Chamal Gedgafov - National Master of Chess
Chamal Gedgafov, better known in chess circles as Chamal_Gedgafov, is a distinguished National Master who has battled wits across various time controls with remarkable persistence and flair. Starting with a modest Blitz rating of 1368 in 2016, Chamal rapidly stormed the charts, achieving a peak Blitz rating near 2480 in 2022—a rating that would make any chess enthusiast nod appreciatively.
Known for a tactical awareness that borders on clairvoyance, Chamal boasts a comeback rate of over 89%, and an astounding 100% win rate after losing a piece—clearly someone who never goes down without a dramatic fight! Their endgame technique is nothing short of legendary, featuring in over 80% of games, showcasing patience and precision that could put a grandmaster's nerves to the test.
An avid Blitz battler, Chamal has amassed thousands of games, steadily increasing their average rating and cultivating a reputation as a formidable opponent. Their longest winning streak is an impressive 12 games, proving that once Chamal sets their sights on victory, not even the Sicilian Defense can stop the charge.
When not blitzing opponents into submission, Chamal also enjoys rapid and bullet games, maintaining winning percentages above 60% and proving versatile across formats. And while their Daily chess ratings are more modest, it’s not for lack of tenacity—in fact, every loss is but a prelude to another fighting game.
Off the board, Chamal might be the kind of player to chuckle at their own bad blunders, only to return stronger next match. Their Tilt Factor sits low at just 11, meaning frustration is a stranger—unless it’s caused by an opponent who knows to mate in one on move 12.
Always ready to challenge favorites and newcomers alike, Chamal’s record against many frequent opponents varies, but one thing remains clear: facing Chamal means facing a thinker who knows the game beyond the 64 squares... and who might just throw in a cheeky joke when you least expect it.
In the grand chessboard of life, Chamal Gedgafov plays boldly, laughs often, and never resigns early.
Hi Chamal, here’s some tailored feedback based on your latest blitz games
Key strengths to keep building on
- Tactical eye. Your 20.Nxg5!! in the win vs blueshark23 (see mini-game below) shows you’re willing to calculate forcing lines and cash in.
- Practical repertoire. You steer the game into structures you know well: London ( d4–Bf4 ), French/Winawer and Benko. This consistency is giving you good middlegame positions.
- Conversion technique. Endgames like your K+P win vs CaveWorld show patient maneuvering—something many blitz players lack.
Patterns that cost you points
- Clock control. Three of the four losses supplied were timeout or last-seconds blunders from heavy time trouble. Even winning positions need time to convert.
➜ Train with a 3 + 2 or 5 + 3 increment to ingrain “move-then-think” habits. - Loose pawn thrusts. In the Winawer loss to Olsbom you played …b6 & …f6 without finishing development, leaving the dark squares and the c-file weak. Similar over-extension (…g5 …c4) appeared in the Benko time-out game.
➜ Before advancing flank pawns, ask “Is my king completely safe?” ― classic prophylaxis. - Plan-drift in comfortable positions. Several London games stall after you win a pawn; pieces get shuffled while the opponent stirs up counter-play. Create a checklist: open file? improve worst piece? exchange into a winning endgame?
Concrete next steps
- Opening refresh. Pick one line per colour to study deeply this week:
- White: 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 e6 3.e3 b6 … (Indian/London) — learn the typical e4 break ideas.
- Black: French Winawer vs 3.Nc3. Review a model game by Vachier-Lagrave to see how he handles the h4 advance.
- Timed calculation drills. Set a five-minute limit per puzzle and write down the full main line before moving. Focus on CCT (Checks-Captures-Threats) to reduce oversight.
- Endgame micro-goals. Each session, play out two technical endings (Q + P vs Q, or R + P vs R) against an engine until mate. This will speed up your conversion muscle memory.
Stats & progress trackers
Peak blitz rating: 2480 (2022-11-11)
When are you hottest? →
Mindset tip
In blitz the first accurate move is often more valuable than searching for the best move. If you’re below 20 seconds, simplify or force a perpetual so the result is decided on the board, not on the clock.
Keep the momentum, enjoy the grind, and let me know when you break the next rating wall!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| sharpharpoon | 15W / 13L / 5D | View Games |
| Henrik Dalsgaard | 13W / 8L / 3D | View Games |
| ivari60 | 12W / 8L / 0D | View Games |
| thedurrrrr | 1W / 14L / 0D | View Games |
| umbramortis | 7W / 8L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2293 | |||
| 2024 | 2341 | |||
| 2023 | 2398 | 2208 | 969 | |
| 2022 | 1704 | 2288 | 2208 | 1010 |
| 2021 | 1350 | 2172 | 1022 | |
| 2020 | 1824 | 2332 | 2132 | |
| 2019 | 2072 | |||
| 2018 | 1266 | 2124 | ||
| 2017 | 2106 | |||
| 2016 | 1720 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0W / 1L / 1D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 71.2 |
| 2024 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 101.5 |
| 2023 | 65W / 73L / 24D | 61W / 70L / 25D | 82.4 |
| 2022 | 421W / 356L / 152D | 399W / 390L / 126D | 83.1 |
| 2021 | 252W / 155L / 23D | 205W / 186L / 30D | 75.3 |
| 2020 | 137W / 118L / 19D | 139W / 118L / 24D | 76.1 |
| 2019 | 28W / 24L / 0D | 28W / 22L / 3D | 75.7 |
| 2018 | 227W / 212L / 20D | 193W / 252L / 20D | 76.7 |
| 2017 | 129W / 98L / 15D | 115W / 103L / 13D | 77.7 |
| 2016 | 3W / 1L / 0D | 4W / 0L / 0D | 62.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 210 | 99 | 86 | 25 | 47.1% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 194 | 85 | 84 | 25 | 43.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 181 | 78 | 71 | 32 | 43.1% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 144 | 75 | 56 | 13 | 52.1% |
| Australian Defense | 137 | 65 | 63 | 9 | 47.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 98 | 40 | 45 | 13 | 40.8% |
| East Indian Defense | 96 | 39 | 42 | 15 | 40.6% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 95 | 47 | 44 | 4 | 49.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 93 | 37 | 45 | 11 | 39.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 93 | 40 | 47 | 6 | 43.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird's Defense Deferred | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.e3 O-O | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 4.Bf4 Bg7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Old Benoni | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |