About Mustafa Yilmaz
Mustafa Yilmaz is a formidable Grandmaster known for his rapid and blitz chess prowess. He earned the esteemed Grandmaster title from FIDE, cementing his status among the chess elite. Known for his tactical sharpness and resilience, Mustafa shines especially in blitz games, where his quick thinking often leaves opponents in awe.
Playing Style & Strengths
If chess were a sprint, Mustafa would be a gold medalist! His preferred time control is Blitz, and with a peak blitz rating surpassing 3000, he is truly in a league of his own.
- Extremely low early resignation rate (0.78%), proving he fights till the end.
- Strong endgame skills, with an endgame frequency of 82.71% of his games.
- Remarkable comeback rate of 85.38%, showing his fighting spirit even after setbacks.
- Excellent win rate after losing a piece: 58.08% — proving that giving a piece might just be a clever trap!
- Average moves per win: ~78 moves, indicating well-fought, strategic battles.
Opening Repertoire Highlights
Mustafa employs a diverse and successful range of openings, tailoring his approach to keep opponents guessing.
- Blitz favorites: Caro-Kann Defense (Win rate: 75.9%), Reti: King’s Indian Attack, and Queen’s Pawn Game.
- Bullet specialists: Zukertort Opening: Pirc Invitation (70.6% win rate), Hungarian Opening (78.6%).
- Rapid repertoire includes: Queen’s Gambit Declined (Three Knights Variation), Indian Defence, and Semi-Tarrasch Defense.
Notable Achievements & Records
- Peak Blitz rating: 3088 in May 2025 — not just breaking the 3000 barrier, but sprinting past it!
- Longest winning streak of 42 games showcases his dominating form during peak periods.
- Over 4700 wins in Blitz with a win rate around 62%.
- Known to have an impeccable record against several opponents, with perfect win rates against some.
Fun Facts
- Mustafa’s best time of day to play is 19:00 — prime time for dazzling tactics and blitzing wins.
- His tactical prowess shines especially when trailing, boasting an impressive comeback rate.
- Despite loving rapid and blitz, his average moves per win suggest he enjoys a good, long fight rather than quick flashy wins.
Conclusion
Whether it’s lightning-fast bullet, merciless blitz, or the strategic dance of rapid chess, Mustafa Yilmaz displays extraordinary skill, persistence, and charm. A grandmaster with a heart of a fighter and the speed of a cheetah, he’s a player every chess fan wants to watch.
Overall Performance Insights
Mustafa, your current strength adjusted win rate is just above 50%, showing solid results in your recent blitz games. Your rating has increased by 20 points over the past month, reflecting positive short-term performance. However, the 3-month trend shows a slight decline with a decrease of 27 points and a negative slope. The 6-month trend indicates a significant improvement with a 238-point increase, but also a negative pace recently.
Maintaining consistency while managing fluctuations in form will be key to continuing your growth in blitz chess.
Positives From Recent Wins
- You demonstrate strong opening preparation and an ability to capitalize on strategic positions, particularly in Indian Game and Queens Indian Defense.
- Excellent tactical awareness allowed you to convert advantages smoothly, including well-timed attacks and pawn promotions.
- You show good endgame technique, efficiently exploiting material edge and piece activity.
- Utilization of dynamic piece play and central control contributed to your opponents' resignation in multiple games.
Areas for Improvement
- Defensive Coordination: Some losses resulted from pressure in the middle game leading to weakened king safety. Focus on enhancing your king's safety especially against aggressive piece invasions.
- Time Management: In blitz games, there were moments where clock pressure impacted your decision-making. Practice quicker assessment of critical positions to avoid falling behind on time.
- Opening Consistency: While your opening choices are solid, there are opportunities to deepen your preparation, especially in lines where opponents managed to generate significant counterplay (e.g., Caro-Kann Exchange Variation).
- Handling Opponent Counterplay: A few games show susceptibility to opponent tactical shots or initiative. Increasing your tactical alertness and calculation speed can minimize these risks.
Recommended Focus Areas
- Study defensive techniques within openings you regularly play to shore up vulnerabilities.
- Review key positions from recent losses to understand turning points and improve decision-making under time pressure.
- Practice tactical puzzles emphasizing both calculation speed and pattern recognition to enhance your resilience against opponent threats.
- Maintain a balanced training routine that addresses openings, tactics, and endgame fundamentals to support all phases of your game.
Closing Thoughts
Your steady improvement over six months is promising. The recent positive rating slope for the last month suggests your efforts are paying off. Keep analyzing your losses constructively, focus on rapid evaluation skills, and continue building upon your strengths. Consistency and adaptability in blitz play will further raise your level.
Good luck in your upcoming games, Mustafa!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Rustemov | 40W / 21L / 7D | |
| Antoni Kozak | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| Christopher Woojin Yoo | 4W / 5L / 1D | |
| Vasif Durarbayli | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Mark Bluvshtein | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Seo Jungmin | 3W / 5L / 2D | |
| the-misterious-player | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Zhamsaran Tsydypov | 3W / 9L / 1D | |
| zzdxer | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| koroshalizadegan | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vahap Sanal | 41W / 39L / 10D | |
| Cemil Aghamaliyev | 45W / 33L / 6D | |
| Alexander Rustemov | 40W / 21L / 7D | |
| Murad İbrahimli | 33W / 18L / 10D | |
| Dmitrij Kollars | 29W / 27L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2924 | 2970 | 2597 | |
| 2024 | 2932 | 2884 | 2605 | |
| 2023 | 2926 | 2891 | 2569 | |
| 2022 | 2868 | 2926 | 2477 | |
| 2021 | 2862 | 2976 | 2604 | |
| 2020 | 2923 | 2973 | 2604 | |
| 2019 | 2862 | 2879 | ||
| 2018 | 2723 | 2853 | ||
| 2017 | 2704 | 2715 | ||
| 2016 | 2603 | 2588 | ||
| 2015 | 2385 | 2626 | ||
| 2014 | 2347 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 228W / 108L / 34D | 189W / 153L / 26D | 91.9 |
| 2024 | 237W / 163L / 34D | 229W / 174L / 31D | 89.3 |
| 2023 | 189W / 112L / 24D | 188W / 114L / 24D | 86.4 |
| 2022 | 350W / 118L / 21D | 345W / 125L / 32D | 75.2 |
| 2021 | 639W / 224L / 52D | 622W / 234L / 64D | 79.6 |
| 2020 | 307W / 172L / 64D | 291W / 187L / 56D | 88.0 |
| 2019 | 86W / 55L / 12D | 84W / 62L / 11D | 88.8 |
| 2018 | 231W / 123L / 34D | 220W / 140L / 27D | 88.7 |
| 2017 | 163W / 95L / 25D | 155W / 105L / 19D | 87.5 |
| 2016 | 105W / 62L / 11D | 104W / 61L / 16D | 86.6 |
| 2015 | 59W / 17L / 4D | 42W / 30L / 6D | 87.4 |
| 2014 | 43W / 5L / 2D | 37W / 10L / 3D | 81.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 309 | 184 | 94 | 31 | 59.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 168 | 101 | 56 | 11 | 60.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 143 | 85 | 46 | 12 | 59.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 127 | 76 | 42 | 9 | 59.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 122 | 76 | 35 | 11 | 62.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 118 | 79 | 31 | 8 | 67.0% |
| Modern | 111 | 74 | 31 | 6 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 108 | 65 | 36 | 7 | 60.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 107 | 64 | 37 | 6 | 59.8% |
| Döry Defense | 102 | 59 | 32 | 11 | 57.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 42 | 28 | 12 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 28 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 69.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 20 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 30.0% |
| Döry Defense | 19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 52.6% |
| Modern | 17 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Australian Defense | 14 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 21.4% |
| Bird Opening | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Czech Defense | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: Ragozin | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 27.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 42 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 1 |