Player Profile: chess_dear
From humble beginnings to breaking the 2300+ barrier in multiple time controls, chess_dear has carved out a name as a fiercely competitive and tactically adept player. Known to embrace complex positions and mount spectacular comebacks, chess_dear’s journey is marked by incremental improvements, consistent practice, and a clear drive to win.
Rapid Rise
Early on, they hovered around a modest 1700-rating range in Rapid before launching an impressive climb to their peak of 2393. The climb included several high-level victories (over 200 total wins) and a notable streak of 15 consecutive victories. Their Rapid record stands at 201 wins, 128 losses, and 46 draws, reflecting both endurance and resilience through many hard-fought battles.
Bullet Mastery
Speed chess is another arena where chess_dear excels. Reaching a peak rating of 2278 in Bullet, they have amassed 133 wins (with just 64 losses and 13 draws). The ability to respond accurately in a flash is evident in their strong track record, making them a formidable opponent in even the fastest time controls.
Blitz Brilliance
In Blitz, chess_dear has showcased dynamic play and sharp tactical alertness, pushing their highest rating to 2391. With 58 wins, 29 losses, and 9 draws in classical Blitz alone—plus a perfect 100% win rate in specialized variants like Three-Check—they demonstrate an uncanny talent for swiftly punishing inaccuracies.
Playing Style & Strengths
A key component of chess_dear’s success is their deep endgame skill, taking games into long battles, as 81.64% of their matches reach endgames. They average about 73 moves per victory, indicating a relentless fighting spirit. If they fall behind, they often stage remarkable recoveries, boasting an 86.22% comeback rate and a rare ability to rebound even when losing material.
Psychology & Timing
Whether by intuition or planned routine, chess_dear achieves higher success rates on Fridays, with a 65.98% win rate, and seems to perform best around 17:00 (5 PM). An interesting note is their tilt factor of 5, suggesting occasional slumps do occur—yet they remain composed enough to maintain an impressive rating, especially under standard, rated conditions (exceeding their casual performance by over 57%).
Conclusion
Bold, calculated, and persistent, chess_dear continues to grow as a player who loves the complexity of chess in every format. Their approach—an endgame focus, strong tactical awareness, and patience—has propelled them beyond 2300 in multiple time controls. As they keep polishing their openings and accelerating into the endgame, the chess world can expect even more phenomenal successes in the near future.
Personalized Feedback for Marjan Owrangi
Current Snapshot
• Peak Blitz rating so far: 2497 (2025-09-06)
• Games analysed: 10 (6 wins, 4 losses) – see trend:
Your Competitive Strengths
- Initiative-seeking style. In the majority of your wins you grabbed space early (e.g. g3/Bg2 set-ups or the Closed-Sicilian with f4) and kept opponents on the back foot.
- Tactical alertness. Motifs such as Nxf6+, Nxd5, and queen-sacs for perpetual checks appear frequently and usually work in your favour.
- Piece activity over material. You are comfortable returning pawns to open files or diagonals; this yields practical chances in < 60-second time controls.
Recurring Issues to Address
-
Time management. Three of the last four losses ended on the clock while you were still objectively fine.
Recommendation: insert “mini checkpoints” (after the opening, after each trade) where you spend 2-3 seconds to update your plan instead of moving instantly in obvious positions. -
King safety once the queens stay on.
• Example: vs hyhyhyhy2003 you delayed …Kh7 …g5 consolidation, allowing Rh1-h6-h7 ideas.
• Example PGN fragment: Work on the habit of asking “What is my opponent’s next check?” every move. - Converting extra material in technical endings. In the win against chessweda the rook+rook vs rook ending took 40 extra moves because the h-pawn was pushed before restricting the enemy king. Study “rook-and-rook vs rook” winning technique (Philidor & Lucena).
- Over-optimistic pawn storms with Black in the Scandinavian / Alekhine. Early …f6 or …g5 without development gave opponents targets. Try inserting a useful developing move first (…Nc6, …Be7) and only then expand.
Opening Map
| Colour | Frequent Choice | Score | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| White | King’s Fianchetto / English hybrid | +68% | Add a sharper main-line d4 repertoire vs …d5 to diversify. |
| Black | Sicilian: Accelerated & Rossolimo | +55% | Refresh your …b6 & …Bb7 plans versus early Bb5; review games of im_kosta. |
| Black | Scandinavian ( …Qd8 retreat) | -40% | Consider switching to the dynamic 3…Qa5 or adopt the solid Petroff to reduce early queen exposure. |
Targeted Training Plan (4-Week Cycle)
- Week 1: Everyday 20 min of Beat-the-Clock drills – positions shown with only 15 seconds to find the best move.
- Week 2: Endgame focus – play the “Rook vs Rook Endings” chapter from Silman or use the Chess.com drills on Lucena, Philidor and the tricky Vancura.
- Week 3: Repertoire deep dive – analyse 10 master games in your preferred King’s Fianchetto line; build a memory palace of critical junctions (use the move-number anchors technique).
- Week 4: Sparring sessions vs. engines set to “200 Elo higher” with forced time odds (you get 3 min, engine gets 2 min). Goal: improve decision speed without compromising quality.
Quick Habit Checklist Before Each Move
- Material & pawn structure tally (2 sec).
- Forcing move scan: checks, captures, threats (4 sec).
- Update worst placed piece – can it improve? (2 sec).
- Only then look for the “prettiest” continuation.
Motivational Note
The jump from good tactician to well-rounded player usually happens when time-trouble losses disappear. Your accuracy in quiet positions is already respectable – pair it with better clock handling and you are on a clear path to 2400 Blitz.
Keep up the fighting spirit and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| trick_or_treat_zw | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| waveletboy | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| prachet_sharma | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ubiquitouslyfluffy | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Samuel Hoekman | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| rahul_narayanan | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| cybersurfer12 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| thepriestofbach | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ponomarenkovlad | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| eros_2018 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| a_aghajanpour | 2W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| dohshy | 3W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
| owenov | 3W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| malditacow | 4W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| Molarband | 1W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2394 | 2411 | 2374 | 1600 |
| 2024 | 2113 | 2332 | 2344 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 273W / 181L / 41D | 267W / 181L / 44D | 83.2 |
| 2024 | 145W / 66L / 22D | 126W / 83L / 22D | 83.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 22 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 22 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 45.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 22 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 86.4% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 17 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 64.7% |
| Czech Defense | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 12 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 41.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 41.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 18.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 85 | 57 | 23 | 5 | 67.1% |
| Modern | 39 | 25 | 12 | 2 | 64.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 35 | 20 | 13 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 15 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 53.3% |
| French Defense | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 42.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 61.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Australian Defense | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 45.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 24 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 58.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 23 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 60.9% |
| Benko Gambit | 21 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 18 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 17 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 76.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 17 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 41.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 17 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 41.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 15 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 73.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 1 |