ChicagoDave1968: The Chess Hustler from the Windy City
Meet ChicagoDave1968, a titan of the chessboard whose moves have been baffling opponents since at least 2014. Starting his journey with a modest daily rating around 1400, Dave quickly ramped up the intensity, blazing across blitz and bullet games like a true chess storm. By 2025, he’s cruising with a blitz max rating north of 2500 and bullet near an astonishing 2555, proving he's no mere weekend warrior.
His style? Let’s just say Dave knows how to dig deep. With an endgame frequency over 81%, he clearly loves a good finale, squeezing every last drop of advantage out of the board. And if the odds are against him, fear not — his comeback rate is a whopping 90.58%, meaning when the chips are down, ChicagoDave hits back with the resilience of a true chess ninja. Plus, he’s got a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece. Talk about turning lemons into lemonade!
This isn't just some casual player either. His top-secret openings shroud an arsenal of over 14,000 blitz games and 22,000 bullet moves with a solid 53%+ win rate, enough to make grandmasters sweat. ChicagoDave’s longest winning streak? A cool 52 games. Currently, he’s on a hot streak of 7 wins, likely plotting the next surprise attack.
Opponents beware! Whether it’s the early hours or late at night, Dave’s winning rates stay steady, with a sneaky peak win rate of 75% at 11 AM – apparently, that’s prime time for checkmate. And while his tilt factor of 11 suggests he’s human like the rest of us (a lucky break for his foes), his psychological game remains solid.
Off the board, ChicagoDave1968 hails from Chicago and brings that city's no-nonsense grit to chess. His blitz and bullet count tally into the tens of thousands of games, a testament to hours logging online battles and refining his tactical wizardry. Notable is his fondness for clashes with a handful of regular rivals, keeping local chess drama alive in the digital realm.
When asked about his secret to success, he might just say: "Why make one brilliant move when you can have fifty brilliant games?" Whether a strategic mastermind or a lucky tactician, ChicagoDave1968 is a name that resonates – a player who turns the chessboard into his personal playground, one blitz at a time.
Performance snapshot
Your results show more wins than losses across your recent games, with a steady upward trend over different time frames. Openings you’ve been using — particularly Alapin variations of the Sicilian, Closed Sicilian lines, and Bird Opening branches — are yielding favorable middlegame positions and good chances to convert. Your strength-adjusted win rate sits above 0.58, and the rating trend slopes indicate a positive, steady progression.
What you’re doing well
- Choosing openings that lead to active, workable middlegames. You seem comfortable deriving plans from the pawn structure you create.
- Strong results in several Sicilian lines (Alapin variants and Closed lines) and in flexible systems like the Modern and Bird Opening branches. This shows versatility and readiness to adapt to different opponents.
- Consistent progress over 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month windows, suggesting a durable improvement trajectory rather than sporadic gains.
- Ability to convert advantages in tactical and dynamic positions, often reaching favorable endgames from solid middlegame play.
Openings that stand out
- Alapin Sicilian and its Sherzer Variation: multiple wins with no losses, indicating this setup fits your style and yields clear plans. Continue deepening knowledge of typical pawn structures and break ideas in these lines.
- Sicilian Defense: Closed: strong results across several games; maintain awareness of standard closed-sicilian plans, including timely c- and f-pawn breaks and piece coordination for a kingside attack or central play.
- Czech Defense and Bird Opening: Dutch Variation and Batavo Gambit: high win rates suggest these lines suit you well. Build a mental checklist of typical transitions and tactical motifs you encounter in these openings.
- Modern Defense: solid results; good for learning flexible piece development and counter-attacking ideas. Keep exploring how to strike in the center while coordinating pieces efficiently.
Areas to improve
- Don’t rely on a small group of openings. Several top-performing lines have small sample sizes, so broaden your repertoire to prevent overfitting. Add 1–2 additional lines with clear plans and common middlegame themes.
- Develop a stronger endgame awareness. For openings that lead to imbalanced pawn structures or simplified endings, practice common endgames to convert advantages more reliably.
- Review losses to identify recurring patterns (strategic concessions, tactical oversights, or timing issues). Targeted practice on those themes will help reduce similar mistakes in future games.
- Time management in longer games. Build a simple, repeatable thinking routine for the critical middlegame transitions so you don’t rush or overthink strategic decisions late in the game.
Practice plan and next steps
- Commit to 2–3 core openings (for example, Alapin Sicilian, Closed Sicilian, and Bird Opening variants) and study a small set of model games in each. Focus on typical middlegame plans, key pawn breaks, and standard endgames.
- After practicing, play a batch of focused games in those openings and jot down a brief recap after each game: what worked, what didn’t, and what you’ll adjust next time.
- Review a representative win and a representative loss in these lines with a coach or training partner to extract concrete improvements you can apply in your next games.
Optional enrichment
If you’d like, we can attach a compact Pgn example from a favored line to illustrate the ideas discussed. Example placeholder:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jorge Perez Rojas | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| meshter | 5W / 15L / 3D | |
| yellowmamba303 | 5W / 5L / 1D | |
| yoam978 | 30W / 21L / 11D | |
| aifanon | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| flappybird360 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| boca-mi-buen-amigo1312 | 3W / 0L / 1D | |
| olegunarsolskjaer | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| pawngrabber100 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| steponaz | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Joe Boyyy | 148W / 2L / 1D | |
| thechesschannel | 44W / 32L / 3D | |
| mo518491355846 | 35W / 34L / 6D | |
| Eagle_in_Blood | 38W / 26L / 4D | |
| Jean Lindner | 37W / 26L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2450 | 2501 | 2236 | |
| 2024 | 2382 | 2504 | 2239 | |
| 2023 | 2380 | 2426 | 2312 | 1985 |
| 2022 | 2251 | 2446 | 2274 | |
| 2021 | 2411 | 2404 | 1246 | |
| 2020 | 2500 | 2373 | 1518 | |
| 2019 | 2307 | 2473 | 1857 | 1983 |
| 2018 | 2413 | 2200 | ||
| 2017 | 2354 | 2304 | 1823 | |
| 2016 | 2374 | 2280 | 1524 | |
| 2015 | 2238 | 2176 | 1523 | |
| 2014 | 2213 | 2174 | 1175 | 1417 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1020W / 780L / 128D | 881W / 889L / 156D | 85.1 |
| 2024 | 1505W / 1096L / 231D | 1290W / 1319L / 216D | 82.8 |
| 2023 | 846W / 539L / 99D | 779W / 578L / 119D | 83.1 |
| 2022 | 1333W / 986L / 215D | 1220W / 1047L / 236D | 84.1 |
| 2021 | 1221W / 830L / 160D | 1082W / 946L / 167D | 83.3 |
| 2020 | 1693W / 1191L / 227D | 1565W / 1299L / 234D | 83.2 |
| 2019 | 716W / 386L / 93D | 631W / 449L / 109D | 83.5 |
| 2018 | 215W / 48L / 15D | 217W / 51L / 12D | 71.5 |
| 2017 | 108W / 50L / 16D | 112W / 59L / 11D | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 416W / 222L / 49D | 372W / 260L / 47D | 86.3 |
| 2015 | 475W / 215L / 46D | 402W / 257L / 55D | 83.9 |
| 2014 | 1211W / 583L / 130D | 1108W / 641L / 131D | 82.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 781 | 430 | 296 | 55 | 55.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 731 | 364 | 302 | 65 | 49.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 638 | 311 | 274 | 53 | 48.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 632 | 313 | 243 | 76 | 49.5% |
| Benko Gambit | 586 | 300 | 229 | 57 | 51.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 460 | 231 | 198 | 31 | 50.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 432 | 216 | 184 | 32 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 403 | 216 | 159 | 28 | 53.6% |
| Czech Defense | 391 | 235 | 128 | 28 | 60.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 388 | 226 | 132 | 30 | 58.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 41 | 39 | 2 | 0 | 95.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 23 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 73.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 21 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 66.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 64.3% |
| Benko Gambit | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 41.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Czech Defense | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 1381 | 774 | 525 | 82 | 56.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1337 | 756 | 482 | 99 | 56.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1150 | 637 | 425 | 88 | 55.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 897 | 460 | 383 | 54 | 51.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 829 | 395 | 372 | 62 | 47.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 815 | 456 | 301 | 58 | 56.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 704 | 338 | 308 | 58 | 48.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 669 | 351 | 259 | 59 | 52.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 625 | 346 | 226 | 53 | 55.4% |
| Modern | 592 | 334 | 226 | 32 | 56.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 52 | 4 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |