17 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 23.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 35.3% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 16 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 12.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 15 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 13.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Czech Defense | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% |
| Modern | 9 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 11.1% |
| Philidor Defense | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |