Jim Blackwood - National Master and Chess Adventurer
Known online as chess50years, Jim Blackwood is not your average chess player. With the prestigious title of National Master proudly earned from the National Chess Federation, Jim blends mastery with a pinch of unpredictable charm over the 64 squares.
Rating Rollercoaster and Game Style
Jim’s blitz rating has been a thrilling ride, peaking impressively at 2180 in late 2022, and remaining solidly above 2000 for years after – a testament to his consistency, stamina, and unyielding spirit. While bullet and rapid play occasionally flirt with the highs of 1903 and 2075 respectively, blitz remains his battlefield of choice.
With an overall blitz record boasting 707 wins and a nearly even split of losses and draws, Jim proves to be a fierce competitor who rarely backs down. His tactical awareness is no joke either, with a remarkable 87.92% comeback rate and the uncanny ability to turn losses into wins after a lost piece 41% of the time. Clearly, counting Jim out prematurely is a blunder.
A Strategic Philosopher at Heart
Jim is a patient strategist who prefers long-battles over quick taps; his average moves per victory hover around 76, signaling deep calculation and a fondness for endgame finesse (he dives into endgames 82% of the time). But don’t be fooled by the calm exterior – his psychological "tilt factor" stands at a modest 6, just enough to remind us he’s human, yet controlled enough to maintain his focus.
Favorite Moments and Recent Highlights
One might say Jim’s creative spark shines brightest at the crack of dawn – his best time of day to play is 4 AM, proving he can outwit foes while most are dreaming of snacks and not forks and knights. His latest victory was a stylish win using the Queens Indian Defense (Petrosian Variation), where patience and tactical precision led his opponent down the path to resignation.
Legend, Yet Approachable
Despite his chess prowess, Jim keeps a humble, approachable vibe. If chess were a sitcom, Jim would be the clever underdog‘s enigmatic mentor—equal parts master and mischief-maker, occasionally whispering, "Did you see that trick? That wasn’t in the books."
Whether you’re a casual player looking to improve or a seasoned veteran seeking a worthy adversary, Jim Blackwood’s games are an experience—complex, gripping, and occasionally sprinkled with his signature unpredictable flair. So next time you meet chess50years online, be ready for an intellectual journey full of twists, turns, and the occasional checkmate that makes you smile.
Hi Jim, here’s some constructive feedback based on your latest blitz (180 + 2) games.
1. Quick Snapshot
- Current form: several convincing tactical wins balanced by a few painful collapses.
- 2180 (2022-11-29) – keep an eye on how close you are to your personal best.
- – use these to spot when you play your sharpest chess.
2. What you’re doing well
- Piece manoeuvring ▶ The win against Alexandrovski shows excellent rerouting (…Nf8–g6, …Qc7–c8) and patient pressure before striking with 33…Qa1+ and 36…Qg6#.
- Dynamic openings ▶ You handle flexible structures (Modern, Queens-Indian, Fianchetto set-ups) comfortably, often outplaying opponents out of book.
- Tactical awareness ▶ Finishes such as 46…Qb2# (vs disoku) highlight good calculation when the initiative is yours.
3. Repeating trouble spots
- King safety before pawn storms
In several losses you opened your own king with …g6 / h4-h5 without being fully developed.
Example: against maafernan you never castled and afterthe open diagonal + g-pawn hook was decisive. - Over-extension in the centre
Pushing …d4 or …c5 too early (London loss, Caro-Kann loss vs Vlad-93) left targets behind your pawns. Ask “Can my opponent lock or undermine this pawn in one move?” before advancing. - Time management
Four of the last ten results were decided on the clock (two wins, two losses). You often spend 60-70 % of your time on the first 15 moves and then rush critical endings. Try the “40/40 rule”: aim to keep ≥40 % of your clock for the final 40 % of moves.
4. Targeted recommendations
- Early castling habit – make it automatic unless there is a concrete reason not to. Delayed castling cost you in both London and English games.
- Structured middlegame plans
• Queens-Indian / Modern setups: review classical plans with …e5 break only after completing development.
• As White vs Sicilian: when you choose 9.f4 (Magnus variation) keep an eye on the b4-square – Black’s …Nb4 in your win vs ODYSSEUS shows why. - Prophylactic thinking drills – after every candidate move ask “What is my opponent’s most annoying reply?” (see Karpov’s games for model examples).
- Endgame refresh – the won rook ending you flagged vs giza1 would be trivial with a rehearsed conversion routine (cut the king, push passer, use checks from behind).
5. Practical study plan (4 hrs / week)
| Mon | 30 min tactic trainer (rated puzzles) 30 min review of one of your time-loss games focusing on move-by-move clock usage. |
| Wed | 45 min endgame drill (rook + pawn vs rook, Lucena & Philidor) 15 min openings – update London-System defence file. |
| Fri | 1 rapid (15|10) game with commentary, emphasising early castling and centre control. |
| Weekend | 60 min model-game study – pick one game each from Karpov (prophylaxis) and Kasparov (pawn storms executed safely). |
6. Motivation corner
You’re already beating 2100-level players with tactical flair. Shoring up king safety and clock control could realistically add 80-100 rating points in the next month. Keep the creative spark – just give it a safer home!
Good luck in your upcoming games, Jim. I’m always here if you need deeper opening files or game annotations.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| erzbischof | 2W / 4L / 1D | |
| arschem21 | 3W / 2L / 0D | |
| master7970 | 3W / 2L / 0D | |
| runemusen | 3W / 2L / 0D | |
| srcorelo | 3W / 1L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2072 | |||
| 2023 | 2065 | |||
| 2022 | 1779 | 1993 | 1988 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 156W / 120L / 38D | 132W / 151L / 30D | 80.9 |
| 2023 | 132W / 130L / 37D | 116W / 144L / 42D | 82.6 |
| 2022 | 110W / 99L / 26D | 91W / 129L / 26D | 78.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 105 | 40 | 52 | 13 | 38.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 88 | 35 | 38 | 15 | 39.8% |
| Modern | 85 | 36 | 42 | 7 | 42.4% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 51 | 25 | 23 | 3 | 49.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 49 | 27 | 20 | 2 | 55.1% |
| Australian Defense | 48 | 24 | 23 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 43 | 22 | 16 | 5 | 51.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 37 | 14 | 21 | 2 | 37.8% |
| Czech Defense | 34 | 15 | 17 | 2 | 44.1% |
| French Defense | 32 | 15 | 14 | 3 | 46.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Bb4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.e3 O-O | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Classical Defense, Benelux Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Tiviakov Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 2 |
| Losing | 6 | 0 |