Chesstrix01: The Unstoppable Chess Dynamo
Meet Chesstrix01, a blitz-hungry tactician who began his journey at a modest rating of 1363 in 2014 and has since rocketed to a blistering peak rating of 2631 in blitz by 2025. From humble opening moves to crushing endgames, Chesstrix01’s career reads like a chess thriller—full of ups, downs, and plenty of jaw-dropping checkmates.
Known for his Top Secret opening repertoire (because, well, he won’t reveal his secrets), Chesstrix01 has played over 10,700 blitz games with a solid 51% win rate. Bullet and rapid chess have also bent to his will, with bullet rating peaking near 2620 and a rapid max rating soaring above 2340.
His style? A breakfast buffet of patience and aggression:
- Average moves per win: 76 (because rushing is for amateurs!)
- Endgame frequency: An impressive 76% (he likes to finish strong)
- Comeback rate: Nearly 89% (don’t count him out if you snatch a piece!)
- Win rate after losing a piece: A remarkable 98.8% (chess Houdini alert!)
Although his tilt factor sits at a moderate 55, Chesstrix01’s resilience shines through, displaying psychological toughness and a strategic mind. His play peaks in the late evening hours, with win rates hitting nearly 78% at 21:00 and a perfect 100% at 22:00 — clearly, this is the prime time for wrecking opponents.
When it comes to opponents, Chesstrix01’s win/loss record is a rollercoaster. Some foes, like "cr4cf1redestr0y" and "langesnasenhaar," have been utterly dismantled, while others like “mouchess0707” remain a mystery to conquer. If you face him, prepare for an intense battle where resignations come early (only 2.7% of the time), but victories come in long, satisfying fights.
And those streaks? His longest winning streak stands tall at 21 games — enough to make anyone wary of sitting across the board. Currently riding a winning streak, Chesstrix01 looks ever-hungry for more victories.
In short, Chesstrix01 is like a chess chameleon wrapped in mystery, with a blend of nerves of steel, strategic depth, and perhaps a dash of wizardry. Don’t be surprised if the next time you open your chess app, you find this relentless player’s ghost haunting your next game.
Play smart, play fast, or get crushed by Chesstrix01!
Coach’s Feedback for Chesstrix01
Quick Overview
- Current strength: solid high-2300/2400-plus blitz player with a clear preference for Nimzo-Indian–type structures as Black and 1.d4 systems as White.
- Stylistic profile: dynamic, tactical, willing to accept structural weaknesses in return for activity. You rarely shy away from complications—this is a double-edged sword that wins you many games, but also costs a few painful losses.
- Typical time control: 3-minute blitz & 3 + 2; you score best in the first half of every hour and taper off when games pile up ().
- Peak so far: 2631 (2025-04-22).
Your Key Strengths
- Tactical awareness. The miniature below shows how quickly you convert an initiative into mate:
- Opening preparation. You are comfortable in mainstream Nimzo-Indian and King’s Indian Four-Pawns lines. Opponents below 2500 often fall into early strategic traps against you.
- Resourcefulness under pressure. In several “won on time” games you were the one posing practical problems even in equal positions.
Main Improvement Areas
-
Move-ordering & prophylaxis.
In the loss to Jackchess146 (E32) the sequence 17.f3 Ng5 18.h4 Nh3+ 19.gxh3 Qxh4 showed a blind spot: you pushed a pawn (h4) before securing g3. Add a quick — “what can my opponent do next?” — check to every forcing line. -
Piece coordination in quiet positions.
Repeat moves such as Bd3–Be2–Bd3 cost you three tempi in multiple games. When the position is static, adopt a clear plan (e.g. minority attack or central break) and reposition once. -
Time management.
Five of your last six losses ended with <20 seconds on the clock while you still had playable positions. The good news: blitz time trouble is coachable.
- Use the 10-second rule: if after 10 s you have not calculated a concrete tactic, make the most sensible improving move (king safety, rook to open file, pawn off the back rank).
- Practise 1 | 0 bullet to desensitise yourself to low-clock anxiety; then come back to 3 | 0.
-
Endgame technique.
Games vs julsz08 and Mathemann29 reached queen & rook endings where you drifted. Two weekly sessions of rook-pawn endgame puzzles will repay themselves quickly.
Opening-Specific Advice
| As White (1.d4) | As Black |
|---|---|
|
• Your Qc2 Nimzo lines are fine, but the early e5/Ne4 break you played vs Jackchess146 left weaknesses on d5/e4. • Add one calm system (e.g. the London System) for days you feel tactical fatigue. |
• Great results with Nimzo E20–E34. Consider learning the related Bogo-Indian to avoid 3.Nf3 sidelines. • In the QGD Cambridge-Springs loss you entered a sharp …Qa5 line without knowing the 14…Bb4! tactic. Review key-moves with a short repertoire file. |
Concrete Training Plan (4 weeks)
- Daily: 15 min of tactics at 3 min per puzzle. Focus on themes deflection, interference, Zwischenzug.
- 3×/week: play two 10 | 5 rapid games and annotate them yourself before checking with an engine.
- Weekly: choose one critical endgame from your archive; set it up vs the computer and play it out three times with both colours.
- Opening tune-up: build a 15-move depth file for the Nimzo Kmoch (E20) and your Four-Pawns line; test it in unrated games.
Progress Tracking
Re-run this checklist every Monday and note your score distribution (
). After four weeks we will revisit the plan and adjust.Final Encouragement
You already beat several 2550-level opponents this week—proof that your ceiling is higher. Tighten the loose moves, manage your clock, and that next rating jump will follow naturally. Keep enjoying the game!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| James Canty | 54W / 169L / 18D | |
| advancedrook | 52W / 41L / 10D | |
| jmuralidharasastry | 64W / 10L / 1D | |
| Frank Johnson | 38W / 30L / 5D | |
| tobytrix21 | 54W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2671 | 2602 | 2428 | |
| 2024 | 2501 | 2502 | 2337 | |
| 2023 | 2611 | 2514 | 2342 | 1829 |
| 2022 | 2611 | 2426 | 2313 | 1832 |
| 2021 | 2603 | 2423 | 2247 | 1766 |
| 2020 | 2402 | 2501 | 2221 | 1579 |
| 2019 | 2250 | 2272 | 2102 | 1715 |
| 2018 | 2240 | 2177 | 1785 | 1712 |
| 2017 | 1602 | 1654 | 1699 | 1660 |
| 2016 | 1865 | 1837 | 1632 | |
| 2015 | 1660 | 1713 | 1668 | 959 |
| 2014 | 1243 | 1607 | 1648 | 1020 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 196W / 180L / 24D | 182W / 198L / 28D | 83.2 |
| 2024 | 226W / 221L / 33D | 214W / 251L / 19D | 83.2 |
| 2023 | 308W / 311L / 42D | 273W / 354L / 38D | 82.5 |
| 2022 | 727W / 283L / 93D | 677W / 322L / 88D | 72.5 |
| 2021 | 201W / 178L / 19D | 178W / 195L / 30D | 79.5 |
| 2020 | 555W / 450L / 51D | 491W / 489L / 65D | 75.7 |
| 2019 | 868W / 753L / 98D | 821W / 794L / 106D | 76.1 |
| 2018 | 1022W / 774L / 99D | 906W / 902L / 89D | 70.6 |
| 2017 | 570W / 448L / 53D | 505W / 513L / 57D | 70.1 |
| 2016 | 64W / 51L / 9D | 80W / 49L / 7D | 82.2 |
| 2015 | 243W / 192L / 33D | 230W / 224L / 30D | 76.5 |
| 2014 | 18W / 13L / 1D | 18W / 14L / 0D | 74.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 563 | 282 | 259 | 22 | 50.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 531 | 297 | 206 | 28 | 55.9% |
| Dutch Defense | 512 | 248 | 235 | 29 | 48.4% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 394 | 197 | 174 | 23 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 374 | 197 | 147 | 30 | 52.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 353 | 166 | 169 | 18 | 47.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 347 | 223 | 107 | 17 | 64.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 337 | 157 | 164 | 16 | 46.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 331 | 152 | 166 | 13 | 45.9% |
| Modern Defense | 266 | 144 | 109 | 13 | 54.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 433 | 219 | 193 | 21 | 50.6% |
| Dutch Defense | 328 | 153 | 159 | 16 | 46.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 281 | 127 | 141 | 13 | 45.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 268 | 142 | 118 | 8 | 53.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 225 | 121 | 97 | 7 | 53.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 220 | 97 | 114 | 9 | 44.1% |
| Modern Defense | 208 | 91 | 103 | 14 | 43.8% |
| Slav Defense | 183 | 92 | 84 | 7 | 50.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 180 | 82 | 89 | 9 | 45.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 177 | 73 | 93 | 11 | 41.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 78 | 58 | 18 | 2 | 74.4% |
| Australian Defense | 56 | 41 | 14 | 1 | 73.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 35 | 20 | 13 | 2 | 57.1% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 35 | 23 | 7 | 5 | 65.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 32 | 23 | 7 | 2 | 71.9% |
| Dutch Defense | 24 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 54.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 20 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 65.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 20 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 70.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 18 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 18 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 22.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 72 | 31 | 35 | 6 | 43.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 70 | 39 | 24 | 7 | 55.7% |
| Dutch Defense | 66 | 34 | 25 | 7 | 51.5% |
| Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation | 41 | 18 | 17 | 6 | 43.9% |
| Australian Defense | 39 | 25 | 10 | 4 | 64.1% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23 | 13 | 0 | 63.9% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 34 | 22 | 12 | 0 | 64.7% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 34 | 27 | 4 | 3 | 79.4% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 32 | 18 | 14 | 0 | 56.2% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 32 | 15 | 13 | 4 | 46.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 1 |
| Losing | 55 | 0 |